Idxomer
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2014
- Messages
- 15,255
I was doing the same thing people did with Zidane, Ancelotti is clearly a great manager.Managers count though. Otherwise Benitez, Lopetegui and Solari would have had much better results.
I was doing the same thing people did with Zidane, Ancelotti is clearly a great manager.Managers count though. Otherwise Benitez, Lopetegui and Solari would have had much better results.
Excellent post.His league record will always be a bit of an elephant in the room a bit despite his UCL exploits. 5 in 19 years (at clubs where there was a chance to win, 21 if you felt Napoli stood a chance) isn't great (when compared to the likes of Mou, Pep, Fergie etc), even if those 5 allowed him to do the grand slam. Pep at those clubs would have probably had around 13 and it would have been played down because "anyone can do it at Milan/Chelsea/Bayern/Real/PSG".
That's not to say he isn't a great manager all in all because he quite clearly is but I think the league record puts him slightly behind the likes of Pep and prime Mou who themselves are behind Fergie. In a domestic setting I'd rate Conte higher but obviously Carlo pisses all over him on the continent.
I think Real won 22 consecutive matches in all competitions in the middle of that season. It's safe to say that the many of the players were not exactly thrilled that he was replaced with Benitez that summer ! From Barca's perspective, they beat insanely strong competition domestically and in Europe to win that treble.The only reason he got sacked by Madrid the first time was that Barcelona won the treble.
SAF's amount of PL wins isn't impressive to you?So long as you keep winning the CL who cares about the league.
It's impressive in a national perspective. CL is the best of best.SAF's amount of PL wins isn't impressive to you?
I think that the various CL matches against Bayern highlighted a notable difference between Real under Mourinho and Real under Ancelotti (and also under Zidane). That's not to say that Mourinho was a failure or anything though, and the club definitely improved a lot under him.Yeah, you might be right. But Carlo has to get credit for still being able to deliver for them. And then they literally seemed to have discovered the trick of winning it
While there's probably a tiny bit of truth to it, I think the whole league record is such a lame argument. The Serie A was literally rigged and fixed during a lot of his time there, it's simply not really possible to give a fair verdict. And he still got plenty of good or decent league campaigns with 2nd places and stuff, it's not like he's very often completely mismanaged teams leading to atrocious league campaings, or had a lot of those full blown meltdowns leaving everything in shambles like Mr. Mourinho has had a couple of times.His league record will always be a bit of an elephant in the room despite his UCL exploits. 5 in 19 years (at clubs where there was a chance to win, 21 if you felt Napoli stood a chance) isn't great (when compared to the likes of Mou, Pep, Fergie etc), even if those 5 allowed him to do the grand slam. Pep at those clubs would have probably had around 13 and it would have been played down because "anyone can do it at Milan/Chelsea/Bayern/Real/PSG".
That's not to say he isn't a great manager all in all because he quite clearly is but I think the league record puts him slightly behind the likes of Pep and prime Mou who themselves are behind Fergie. In a domestic setting I'd rate Conte higher but obviously Carlo pisses all over him on the continent.
Don't Real also have the unwritten rule that a manager is simply always sacked after a season with no major trophies? Which was the case that year. I think it's been like that even before the Beenhakker days, though there might be an exception or two throughout the years.The only reason he got sacked by Madrid the first time was that Barcelona won the treble.
100% correct. Mourinho added a street thug spirit in our team that was lost since 2003, when we decided to go all-out on the Galactico route. Los Galacticos could never have produced a defensive performance like yesterday.I think the Real Madrid was down to the improvements under Mourinho. They went from a clown club to challenging in semi finals under him
You think Ralf will succeed with this Madrid's team??It's Madrid, not the managers.
Unfair to put Klopp into tier 3 alongside Wenger and Zidane. Have you seen where were Liverpool when he took over??Tier 1: Herrera, Michels, SAF, Cruyff, Pep, etc
Tier 2: ANCELOTTI, Del Bosque, Trappatoni, Mourinho, etc.
Tier 3: Zidane, Klopp, Wenger, etc.
while you’re not wrong on Serie A, the level of corruption there also works against him. He spent two full seasons with the single most corrupt, match fixing institution and didn’t win the league. That is absolutely awful whichever way you look at it.While there's probably a tiny bit of truth to it, I think the whole league record is such a lame argument. The Serie A was literally rigged and fixed during a lot of his time there, it's simply not really possible to give a fair verdict. And he still got plenty of good or decent league campaigns with 2nd places and stuff, it's not like he's very often completely mismanaged teams leading to atrocious league campaings, or had a lot of those full blown meltdowns leaving everything in shambles like Mr. Mourinho has had a couple of times.
