Who had the best transfer window?

Botim

Full Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2017
Messages
663
Supports
Royal Antwerp FC
As the title says. Some contenders:

Man Utd:
You can't look past three world class players in one window.
On the downside, hardly sold anyone and didn't add a crucial piece in midfield.

Aston Villa:
Lost Grealish, but invested wisely. Danny Ings is a very capable midtable striker. Buendia and Leon Bailey are solid as well. Plus they added Ashley Young for some experience and Tuanzebe as an option from the bench.

Leicester City:
Added some useful players in Vestergaard, Bertrand and Soumare.
More importantly, they didn't lose Ndidi, Tielemans or any of their other important players.

Chelsea:
Two big additions and a healthy window on the selling side.

Lots of other teams had a solid window, including Spurs, West Ham and Leeds.

Arsenal is the strangest one. Spend more than anyone else, yet they don't seem to have really improved that much.

Our other title rivals had just the one big transfer.
 

RedDevilRoshi

Full Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2017
Messages
13,201
Us with Chelsea a very close 2nd.

Getting no DM is annoying but if you said to me at the start of the window we’d be signing Sancho, Varane & Ronaldo, I’d be saying you’ve been playing way too much FIFA career mode.
 

Peyroteo

Professional Ronaldo PR Guy
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
10,884
Location
Porto, Portugal
Supports
Sporting CP
United had the best transfer window since they got 3 great players while Chelsea only got 2. The difference is that United didn't address the problem in midfield while Chelsea don't really have a position that lacks quality in their squad anymore.
 

Paolo Di Canio

"we have to realise it's a doggy dog market"
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
6,966
Location
Sliema, Malta
I think City downgraded personally, Do not think Grealish is anything better then what they have, infact, Foden on the left over Grealish IMO
 

peridigm

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
13,837
Us with Chelsea a very close 2nd.

Getting no DM is annoying but if you said to me at the start of the window we’d be signing Sancho, Varane & Ronaldo, I’d be saying you’ve been playing way too much FIFA career mode.
I think we inquired about Rice but he's waiting for Chelsea. Could be wrong but I recall seeing he is a Chelsea fan and all that. Not that players don't move to other clubs but it could hold true if he ends up there next season.
Not arsed we missed out on Camavinga. Didn't want to come here by all accounts and he's young and not very experienced. I feel Ole would not have played him much anyway and he could have been thinking about DVB riding the bench and thought, feck that!

I think we had a window not many expected. Sancho was expected but Varane and Ronaldo came out of nowhere really. We've been linked with Varane forever but I don't recall us being linked with him until his contact situation came up so, yeah, came out of nowhere.

Glad we sold James. Seems a good young man but not what we needed. Annoyed we didn't sell others. Stop giving deadwood new contracts FFS. If you're not going to play them, move them on. It's not a charity.
 

Dr. Dwayne

Self proclaimed tagline king.
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
97,473
Location
Nearer my Cas, to thee
Sancho, Varane and Ronaldo. It's not even debatable who had the best window.

Even without Ronaldo United killed it. Varane was a massive pick up. No other club brought in a player as good as him.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,575
I think we inquired about Rice but he's waiting for Chelsea. Could be wrong but I recall seeing he is a Chelsea fan and all that. Not that players don't move to other clubs but it could hold true if he ends up there next season.
Not arsed we missed out on Camavinga. Didn't want to come here by all accounts and he's young and not very experienced. I feel Ole would not have played him much anyway and he could have been thinking about DVB riding the bench and thought, feck that!

I think we had a window not many expected. Sancho was expected but Varane and Ronaldo came out of nowhere really. We've been linked with Varane forever but I don't recall us being linked with him until his contact situation came up so, yeah, came out of nowhere.

Glad we sold James. Seems a good young man but not what we needed. Annoyed we didn't sell others. Stop giving deadwood new contracts FFS. If you're not going to play them, move them on. It's not a charity.
Well at least when he finally snubs us for them Ole will finally look at sensible alternative cheaper options like Bissouma/Tchouameni because when Pogba leaves we will still need money to fund a replacement as well. I haven't included Ndidi because pretty certain that Leicester will want similar money for him than West Ham for Rice.
 

Blood Mage

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
5,923
Chelsea had a close to perfect transfer window, although missing out on Kounde was a blow for them. He might have made them title favourites.
 

Orc

Pretended to be a United fan for two years
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
5,322
Supports
Chelsea
United and Chelsea are the only big teams that considerably improved.

