Where does Ancelotti rank among all time great managers?

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,255
Managers count though. Otherwise Benitez, Lopetegui and Solari would have had much better results.
I was doing the same thing people did with Zidane, Ancelotti is clearly a great manager.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,406
Supports
Chelsea
His league record will always be a bit of an elephant in the room despite his UCL exploits. 5 in 19 years (at clubs where there was a chance to win, 21 if you felt Napoli stood a chance) isn't great (when compared to the likes of Mou, Pep, Fergie etc), even if those 5 allowed him to do the grand slam. Pep at those clubs would have probably had around 13 and it would have been played down because "anyone can do it at Milan/Chelsea/Bayern/Real/PSG".

That's not to say he isn't a great manager all in all because he quite clearly is but I think the league record puts him slightly behind the likes of Pep and prime Mou who themselves are behind Fergie. In a domestic setting I'd rate Conte higher but obviously Carlo pisses all over him on the continent.
 
Last edited:

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
So long as you keep winning the CL who cares about the league.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,082
The only reason he got sacked by Madrid the first time was that Barcelona won the treble.
 

Xaviesta

Full Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2014
Messages
11,791
Location
Camp Nou
Supports
Barcelona
His European record is simply the best. His league record when you look at the clubs he's managed and players he's worked with leaves a fair bit to be desired. He's yet to win consecutive league titles in his career although there's a fair chance he would have won back to back leagues at Bayern.


His league record will always be a bit of an elephant in the room a bit despite his UCL exploits. 5 in 19 years (at clubs where there was a chance to win, 21 if you felt Napoli stood a chance) isn't great (when compared to the likes of Mou, Pep, Fergie etc), even if those 5 allowed him to do the grand slam. Pep at those clubs would have probably had around 13 and it would have been played down because "anyone can do it at Milan/Chelsea/Bayern/Real/PSG".

That's not to say he isn't a great manager all in all because he quite clearly is but I think the league record puts him slightly behind the likes of Pep and prime Mou who themselves are behind Fergie. In a domestic setting I'd rate Conte higher but obviously Carlo pisses all over him on the continent.
Excellent post.
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,568
He is among the very best. His CL record more than makes up for his league record (5 league titles in 5 different countries is still impressive).
 

GuybrushThreepwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Messages
1,163
Supports
Blackburn Rovers
The only reason he got sacked by Madrid the first time was that Barcelona won the treble.
I think Real won 22 consecutive matches in all competitions in the middle of that season. It's safe to say that the many of the players were not exactly thrilled that he was replaced with Benitez that summer ! From Barca's perspective, they beat insanely strong competition domestically and in Europe to win that treble.

It terms of his legacy, the biggest 'hole' on his CV (if one even exists) is winning just 1 Serie A title in about 10 years with Juve / Milan. but I think his CL record is more than enough to make up for that. I'd probably still rank Mourinho just above him (obviously with Fergie well clear in 1st place), but it is close.
 
Last edited:

GuybrushThreepwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Messages
1,163
Supports
Blackburn Rovers
Yeah, you might be right. But Carlo has to get credit for still being able to deliver for them. And then they literally seemed to have discovered the trick of winning it
I think that the various CL matches against Bayern highlighted a notable difference between Real under Mourinho and Real under Ancelotti (and also under Zidane). That's not to say that Mourinho was a failure or anything though, and the club definitely improved a lot under him.

Real were easily the best team in the Europe in 2011/2012, and after Ozil's equaliser in Munich, they sat back and were clearly happy to settle for a draw. While to be fair a draw would have been decent result, that approach proved to be costly with Bayern scoring a late winner in that 1st leg and ultimately going through. Under Ancelotti (or Zidane) after equalising in Munich, Real would have instead felt that Bayern were on the ropes and pressed for a winner.
 
Last edited:

Henrik Larsson

Still logged in at RAWK (help!)
Joined
Sep 13, 2013
Messages
5,421
Location
Swashbucklington
His league record will always be a bit of an elephant in the room despite his UCL exploits. 5 in 19 years (at clubs where there was a chance to win, 21 if you felt Napoli stood a chance) isn't great (when compared to the likes of Mou, Pep, Fergie etc), even if those 5 allowed him to do the grand slam. Pep at those clubs would have probably had around 13 and it would have been played down because "anyone can do it at Milan/Chelsea/Bayern/Real/PSG".

That's not to say he isn't a great manager all in all because he quite clearly is but I think the league record puts him slightly behind the likes of Pep and prime Mou who themselves are behind Fergie. In a domestic setting I'd rate Conte higher but obviously Carlo pisses all over him on the continent.
While there's probably a tiny bit of truth to it, I think the whole league record is such a lame argument. The Serie A was literally rigged and fixed during a lot of his time there, it's simply not really possible to give a fair verdict. And he still got plenty of good or decent league campaigns with 2nd places and stuff, it's not like he's very often completely mismanaged teams leading to atrocious league campaings, or had a lot of those full blown meltdowns leaving everything in shambles like Mr. Mourinho has had a couple of times.

