AndySmith1990
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2021
- Messages
- 5,892
The worst run clubs are United and Everton
From a Newcastle fan's perspective:The Rest:
The rest I feel aren't noteworthy one way or another. They make mistakes but also do some good. It's too early to judge Newcastle right now.
Not sure about Burnley, aren't their owners basically Glazer equivalents... feel like them still being in the league is like 99% DycheBest
Leicester
Burnley
Brighton
Leeds
Worst
Man Utd
Everton
Arsenal
Tottenham
The best clubs perform above their resources, the worst perform well below their resources.
Fair on Burnley. You could argue they maybe struck gold with hiring Dyche but they have remained in the Premier League with very little resources in contrast to the teams around them, which in itself is commendable.Not sure about Burnley, aren't their owners basically Glazer equivalents... feel like them still being in the league is like 99% Dyche
Agree about the rest, Everton are about as well run as the Met.
Yes, but the owners are the worst people, so...Why are people adding Newcastle to being the worst run, they are under new owners
I mean City aren't exactly owned by saints either yet they're one of the best run clubs in the world......Yes, but the owners are the worst people, so...
Lots of people criticize Chelsea's trigger-happy and player-laundering management but it works amazingly well for them. They have been serial winners since Roman came in. Definitely well run overall.Since Mr. Roman Abramovich took over, Chelsea has won:
- 5 x Premier League
- 2 x Champion League
- 2 x Europa League
- 5 x FA Cup
- 3 x League Cup
- 2 x Super Cup
So for me Chelsea is an easy pick for best run club in recent time.
Worst run club? Well... United is a possible candidate
Are they? Or do the results just cover that up. They've been flying by the seat of their pants with FFP and relying on technicalities.I mean City aren't exactly owned by saints either yet they're one of the best run clubs in the world......