manichester
Full Member
Amad for me is first choice Mb, Cu, and Ses have not been that good.

Imagine Amorim throwing him back to RWB after that AFCON. Thank fecking God he's gone.After the AFCON he’s having, any manager would be stupid to drop him. He’s red hot
Cunha has started scoring a couple of goals to be fairAmad for me is first choice Mb, Cu, and Ses have not been that good.
Rashford absolutely not.It'll be Amad or Sesko this season, with this being our likely attack:
Mbeumo...Bruno...Cunha
Sesko
Or
Amad...Bruno...Cunha
Mbeumo
I expect Bruno will leave next season, and I'd like to see Cunha then play through the middle with our playmaking coming from deeper.
That'll free up the right wing, but Amad isn't particularly suited there.
Mbeumo...Cunha...Amad
Sesko
Maybe a place for Rashford when Barca inevitably back out of the permanent deal?![]()
If I was Fletcher/interim manager I would retain Heaven in the XI until he gives reason to be replaced.I know this is off topic, but still, seems most people line up Martinez and de Ligt, and I'm not too sure of that partnership, we need some recovery pace. And what do we do with Heaven? "Thank you, you're getting better and better but back to the bench". I think Heaven has earned the right to play. And I'd pair him with de Ligt.
If I was Fletcher/interim manager I would retain Heaven in the XI until he gives reason to be replaced.
He did but he wasn’t keen on Lukaku due to how average his general football technique was. Unfortunately Sesko is worse than Lukaku in terms of technical ability. I feel like Ole isn’t a fan of the big brute centre forward and that’s why he converted Martial into the Cf. I think he might do that again.Could be possible. Ole loved a fluid front 3 with Rashford, Martial and Greenwood. But I recon with him being a ST himself he may work on improving Sesko and getting goals from him.
I don’t think them being up front would necessarily mean ‘stick up front’. It would have to be interchangeable and fluid.The difficulty is that neither Mbeumo or Cunha are any good upfront.
If Amad can play off the left then we could play Mbeumo, Cunha and Amad behind Sesko with Bruno in midfield.
He did but he wasn’t keen on Lukaku due to how average his general football technique was. Unfortunately Sesko is worse than Lukaku in terms of technical ability. I feel like Ole isn’t a fan of the big brute centre forward and that’s why he converted Martial into the Cf. I think he might do that again.
I don’t think them being up front would necessarily mean ‘stick up front’. It would have to be interchangeable and fluid.
As Dembele was at PSG, Havertz at Arsenal or Foden at city before Haaland. None were actually centre forwards but the system worked cos they were intelligent footballers.
You aren't dropping amad. You are finding balance and playing 3 of Cunha, amad, Mbeumo, Mount and sesko. So probably the first 3 will be the mains.
Honestly the biggest impact to this is Mount. The biggest impact to any formation is whoever is competing with Bruno Fernandes for minutes. If Ole sees Bruno as a 10, then it's whoever else competes for the 10 spot will see a big reduction in game time.
What a great problem to have.4-3-3, 4-2-3-1, 4-1-3-2 and so forth leaves us with one expensive or star turn benched. We’ve spent £200m on our new attackers, plus there’s Amad, Bruno and Mount already here, I think at most that’s 5 positions taken across the attack, but realistically 4 with a surplus of two on the bench.
We don’t play enough games in the remainder of the season for it to be a question of rotation as the permanent fixtures in the XI will always start, outside of fitness issues, so who do believe those players are, and who do you think gets dropped with a bunch of excuses as to why?
Is Mbeumo/Amad the elephant in the room, or can they actually play together and be optimised?
I’m thinking Cunha and Sesko get the chop.
In theory, Amad. Mbeumo is probably a better player than him, and both would ideally play in the same spot. And while you could bench Sesko instead, that would presumably involve playing Cunha at CF, where he is a much worse player. And benching Amad is easier than benching a recent, big money signing. And there are obvious tactical benefits to having Sesko's physical profile at CF.
In practice, there will probably be rotation, injuries, variances in form and a reluctance to play someone like Zirkzee (meaning Sesko/Cunha cover each other at CF), so there probably won't be a definitive answer. Players will shuffle in and out until the season ends.
I know this is off topic, but still, seems most people line up Martinez and de Ligt, and I'm not too sure of that partnership, we need some recovery pace. And what do we do with Heaven? "Thank you, you're getting better and better but back to the bench". I think Heaven has earned the right to play. And I'd pair him with de Ligt.
He doesn't necessarily need to play at center back. Fergie (and Mourinho) often played center backs at fullback - think Wes Brown or Branislav Ivanovic. Think he could rotate at left back with Dorgu. I don't think Shaw has the legs to play there anymore (or at least gets injured whenever he does)
Amad is having a breakout tournament that will be alerting clubs to his talent, if he comes back here and is not a starter, he will have reason to look elsewhere and not waste his time at a club that’s not acknowledging his standing. There’s a real fine line to keeping starting players happy, which is the problem when you are not playing enough games in a season to pacify the collective.What a great problem to have.
