Exactly. Eriksen was better till 2018 after that he was on a massive decline, even at Inter he wasn't at his best .fecking hell Eriksen doesn’t half get overrated on here. He isn’t anywhere near the player he was in 2018, and he fell of a cliff big time then.
Some banter account starts some moronic thing on twitter, people copy them religiously into their posts.If Eriksen hits and hopes as much as Bruno does, his numbers would dwarf Bruno's.
ThisIf Eriksen hits and hopes as much as Bruno does, his numbers would dwarf Bruno's. He has been a completely different level of talent to Bruno at every stage of their careers. Bruno has lucked into an absurd number of penalties in the last few years which inflates his numbers. How much was he rated before this?
Their productivity as attacking midfielders are more than good enough respectively, but as footballers, Eriksen has always been better. He could do everything Bruno could with much more control. Take out penalties, and Eriksen's career numbers betters Bruno's, and numbers are only ever Bruno's argument.
Apparently if you kick and hope you can.Bruno. You don’t get his numbers by accident.
Bruno is at the age now as the start of Eriksen’s very sharp decline. Eriksen before that yeah, he was pretty great, but he’s not been at that level for 4 years, what’s to suggest he’s capable of getting back there?Today I don't know but at the same stage of their careers I would say Eriksen. Eriksen is a better technician, tactician and today the question is about his athleticism. To some extent I would say that Bruno is a sort of Dele Alli and I don't know if he is better than the better version of Alli.
People will drool over played like Trent’s numbers but Bruno’s is just as impressive. It’s shocking how vilified Bruno has become on here, it really is.Apparently if you kick and hope you can.
KdB is the best 10 in the league, after that David Silva.Thinking about them both at their best, I'd take Eriksen (~2017) but they're different players really. Beyond the odd nice pass, Bruno does all of his damage almost exclusively in the final third. Eriksen is a lot better at controlling the tempo of the game from midfield but can still do just as much damage in the final third.
I don't think there's any shame in that though. Beyond Silva, Eriksen was probably the best #10 in the league in the 2010s.
Who copied who? Expected someone to make this retort and not surprised to see it. It's a pretty easy one. Eriksen is one player who has as much ability to put up much better numbers if every footballer in the world had Fernandes' mentality. Eriksen's career numbers are as good anyway for what it's worth.Some banter account starts some moronic thing on twitter, people copy them religiously into their posts.
Eriksen might be better player, Eriksen might be creating more chances with his willy than Bruno creating chances with this strongest foot. Doesn't change "kick and hope" nonsense.Who copied who? Expected someone to make this retort and not surprised to see it. It's a pretty easy one. Eriksen is one player who has as much ability to put up much better numbers if every footballer in the world had Fernandes' mentality. Eriksen's career numbers are as good anyway for what it's worth.
I hope Eriksen and De Jong joins. Plenty of Manchester United fans seem to have forgotten what midfielders in football play like.
Bruno being 'better these days' looks like one and half seasons with us and another one and half in Portugal in a three-year period he converted 34 penalties to Eriksen's 0 penalties in his last days at Spurs, and in a period he was trying to find his feet in a title winning team.Eriksen's numbers were fantastic for years, hit more than 10 assists in the league 4 seasons running.
People act like Bruno has been dominating the league for years, he had one very good year and then followed it with an appalling one. The jury is still out if he can function in a team where he isn't the focal point of attack.
Considering that goals and assists are only ever Bruno's argument, in his best four consecutive league seasons, he returned 0.68 non-penalty goals or assists. Eriksen in his best four consecutive league seasons returned 0.60 non-penalty goals and assists every 90 minutes. That's an extra 3 goal involvement in a 38 game season. Basically the same level, and the first of Bruno's four was in Eriksen's third season.Eriksen has never been at the level of peak Bruno
Like what?Bruno can do some things better than anybody.
Guy bagged up a bunch of pens for 6 months and now we’re doing “peak Bruno” talk? WowEriksen has never been at the level of peak Bruno
Bruno is a very good player but he doesn't put insane numbers and he hasn't shown that he is better at winning games.Better at football as in all round game? Eriksen.
Better at winning games and putting up insane numbers, Bruno has the highest potential in the squad for that.
20 times better than Eriksen? He must be the best player that ever lived then.Bruno is like 20 times better than Eriksen. End of story.