Would football be boring or utopian if we didn't have negative/defensive managers?

Discussion in 'Football Forum' started by Fortitude, Apr 19, 2018.

  1. Apr 19, 2018
    #1

    Fortitude TV/Monitor Expert Scout

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Messages:
    10,769
    Location:
    Inside right
    Apart from Simeone, it seems as though defensive managers get an awful lot of stick these days, far more than at any other time I can remember.

    It doesn't seem like the art of defending or masterfully shutting up shop has any place in the modern-day footballing mindset. Is this true?

    I'll say for my own club and its history of attacking that it's been easy throughout the years to appreciate that kind of football from a distance and a certain level of detachment beings as it had very little to do with us. I'll always enjoy that kind of football at tournaments, too, more from the perspective of seeing which teams will be good enough to breach the seemingly unbreachable as it's a measure of both the attackers and defenders on show. I think Chelsea vs. Barcelona in both their peaks might be the pinnacle of that this century so far, actually.

    Anyway, where do you stand regarding this? Would football be more of a spectacle with an improvement in attacking over defending or would it then become an undiluted mess?
  2. Apr 19, 2018
    #2

    InfiniteBoredom Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Messages:
    9,968
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Defensive football can be fun to watch as a neutral, but if your team play it then it’s not.

    When you are invested in the outcome of the match, it’s obvious you’d want the ball to stay as far away as often from your box as possible.

    Generally, I’d say no. Football would still be fun, it’d just be a different experience.
  3. Apr 19, 2018
    #3

    BluesJr Full Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2013
    Messages:
    4,513
    You’re definitely right, the ‘efficient’ method has never been more unpopular than it is now and those tactics are ridiculed on a daily basis.

    I think the game has changed a little, the number of goals scored is rising and more and more people just want attacking free flowing football. Social media feeds into this as well, the perception from the media is that Spurs and Liverpool are much better teams than us despite us being comfortably ahead in the table.

    I think football needs both, but if I’m honest I’d rather we didn’t lean on the defensive side when coming up against our rivals.
  4. Apr 19, 2018
    #4

    golden_blunder Site admin. Manchester United fan Staff

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2000
    Messages:
    93,820
    Location:
    Dublin, Ireland
    The only reason Simeone is not getting stuck for the style is because he’s not at a big club
  5. Apr 19, 2018
    #5

    CA_vampire New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2017
    Messages:
    977
    Location:
    California
    I know that most people will disagree with me on this, but a nicely executed defensive master-plan is very entertaining to watch! I will never forget the two CL games between Mourinho's Inter and the tiki-taka Barca! :wenger:
  6. Apr 19, 2018
    #6

    Mohamed Salah New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2018
    Messages:
    7
    Supports:
    Merseyside Red FC
    First post here after lurking for some time. People are generally hypocrite when it comes to this.

    For example if a team like Palace play expansive football against any of the big 6, they will be walloped by 5 to 6 goals every match. The spanish giants are the biggest hypocrite around. Before the last match that we had in Nou Camp they start with LFC are negative etc etc. Our team under Rafa was nowhere as good as Barca.

    So should we have Messi etc have a field day or should we be compact as Rafa did and kill them on the counter?

    Saying which I am sorry to say that i lost interest of the football under Houllier. It was bad and I fell asleep a few times during matches. Seeing your matches now under JoMo reminds me of the dark last Houllier days.
  7. Apr 21, 2018
    #7

    _00_deathscar New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2016
    Messages:
    115
    Supports:
    Liverpool
    You mean in 2006-2007 yea?

    Thought we played the perfect away game - kept it compact, kept Ronaldinho and Messi (albeit a very young Messi) quiet and hit them on the break.

    The return leg we actually did a Man City on them. Absolutely walloped them in the first 45 but couldn't hit the net - think we hit the post a couple of times and Valdes made some superb saves; could have been 2-0 or 3-0 up very easily in that half. They won 1-0 but it wasn't enough for them.
  8. Apr 21, 2018
    #8

    P-Nut fan of well-known French footballer Fabinho

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2015
    Messages:
    15,709
    Location:
    Oldham, Greater Manchester
    I enjoy watching excellent defensive football. Some of the Italian sides over the years have been masters at it.

    Stopping some of the great attacking talents in world football can be a joy to watch at times. But I tend to agree with the thought process that, if it's your team consistently playing that way you will become bored of it.