Excluding the big boys, both West Ham and Leicester had excellent windows.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,575
United and Chelsea are the only big teams that considerably improved.

Excluding the big boys, both West Ham and Leicester had excellent windows.
You lot edged it for me because addressed your biggest issue whereas we still have a major problem at CDM which will cost us
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,815
Us by a significant margin. The only club in world football who had a window on par with us is PSG. No other club had a window that even comes close.
 

Betson

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
2,283
We can't really complain about our own window , on paper we have greatly improved the quality of the squad , disappointing we did not go all out and get that quality DM that might make us realistic title contenders. I think we will regret that.

Chelsea also done well this window.
 

krazyrobus

Full Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Messages
4,741
you think Midfield was a weak spot? after striker i thought it was obvious that CB was the next area of weakness
They have one of the best defences out there. I personally consider Georginho the weaklink.
 

sincher

"I will cry if Rooney leaves"
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
25,588
Location
YSC
Leicester did well I think. Daka, Soumare and Vestergaard all look like astute purchases.

We probably did well, bit harder to say. Sancho might take a bit of time to flourish. Ronaldo's impact may not be all positive, but could of course be huge.

City bought one of the best players in the league so hard to argue with that. Glad they didn't get Kane or Ronaldo.

Chelsea's business made sense, they needed a striker and there aren't many around that fit the profile. Glad they didn't get Haaland. They will challenge for the title.

Liverpool don't really have issues that needed transfers despite the fans' outcry. Maybe a bit odd they weren't in for Saul though. But Van Dijk coming back is huge and Elliott is more promising than Jones.

Spurs and Arsenal both look like a mixed bag. Also not sure about West Ham spending big on Zouma and Vlasic who both look short of the top level to me.
 

Flytan

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,754
Location
United States
Chelsea by miles. Filled holes in the squad and even signed players to positions that may be weak in a year or two. It's extraordinary.

Us second.

Arsenal 3rd, just have to wait a year or two for those players to mature/also get a good manager.

City 4th
 

ayushreddevil9

Foootball hinders the adrenaline of transfers.
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
10,263
United had the best transfer window since they got 3 great players while Chelsea only got 2. The difference is that United didn't address the problem in midfield while Chelsea don't really have a position that lacks quality in their squad anymore.
And that will come back to bite us in the arse as games are mostly won in midfield.

Chelsea addressed all the holes in their squad, CB still could have been icing on the cake for them but they don't have any weakness anymore whereas we are stuck with 4231 and McFred for another year.
 
Last edited:

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,575
Chelsea by miles. Filled holes in the squad and even signed players to positions that may be weak in a year or two. It's extraordinary.

Us second.

Arsenal 3rd, just have to wait a year or two for those players to mature/also get a good manager.

City 4th
Yeah extraordinarily easy to do when money is of no object and FFP are just words on a bit of paper
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,575
And that will come back to bite us in the arse as the team is as games are won in midfield.

Chelsea addressed all the holes in their squad, CB still could have been icing on the cake for them but they don't have any weakness anymore whereas we are stuck with 4231 and McFred for another year.
Yeah Ole, Carrick & Mckenna could well be made to find out the hard way just how costly that decision proves to be
 

Flytan

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,754
Location
United States
Yeah extraordinarily easy to do when money is of no object and FFP are just words on a bit of paper
Yeah obviously. Don't disagree with any of that at all. Still as long as it's allowed, don't have much choice but to think it's the best.
 

sincher

"I will cry if Rooney leaves"
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
25,588
Location
YSC
Chelsea had a close to perfect transfer window, although missing out on Kounde was a blow for them. He might have made them title favourites.
Perfect would have been Haaland. Lukaku makes sense give they couldn't get him but he definitely has limitations. Saul has quality but Atletico happy to let him go... shades of Thiago to Liverpool perhaps? They still lack creativity sometimes too...
 

ChaddyP

Full Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
13,852
Location
Jamaica
They have one of the best defences out there. I personally consider Georginho the weaklink.
I think they lack individual quality in defence. Koude would have been perfect for them especially as a Zouma replacement. I think Jorginho is class especially for them
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,575
Utd have that chance to make it a 10/10 window next summer but second signing hinges on what happens with Pogba, so if he leaves personally we may well have to pass on Haaland and buy BOTH a CDM and playmaking CM, however if somehow he stays then obviously all in for Haaland and FINALLY get that CDM to secure things nicely in front of Harry & Rapha
 

Diabovermelho

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
121
Definitely United. We are the only team in England that brought in 3 world class players. And also in europe, together with PSG.

