Second time you post stuff like this when you notice your arguments are too thin. Put me on ignore and you don’t need to read my posts. And don’t address posts to me if you already think I wrote too much. The most interesting in those stats is how you and 3 other haters can have so many posts in that thread.
It's actually the opposite. You post conceded goals stat like it's a justification of how well Lindelof plays. You completely ignore our tactics of two defensively minded centre mids, completely ignoring the lock down capability of AWB/Shaw and generally our tumescent ability to break down teams meaning we don't stretch the game enough to leave our defence to be exposed. You've literally even admitted in this thread that Lindelof is someone, who marks space more than the attacker. In a team, where we usually dominate possession and don't leave many 1 vs 1 duels for most of our defence, what use is marking space? The few and far opportunities our opponents have, Lindelof is so concerned with not making a mistake, he drags our whole team back back pedalling to 'zonally' mark (which is bizarrely praised as intelligent like he's dealing with Messi on the wings in every encouter). That's why he's consistently called passive and weak, yet you will debate to death about the interpretations of the words and choose to give Lindelof benefit of the doubt in every single situation.
You try to take the moral high ground about 'Lindelof haters' when there's plenty of individual posters in this thread and the whole forum making comments that he's simply not good enough. You'll take the Caf rating and imply he's been rated by the Caf but ignore the hundreds of counter posts with detailed reasoning and analysis as 'haters'. A single digit rating is inferior to actual words no matter how much you want to spin it. I'm a hater as much as you are a fanboy.
You try to elevate and conflate Lindelof and Maguire 'cooperating' together to suggest the former is therefore of a good enough quality. I gave you the McFred example, I've given you the fact of our high goals scored tally and how being 2nd don't mean shit. Will you post 400+ times in Fred, McT and each of the attackers threads to say 'we've scored the xyz most goals and we've got 2nd place because of our midfield, therefore each of them are of a good enough standard'? Of course you won't because it's ludicrous to suggest that, the same as it is ludicrous to suggest Lindelof is some high performing player. In fact, you'll regularly defend Lindelof and his 'contribution' to our defensive record as if he is one of the major factors and lamblast our attack for not scoring enough. Lindelof would be proud of this deferring and deflection tactics.