The only reason he got sacked by Madrid the first time was that Barcelona won the treble.
Don't Real also have the unwritten rule that a manager is simply always sacked after a season with no major trophies? Which was the case that year. I think it's been like that even before the Beenhakker days, though there might be an exception or two throughout the years.
 

ilrm

New Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2022
Messages
647
Supports
Real Madrid
I think the Real Madrid was down to the improvements under Mourinho. They went from a clown club to challenging in semi finals under him
100% correct. Mourinho added a street thug spirit in our team that was lost since 2003, when we decided to go all-out on the Galactico route. Los Galacticos could never have produced a defensive performance like yesterday.
 

ilrm

New Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2022
Messages
647
Supports
Real Madrid
Tier 1: Herrera, Michels, SAF, Cruyff, Pep, etc
Tier 2: ANCELOTTI, Del Bosque, Trappatoni, Mourinho, etc.
Tier 3: Zidane, Klopp, Wenger, etc.
 

haru krentz

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 25, 2022
Messages
280
He's been managing club since mid 90's clearly competitor for SAF in regard of longevity, and just like SAF he's never stuck into one system.

It's Madrid, not the managers.
You think Ralf will succeed with this Madrid's team??

Tier 1: Herrera, Michels, SAF, Cruyff, Pep, etc
Tier 2: ANCELOTTI, Del Bosque, Trappatoni, Mourinho, etc.
Tier 3: Zidane, Klopp, Wenger, etc.
Unfair to put Klopp into tier 3 alongside Wenger and Zidane. Have you seen where were Liverpool when he took over??
 

Red the Bear

Something less generic
Joined
Aug 26, 2021
Messages
9,127
I would be interested to read his book on manager tips if he ever writes one, seems to so seamlessly control the locker room and put his players at ease making them play at their best.
Has a lot of character.
 

phelans shorts

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
27,217
Location
Gaz. Is a Mewling Quim.
While there's probably a tiny bit of truth to it, I think the whole league record is such a lame argument. The Serie A was literally rigged and fixed during a lot of his time there, it's simply not really possible to give a fair verdict. And he still got plenty of good or decent league campaigns with 2nd places and stuff, it's not like he's very often completely mismanaged teams leading to atrocious league campaings, or had a lot of those full blown meltdowns leaving everything in shambles like Mr. Mourinho has had a couple of times.
while you’re not wrong on Serie A, the level of corruption there also works against him. He spent two full seasons with the single most corrupt, match fixing institution and didn’t win the league. That is absolutely awful whichever way you look at it.

Carlo is obviously brilliant, but saying he’s held back by his domestic record is absolutely fair. Not winning the league with the turn of the millennium Juventus with Moggi’s “influence” is undeniably a major failure.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
Tier 1: Herrera, Michels, SAF, Cruyff, Pep, etc
Tier 2: ANCELOTTI, Del Bosque, Trappatoni, Mourinho, etc.
Tier 3: Zidane, Klopp, Wenger, etc.
Where would you put Arrigo Sacchi? He certainly was better than Jose.
 

RedBanker

I love you Ole
Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
2,660
I wouldn't want him at Man United so I can't say I rate him that much. Would take many managers over him

Real Madrid as a squad are just a winning machine I don't think its down to him
You are new to football i think
 

didz

Full Member
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
1,550
Isn't this his first League&CL double?

I've always felt like if you win the CL without winning your league, it takes a little bit of the shine off it. So for me, this season probably proves him to be a better manager than I thought - and I did rate him highly before.
 

ilrm

New Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2022
Messages
647
Supports
Real Madrid
Where would you put Arrigo Sacchi? He certainly was better than Jose.
Respectfully disagree … I’d have him a tier below Mourinho … Mourinho has done it across multiple leagues versus Sacchi who had a brief peak managing the Chelsea of his time. Sacchi’s famed pressing style also deteriorated in his final years and he was unable to replicate style or success with either Italy or Atletico.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
And Clough and Sir Matt.
Clough won it twice as did Sacchi. But that team at Milan was unbelievable. I saw them take apart Real Madrid. It was brutal. Carlo scored a beautiful goal too.
 

Pretzels81

Not Salty…
Newbie
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
1,766
Top10 of all time.
Busby, Herrera, Michels, Paisley, Sacchi, Cruyff, Ferguson, Ancelotti, Del Bosque, Pep (I'd place Mou in the Top11-15, with Clough, Zidane,etc).

UCL titles record, winner of all Big 5 Leagues; also, this UCL 2022 is an special achievement: beating the PL's Top3 (including the defending UCL champions-Chelsea- and a state-backed oil club-City) and another oil club (PSG).

Carlo will never get enough credit for this season: a Liga/UCL double, winning the UCL during the era of City/Bayern/PSG.