Competition, cover for injuries/ suspensions/ loss of form and options from the bench.
This is not an issue, it’s a positive.
Amads not being dropped when he's our best attackerNo that's reasoning, it's still dropping Amad for Mainoo or Ugarte. Mount is another who will be impacted but I think he'll be happy enough with reduced minutes.
If we're not careful Amad will want out as he'll obviously have big clubs after him. He's a bigger profile than a sub for a top four team.
How on earth is it the obvious answer. He's probably in our top 3 best players
Don't understand this thinking at all. He is literally a normal right winger. 433, 4231, either way you play a right winger. He's the most natural winger in our squad.Amad will lose out. He's not been great in the #10 role in Amorim's system because he's usually too far from the ball. The wingback role isn't a perfect fit for him, but it suits him to pick up possession from deep. I don't think he'll perform well on the right in a 4-2-3-1 and his long term future is probably away from the club unless United appoint another back 3 coach like Glasner.
Don't understand this thinking at all. He is literally a normal right winger. 433, 4231, either way you play a right winger. He's the most natural winger in our squad.
Mbeumo is an off the ball threat as a wide forward, Cunha is a creator who likes drifting into pockets of space, amad is the only one who is a proper winger who gets wide, runs at defenders with the ball and makes things happen. He's an easy start.
Rashford......Seriously ? For me, I don't want him anywhere near our club after his obnoxious behaviourIt'll be Amad or Sesko this season, with this being our likely attack:
Mbeumo...Bruno...Cunha
Sesko
Or
Amad...Bruno...Cunha
Mbeumo
I expect Bruno will leave next season, and I'd like to see Cunha then play through the middle with our playmaking coming from deeper.
That'll free up the right wing, but Amad isn't particularly suited there.
Mbeumo...Cunha...Amad
Sesko
Maybe a place for Rashford when Barca inevitably back out of the permanent deal?![]()
You are looking at this as if you have to pick a group of players, and nothing then changes.Amad is having a breakout tournament that will be alerting clubs to his talent, if he comes back here and is not a starter, he will have reason to look elsewhere and not waste his time at a club that’s not acknowledging his standing. There’s a real fine line to keeping starting players happy, which is the problem when you are not playing enough games in a season to pacify the collective.
Options from the bench have to buy into that or they’ll be off at the earliest opportunity.
Another element to this is how you rate the players in the first place; for some an Amad is our first or second most talented player; he’s obviously a starter for such folk. For others, he’s a default sub whom they think needs to usurp Mbeumo to get playing time.
Once you’re back on top as a club, you can call the shots and dare players to leave as you’ve the top table of player “happy” to come to your club and fight for their place. We’re not going to be of that calibre for a while yet.
I’m mentioning Amad because he seems to be the fall guy - I think only a Mount will be OK with being a non-starter, perhaps Sesko, too as he currently has no standing, but the others, I don’t think it will be well received if they’re chosen to sit.
Amad will lose out. He's not been great in the #10 role in Amorim's system because he's usually too far from the ball. The wingback role isn't a perfect fit for him, but it suits him to pick up possession from deep. I don't think he'll perform well on the right in a 4-2-3-1 and his long term future is probably away from the club unless United appoint another back 3 coach like Glasner
We do have a selection dilemma along the front three among four, five if you count Mount as a front line player.Sesko vs Cunha will be the 9. Ole during his time here played Martial often, but he also went with Cavani the other half of the time. I'd say Cunha and Sesko are both pretty similar in style as those 2 players. Cunha himself plays that role and position for the Brazil national team.
I honestly don't see Amad not playing when fit. He provides something nobody else does in our squad, Ole brought him in 6 years ago or so, and he's our best performing wide player coming off a brilliant AFCON now. Sure they'll rotate a bit, but I think Amad will be seen as the most important front 3 player pretty quickly while Mbeumo, Cunha and Sesko primarily fight for the other 2. But it's a good problem, it's actually a very healthy grouping for a front 3 to have those 4, Mount and Zirkzee being a distant 5th. You need options to challenge and come in off the bench and it's not a clear 1st choice thing, just like it's hard to say at Man City who will be their first choice wingers when they have Semenyo, Doku, Foden, cherki and Marmoush to pick from.
Yeah. It's a standard selection competition and having bench options which is as important as the starters. It's not a clear 3, it'll change game to game and they'll all get chances whether it's starting or off the bench.We do have a selection dilemma along the front three among four, five if you count Mount as a front line player.
As everyone here already knows, Sesko has not sunk his teeth into the bit yet, but he’s not been far off the target in recent matches. We can’t play all five of Cunha, Mbeumo, Amad, Sesko and Mount, but rather than torture ourselves over this question the best answer is undoubtedly playing whoever is in form. And if that means Cunha at 9 with Mbeumo left and Amad right, over vice verse, so be it.
Edit: wait no, Fletcher wasn't Amorim's assistant, was he? So unlikely to keep his principles. Probably still gonna do something similar in terms of formation though, when the team's at full strenght. Gets all the best attacking players on the pitch in a way that makes senseThe plot twist is that Fletcher plays Amorim's system.