    It has its place in big games, top teams coming up against other top sides. A defensive masterclass there can be great, but when a top team does it against a lesser side you begin to expect more.
  9. Apr 21, 2018
    #9

    Sky1981 Fending off the urge

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    22,812
    Location:
    Under the bright neon lights of sincity
    I enjoy watching the team i support wins

    if they don't win then it's no fun for me, regardless of how well they play
  10. Apr 21, 2018
    #10

    Mockney Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Messages:
    38,891
    Location:
    Editing my own posts.
    Not to excuse some of the dross we’ve played this year, but yeah, I’m kind of the mind that the sort of counter attacking masterclass with which Ancelotti’s Real beat Pep’s Bayern only a couple years back, would potentially now be considered a grudgingly admirable but unsporting tactical cheat.

    Ultimately I think the Pep/Klopp influence on the PL is a net gain... but it’s important to keep our boots on the ground.
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2018
  11. Apr 21, 2018
    #11

    Emrethis Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2015
    Messages:
    233
    You get the old English first division.

    There's a reason why the English league became the most popular league in the world. The English league didn't have the best players, coaches or tacticians. But people liked to see both teams going at it with their pride at stake. Most people didn't like to watch a tactical game because it was boring.

    I grew up on English football and if you're an English football man (or woman), isn't it about end to end attacking football, strong (and highly questionable) tackles flying in left and right, and passionate (but mostly angry) footballers confronting referees? These things that get you off your seat and your blood pumping.

    What's this about tactical and defensive football? Does anybody actually get off their seat and scream 'Oh my goodness! Look at that pristine defensive formation, the opposition can't break through!'

    I respect that some people may like the defending. But come on, we watch English football.
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2018
  12. Apr 21, 2018
    #12

    abdo99 Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2016
    Messages:
    11,748
    Make no mistake the art of defending is starting to become lost slowly. We live in a day and age where defenders are judged on their ability on the ball rather than their defensive contribution and goalkeepers need to be able to pass the ball instead of actually being good goalkeepers. If I was a manager my team would be capable of both fluid attacking football and also being able to shut up shop when we need to. I don't understand why it has to be one or the other. Give teams more to think about. The Arsenal teams of old were exquisite at times going forward but they also had a steely attitude towards defending and knew what needed to be done to win. But you're right there hasn't been a time where defending is looked down upon like it is now which is sad.
  13. Apr 21, 2018
    #13

    el3mel Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2016
    Messages:
    28,541
    Location:
    Egypt
    He has enough good players to allow him to play offensive football if he wants but he just doesn't want.

    For the op, there are just different ways to play football and people need to accept that.
  14. Apr 21, 2018
    #14

    tenpoless Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2014
    Messages:
    3,135
    Location:
    *Teleports behind you*
    I enjoy the tactical side of football, not really about defensive or attacking but more about how to expose your opponent's weakness while covering your own. So with that in mind, yes football will be really boring if every manager instructs the players to always attack because the better side with better players will always win the game, bar a few mistakes or anomalies. With "defensive" approach however there's still a chance for the 'inferior' sides. Different approaches make football much more unpredictable, I love it.
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2018
  15. Apr 21, 2018
    #15

    norm87cro New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2017
    Messages:
    405
    Location:
    Split, HR
    Approaches and tactics change during football history. Football doesn't belong to anyone therefore it is a bit silly to label offensive football as better or worse for than more defensive approaches. Personally I find football beautiful because of its versatility
  16. Apr 21, 2018
    #16

    B20 HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2003
    Messages:
    23,791
    Location:
    Disney Land
    Supports:
    Liverpool
    I was fine with Rafas brand of defensive football. It was matched to intelligent attacking football and more often than not he was actually quite positive in his approach.

    Houllier's brand of defensive football, though I stomached it at the time, was in hindsight dull as dishwater and not acceptable, really.
  17. Apr 21, 2018
    #17

    Red Indian Chief Torn Rubber Thus says Kemo

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2002
    Messages:
    48,099
    Location:
    Founder of IhateMakeleles.org and Gourcufffanboysa
    The notion that football would be 'Utopia' with only attacking managers is laughable. Only people who love PC and play station easy mode in which you can wallop teams by 4 goals every match like such nonsense. True football utopia would see everyone able to successfully marry all three aspects if football successfully regardless of personnel. Namely defence, attack and tactics.
  18. Apr 21, 2018
    #18

    Smores Full Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    19,163
    I'm not really sure its a recent trend. In general fullbacks in this league have become more attacking, we don't do wingers anymore they're all wideforwards and instead of the old two man midfield with both box to box the middle has instead become congested with defensive/attacking roles.

