In the Premier League without penalties,Brunos goals and assists are a lot better than Giggs and Scholes ever had - and they actually had decent players around them. He already has that as far as I am concerned
Whatever about Giggs being a dickhead, he's up there with Charlton as our biggest all time legends.Nope
Why are you removing penalties?In the Premier League without penalties,
Giggs had a goal or an assist every 170 minutes, he played 46450 minutes
Bruno has a goal or an assist every 184 minutes, he played 16622 minutes
Scholes had a goal or an assist every 214 minutes, he played 36098 minutes
That's not a lot better. Giggs' record is insane considering he started as a teenager and retired at 40.
Well even if you remove his penalties - Giggs over his long career had Cantona, Nistelrooy, Van Persie, Scholes, Rooney, Ronaldo etc to aim his passes at while playing for the best team in the P.L - Bruno ... well...enough said. So I am not trying to diminish Giggs or Scholes' career - or saying that Bruno is better, but if you look at stats alone - Bruno's impress me more than Giggs and Scholes.In the Premier League without penalties,
Giggs had a goal or an assist every 170 minutes, he played 46450 minutes
Bruno has a goal or an assist every 184 minutes, he played 16622 minutes
Scholes had a goal or an assist every 214 minutes, he played 36098 minutes
That's not a lot better. Giggs' record is insane considering he started as a teenager and retired at 40.
At the same time, Bruno has been the only creative outlet at United over the last few years, where the ball has to go through him. That was never the case during Giggs' days, yet he was involved in a huge number of goals. While we're providing context, we're also ignoring that Scholes played far from the goal for a significant part of his career. Anyway, my main point of contention is that Bruno's stats are a lot better than theirs, which is not factual.Well even if you remove his penalties - Giggs over his long career had Cantona, Nistelrooy, Van Persie, Scholes, Rooney, Ronaldo etc to aim his passes at while playing for the best team in the P.L - Bruno ... well...enough said. So I am not trying to diminish Giggs or Scholes' career - or saying that Bruno is better, but if you look at stats alone - Bruno's impress me more than Giggs and Scholes.
In the Premier League without penalties,
Giggs had a goal or an assist every 170 minutes, he played 46450 minutes
Bruno has a goal or an assist every 184 minutes, he played 16622 minutes
Scholes had a goal or an assist every 214 minutes, he played 36098 minutes
That's not a lot better. Giggs' record is insane considering he started as a teenager and retired at 40.
But they are, aren't they? You just removed penalties to suit your narrative.At the same time, Bruno has been the only creative outlet at United over the last few years, where the ball has to go through him. That was never the case during Giggs' days, yet he was involved in a huge number of goals. While we're providing context, we're also ignoring that Scholes played far from the goal for a significant part of his career. Anyway, my main point of contention is that Bruno's stats are a lot better than theirs, which is not factual.
