Let me get it straight, rangnick needed to go aswell. However that doesn't mean he did more damage than ole. Now lets get into your points:-
You only brought up stats. Stats are stats and they show rangnick got 0.04 points more than ole using ole's own assembled and coached team.
Stats include every game this season including cup competitions.
Apart from winning and losing games you can also draw games. Thats why points per match is used.
You want to ignore 3 seasons under ole v few months under rangnick ? You think that's a fair comparison ? I think not.
Them players were bitching and moaning about ole aswell. You think we should support players bitching and moaning because rangnick asked them to train in the evening ?
Stick to points per match over the entire season instead of taking out win percentages arbitrarily from in between the season. An ridiculous example - ole had a 0% win rate in november (
)
I'd take dalot over awb everyday unless you want to play counter attacking football like we've been doing for a few years without anything to show for it. Dalot wasn't playing when the dippers ran riot at ot and smashed us 5 nil, what happened then ?
No shit! So did rangnick.