    I'm a fan of the old 442 as it brought both sides to the game and would love us to play it every now and again but i think tactically its had it's day and theplayers aren't there anymore. Pogba one of the most well rounded midfielders refuses to put in any shift or discipline comparable to Scholes or Keane and Martial thinks himself too good to track back like Giggs. Generation showboat
  19. Apr 21, 2018
    #19

    GhastlyHun Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2015
    Messages:
    8,963
    Location:
    Bavaria
    Supports:
    Bayern München
    Football would be silly without managers and teams valuing a strong defense. Matches would approach handball scores and take the thrill away from the individual goals.
  20. Apr 21, 2018
    #20

    Keeps It tidy Hates Messi

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2013
    Messages:
    17,639
    Location:
    New York
    Attacking and defending are not really entirely separate concepts. Like high pressing is often an attacking strategy and possession is often a defensive strategy.
  21. Apr 21, 2018
    #21

    golden_blunder Site admin. Manchester United fan Staff

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2000
    Messages:
    93,820
    Location:
    Dublin, Ireland
    I remember loads of people saying that if Rafa had taken the chains off a bit and allowed them to attack they may have won something more
  22. Apr 21, 2018
    #22

    golden_blunder Site admin. Manchester United fan Staff

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2000
    Messages:
    93,820
    Location:
    Dublin, Ireland
    You’re right that we’re not equipped for it
    But it can still work in the PL. Leicester played it when they won the league. Simple, fast football with the team playing for each other
  23. Apr 21, 2018
    #23

    Zlatattack Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2017
    Messages:
    4,570
    I don't mind parking the bus against Barcelona and hitting them on the counter. What kills me is when we do it against Stoke and Bristol City.
  24. Apr 21, 2018
    #24

    VeevaVee despite the protests, wears Ugg boots Scout

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    33,722
    Location:
    Manchester
    I'm of the opinion it's ok for teams in the lower half of the table. If you're in the top half or top 6 and want to play defensively, at least be able to counter and attack well too. If anything to me that's complete football. Good at defending and attacking, and not negative.
  25. Apr 21, 2018
    #25

    B20 HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2003
    Messages:
    23,791
    Location:
    Disney Land
    Supports:
    Liverpool
    Probably. But that is a matter of the efficiency of the approach not how palatable it is.
  26. Apr 21, 2018
    #26

    Rifer Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2017
    Messages:
    4,285
    Location:
    Losing to Comeback Winning!
    Football would be boring without them.

    Football utopian is a good balance of all attack, defense and tactics all at the highest levels.

    Attacks <-> Defense
    (It's not actually a separation, rather both interlink with one another eg. counter attack, attacking with strong organized defense at the back, defensive with good set-piece threat, etc.)

    There are also the idea on timing, tactical changes and transitions in games.

    All of these are fun:
    • Attacking vs Attacking ~ thrilling end to end game. (45%)
    • Attacking vs Defensive ~ unlocking solid defense and repelling attack waves are both fun. (45%)
    • Defensive vs Defensive ~ chess style of game. (10%)
    Depending on fans and their general preferences thus the leagues and clubs specifics.
    I don't mind football everywhere overall having 'em all, rather prefer to have a good balance of those, makes the game interesting.

    ---

    That said, specifically for us Manchester United... only in some specific games I don't mind we're playing defensive emphasis football.

    1. European games (Champions League and EL depends) against top teams only. No need to play with that approach against majority of the other teams.

    2. Domestic games (EPL and cup games), similarly there is no longer any need to do so. Up until last season, don't mind few games defensive mode against some of the top team on top form, but from this season onward, we're strong enough to be more attacking or at least more balance, depending on form. Never defensive against small teams.

    Against top team - balance approach (around 15% of the total games)
    Against small teams - attacking approach (around 85% of the total games)

    *Shutting up shop in the final minutes is a common acceptable tactic to defend and hold lead.​