Where would you put Arrigo Sacchi? He certainly was better than Jose.Tier 1: Herrera, Michels, SAF, Cruyff, Pep, etc
Tier 2: ANCELOTTI, Del Bosque, Trappatoni, Mourinho, etc.
Tier 3: Zidane, Klopp, Wenger, etc.
You are new to football i thinkI wouldn't want him at Man United so I can't say I rate him that much. Would take many managers over him
Real Madrid as a squad are just a winning machine I don't think its down to him
100% this.He’d have won the a couple of cups and pushed for the title if he’d have taken over that side rather than Moyes.
And Clough and Sir Matt.Where would you put Arrigo Sacchi? He certainly was better than Jose.
Respectfully disagree … I’d have him a tier below Mourinho … Mourinho has done it across multiple leagues versus Sacchi who had a brief peak managing the Chelsea of his time. Sacchi’s famed pressing style also deteriorated in his final years and he was unable to replicate style or success with either Italy or Atletico.Where would you put Arrigo Sacchi? He certainly was better than Jose.
Clough won it twice as did Sacchi. But that team at Milan was unbelievable. I saw them take apart Real Madrid. It was brutal. Carlo scored a beautiful goal too.And Clough and Sir Matt.
That's obviously exactly my pointwhile you’re not wrong on Serie A, the level of corruption there also works against him. He spent two full seasons with the single most corrupt, match fixing institution and didn’t win the league. That is absolutely awful whichever way you look at it.
Carlo is obviously brilliant, but saying he’s held back by his domestic record is absolutely fair. Not winning the league with the turn of the millennium Juventus with Moggi’s “influence” is undeniably a major failure.
Milan won 1 single Serie A between 97-02 prior to Ancelotti's first full season for them (They won it in 99 thanks to Lazio tiring themselves with the CWC). Milan never existed in the CL in the 7 years preceding Ancelotti... Suggesting it was as easy to win Serie A for Milan back then as it is to win for City or Bayern in 2010-2020 is insane. When Ancelotti takes over at Milan, there are 4 Italian clubs in Uefa's top 10 ranking and Milan is not one of them. And the then champions (Roma) are not among them either... After Calciopoli, he never had a shot at winning the League, Roma was the only team in a position to disturb Inter's domination then... Only winning the treble ended the hunger at Inter and the competition came back as they went down.His league record will always be a bit of an elephant in the room despite his UCL exploits. 5 in 19 years (at clubs where there was a chance to win, 21 if you felt Napoli stood a chance) isn't great (when compared to the likes of Mou, Pep, Fergie etc), even if those 5 allowed him to do the grand slam. Pep at those clubs would have probably had around 13 and it would have been played down because "anyone can do it at Milan/Chelsea/Bayern/Real/PSG".
This is such a soft WUM attempt.Tier 1: Herrera, Michels, SAF, Cruyff, Pep, etc
Tier 2: ANCELOTTI, Del Bosque, Trappatoni, Mourinho, etc.
Tier 3: Zidane, Klopp, Wenger, etc.
There is always going to be some debate on adjacent tiers: Tier 1 vs 2 or Tier 2 vs 3.Unfair to put Klopp into tier 3 alongside Wenger and Zidane. Have you seen where were Liverpool when he took over??
What is the WUM? Is it Klopp? Why is he better than Wenger?This is such a soft WUM attempt.
It’s a cup competition that doesn’t even adhere to its name.It's impressive in a national perspective. CL is the best of best.
I would note that as far as I can tell AC Milan have only won consecutive Serie A titles once in their entire history (3 consecutive titles in the late 80s). Real Madrid haven't won consecutive league titles a single time during Florentino Perez's presidency (and only once in the 21st century), and Chelsea have only won consecutive PL titles once in their history (the 2 Mourinho won in his first stint).His European record is simply the best. His league record when you look at the clubs he's managed and players he's worked with leaves a fair bit to be desired. He's yet to win consecutive league titles in his career although there's a fair chance he would have won back to back leagues at Bayern.
agree 100%I still think he would have been the correct choice immediately after fergie. He's not one to rip up what works. He would have taken what fergie did, tweaked it and gradually rebuilt the squad while being competitive. Shame he never got the chance to manage us.
This made me sad, wish we had snatched him up after FergieTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date