I don't know what will happen to Madrid next (they haven't signed Haaland, nor Mbappé, and Carlo isn't known for long spells at any club-after his stint at AC), but 2021-22 is easily one of Madrid's Top5 seasons ever.
 
Last edited:

Henrik Larsson

Still logged in at RAWK (help!)
Joined
Sep 13, 2013
Messages
5,421
Location
Swashbucklington
while you’re not wrong on Serie A, the level of corruption there also works against him. He spent two full seasons with the single most corrupt, match fixing institution and didn’t win the league. That is absolutely awful whichever way you look at it.

Carlo is obviously brilliant, but saying he’s held back by his domestic record is absolutely fair. Not winning the league with the turn of the millennium Juventus with Moggi’s “influence” is undeniably a major failure.
That's obviously exactly my point :lol:

While I understand your 'logic', surely you realise how flawed the argument you're making here truly is? It's literally impossible to judge for us outsiders what exactly went on, there was lots of corruption by various clubs. But because Juventus were deemed to be the most corrupt years later which is questionable on itself - and again is impossible for us outsiders to correctly judge because of all the cheating and corruption - Ancelotti has failed awfully.
Because he finished 2nd, one point behind Lazio who were also heavily implicated and initially relegated to Serie B for their involvement years later? That makes no logical sense at all. That Seria A period is just a clusterfeck where you can't really give a fair opinion I think.

I would say the fact that he spent 10 years at two Italian elite clubs and only won 1 league title, during a time where the Seria A was corrupt is bizarre.

But then outside of Italy he doesn't struggle half as much winning league titles in leagues that weren't as corrupt or fixed. If that's not telling you anything, then I don't know what does.

And obviously the whole debate about his league records stems from the fact that he was at Juve and AC Milan for 10 years and only won one Scudetto, because if we ignore that period nobody would call him a particularly bad league manager :wenger:
 

Pintu

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
4,165
Location
Sweden
His league record will always be a bit of an elephant in the room despite his UCL exploits. 5 in 19 years (at clubs where there was a chance to win, 21 if you felt Napoli stood a chance) isn't great (when compared to the likes of Mou, Pep, Fergie etc), even if those 5 allowed him to do the grand slam. Pep at those clubs would have probably had around 13 and it would have been played down because "anyone can do it at Milan/Chelsea/Bayern/Real/PSG".
Milan won 1 single Serie A between 97-02 prior to Ancelotti's first full season for them (They won it in 99 thanks to Lazio tiring themselves with the CWC). Milan never existed in the CL in the 7 years preceding Ancelotti... Suggesting it was as easy to win Serie A for Milan back then as it is to win for City or Bayern in 2010-2020 is insane. When Ancelotti takes over at Milan, there are 4 Italian clubs in Uefa's top 10 ranking and Milan is not one of them. And the then champions (Roma) are not among them either... After Calciopoli, he never had a shot at winning the League, Roma was the only team in a position to disturb Inter's domination then... Only winning the treble ended the hunger at Inter and the competition came back as they went down.
 

ilrm

New Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2022
Messages
647
Supports
Real Madrid
Unfair to put Klopp into tier 3 alongside Wenger and Zidane. Have you seen where were Liverpool when he took over??
There is always going to be some debate on adjacent tiers: Tier 1 vs 2 or Tier 2 vs 3.
I’m just looking at their overall impact on the game, club and trophies. Very hard to be perfectly objective.
 

Blood Mage

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
5,933
Definitely in the top 5. I'd put Fergie, Mourinho and Pep above him but that's it.
 

Iker Quesadillas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Messages
3,996
Supports
Real Madrid
His European record is simply the best. His league record when you look at the clubs he's managed and players he's worked with leaves a fair bit to be desired. He's yet to win consecutive league titles in his career although there's a fair chance he would have won back to back leagues at Bayern.
I would note that as far as I can tell AC Milan have only won consecutive Serie A titles once in their entire history (3 consecutive titles in the late 80s). Real Madrid haven't won consecutive league titles a single time during Florentino Perez's presidency (and only once in the 21st century), and Chelsea have only won consecutive PL titles once in their history (the 2 Mourinho won in his first stint).
He's not necessarily underperforming relative to other managers, but you could argue that in the league he can't elevate the club.
 

paraguayo

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Messages
1,339
Supports
neutral
I still think he would have been the correct choice immediately after fergie. He's not one to rip up what works. He would have taken what fergie did, tweaked it and gradually rebuilt the squad while being competitive. Shame he never got the chance to manage us.
agree 100%
 

huyn

Full Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
754
Supports
FC Nantes
One of the very best. What stands out the most is his longevity, he's been a manager for 30 years, over 20 of those at the highest level, there arent many managers who stayed at the top for that long. We talk a lot about Pep, Klopp or Zidane but those guys are babies compared to Ancelotti. Also, all the other great managers have their share of haters, I dont think there are many people who hate Ancelotti, he seems to be liked and respected by pretty much everyone, fans, players and fellow coaches, and for good reasons, he's always been a class act.