Bearded One
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2017
- Messages
- 1,245
Every attempt to place Klopp’s record ahead of Pep’s is reliant on downplaying what Pep did at Barca, making them the most dominant team in a generation. That is not what a rookie manager would usually be associated with doing. There have been so many “new Messi’s” who never achieved their potential. The man guided Messi to become arguably the GOAT the way Fergie guided CR7 to become another GOAT. Stopped the influence of people that could derail him, made sure Messi overcame his recurring injuries and sent packing the more talented players he met. It all worked perfectly and it’s only with hindsight that we can say he took a generational team and conquered with them.I'd say he's already outperformed Pep. Winning a PL title & qualifying for 2 CL finals (winning 1) on the budget he's had compared to Pep is outstanding. Pep has vastly outperformed him in the minor cups but this is down to the squad depth he has. Klopp has nowhere near the depth to compete on 4 fronts so has to bin the minor cups.
Guardiola has himself said he needs high quality players to make his system work. He would have never made it work at Liverpool as he wouldn't have been given the budget that he required. It took Klopp a long time (in todays standards) to win a title. Even then it was only possible due to selling Coutinho so he could spend money on the different areas he needed to improve. Guardiola would throw his toys out of the pram if he was told he would have to sell to buy.
The PL is less competitive than it has ever been. It was actually more competitive during our period of dominance. We had SAF on one hand but on the other we were outspent by other clubs most seasons. We really shouldn't have won as much as we did when we were so consistently outmuscled financially. The managers in the PL during our dominant period were also so much better. You had the likes of Allardyce & Pulis at the smaller clubs & then peak Wenger Mourino et al at the bigger clubs.
The PL has become the top league due to the demise of Milan, Barca & Real due to their financial issues. The City & Liverpool of today would struggle against the Milan, Barca & Real of the 90's/2000's.
What Klopp has done with Liverpool is very impressive, mind but to place it over and above the best of Pep will take dishonesty on my part for me to concur to. City have got the money - Arab wealth - yes but even when you look at monies spent, because everyone knows City can afford most players, there is a sort of differentiated price system that works against them. I’d argue that if it was City that went for Diogo Jotta, they’d spend considerably more than Liverpool spent and if it was Liverpool that went for a Mendy for example, the price would be closer
The difference in quality of their teams is not considerably much but money spent tends to make it appear like this is the case. Klopp won the CL yes, but Di Matteo did as well. The deciding factor for me goes beyond who won what but if one person dominates the game for a considerable period, then that one deserves the acknowledgment. Pep has not just won, he has dominated wherever he’s been.
Conte won the league in his first season where Pep failed and Klopp didn’t exactly inspire but fast forward to few years Klopp has overtaken Conte. It’s not just a one off event but when you put consider all the events, not explaining some away, then the answer would not be far fetched imo.