Shame it wasn't a 10/10 for us.

But there's no way Chelsea had a better window. CR7>Lukaku. Also, Saul doesn't improve them, he's bench, together with Kovacic. And they failed to bring a CB after selling Zouma.
 

SmithLogic

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 31, 2018
Messages
43
Imagine getting Varane and Ronaldo for basically the same price as Ben White. Just imagine it. Oh wait….
 

SecondFig

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
6,521
Location
▲ You Are Here
Chelsea by miles. Filled holes in the squad and even signed players to positions that may be weak in a year or two. It's extraordinary.

Us second.

Arsenal 3rd, just have to wait a year or two for those players to mature/also get a good manager.

City 4th
Agree on Chelsea and us.

Think West Ham have had a decent summer (Zouma and Vlasic plus Kral on loan) - but they could really have done with another striker. Leicester's looks solid too.

Not convinced by Arsenal's - they don't look any stronger now than they did in May, and they've spent a lot. That said, they have moved on some ageing high earners (Willian and David Luiz) and have reduced the age of their squad... Maybe with a better manager they could challenge for top 6 but they're still absolutely miles off the top-4
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,356
Supports
Chelsea
you think Midfield was a weak spot? after striker i thought it was obvious that CB was the next area of weakness
We brought Chalobah into the squad, and for his sake, I kinda wanted the Kounde deal to collapse. I couldn't see where the minutes would come for him if we added Kounde to the team, so I'm glad that deal didn't happen.
 

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
Arsenal without a shadow of a doubt. Brought in 5 or 6 really talented youngsters who will all contribute in their fight to stay in the Premier league
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
In terms of quality of signings, it’s between us and PSG

Man Utd:
Ronaldo - GOAT
Sancho - best young playmaker WF in Europe
Varane - worldclass CB

PSG:
Messi - GOAT
Donnamurra - best keeper in Euro
Wijnaldum - top class DM
Hakimi - top class RB

In terms of filling the holes in the squad, probably Chelsea.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
52,653
Location
Founder of IhateMakeleles.org and Gourcufffanboysa
4 best for me:

Manchester United. Fixed the most pressing needs in the team. Center defence and a dead right wing. People cock sure midfield is an Achilles heel will be in for a nasty surprise.

Chelsea: brought in a lead striker. Brought in the missing midfielder. Decent window

PSG. Took their squad to a higher level
Added a super keeper. The experience of Ramos to center defence. Hakimi and Nuno Mendes as fullbacks. The excellent Winjauldim in the middle. Plus the incredible Messi upfront. Inspite of being set to lose mbappe for free. Possibly in a year. They have done well. They now truly lack nothing.

Poch simply has to win it all with what he has.
 
Last edited:

Ole's screen

Full Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2020
Messages
926
Location
Right next to Ole’s seat
Supports
KC Chiefs
I think Spurs had a quietly good summer. I think quite a few teams have strengthened in the PL. As a result of the pandemic the PL is the only league really making money and the quality up and down the league is immense. I wouldn't be surprised if the top 4 are all really close together and the points total is on the low side with lots of teams taking points off everyone.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,578
Location
india
Us followed by Chelsea. We added a top goalscorer, CB and a hugely talented RW, three weaknesses upgraded in a summer. Only question is whether midfield will prove to be a problem this year and something we should have prioritised.

Who all have Spurs signed? If someone can list their signings. Gil and Romero seem to be good additions.
 

therealtboy

New Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
783
Location
Dubai
Supports
Feyenoord
Chelsea by miles? Why do you guys always have this grass is greener approach? We signed Sancho, Ronaldo and Varane. I'm lost. It's not even a debate. The CM not being signed is a minus but cmon we signed a better winger than any Chelsea have, a better striker than Chelsea have and a better CB than Chelsea have, we had the best window comfortably. Now Chelsea has a solid squad and are incredibly well coached, their midfield is better(defensively) but trust me, once we are playing at full tilt in the coming months and everyone has beded in, our team will be blowing teams away for fun. We have the second best player in the world, to add to an incredibly talented squad, cmon guys you're acting like because we didn't sign Neves or Rice we are weak.
 
Last edited:

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,578
Location
india
Surely you mean pleasant surprise?
Chief feels the defence was holding the midfield back which isn't actually a problem. So the people he argues with on this topic will get a slap on their faces this coming season. Hence, nasty and not pleasant :lol: