onetwo3oclock4oclockrock
Full Member
Won the game. Clean sheet. 6-2 shots on target, 11-7 shots total, 57-43 possession. Strong opponent. Pogba, Mctominay and Rashford (most of the match) not playing. Everyone; Whine, whine, whine. Terrible fans.
Who's "Bramserud"?I still stand by what i said. How did you conclude i hate Bramserud by that?
All Norwegians on this forum paint a pretty picture of him and support him, they would wouldn't they?there seems to be a lot of incorrect info there.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/ole...e-winning-manager.452216/page-3#post-25033201
the above post from a Norwegian fan gives context to Ole's time at Molde, and actually the whole thread is informative in that matter due to the context provided by some Norwegian posters here.
Or maybe just fans with the foresight to see that we are going absolutely fecking nowhere with Solskjær in charge.Won the game. Clean sheet. 6-2 shots on target, 11-7 shots total, 57-43 possession. Strong opponent. Pogba, Mctominay and Rashford (most of the match) not playing. Everyone; Whine, whine, whine. Terrible fans.
only the Norwegians watch the Norwegian league, so I don't know who would understand the context better than them.All Norwegians on this forum paint a pretty picture of him and support him, they would wouldn't they?
So 2 players who are injured already didn't play while the other got injured once he entered the pitch and apparently this is considered a positive thing.Won the game. Clean sheet. 6-2 shots on target, 11-7 shots total, 57-43 possession. Strong opponent. Pogba, Mctominay and Rashford (most of the match) not playing. Everyone; Whine, whine, whine. Terrible fans.
Why would they? DId all the Scottish fans on here support Moyes?All Norwegians on this forum paint a pretty picture of him and support him, they would wouldn't they?
There have been as many posts in the Ole Permanent Manager thread since full time as there have been in the post-match thread. 4 pages in both. Why is it equally as important to have the same argument about Ole over and over again as it is to talk about the actual football? Its because winning the unwinnable Ole argument is more interesting to many than discussing the game - its secondary to many. Its why they get accusations of wanting United to lose games just so they can throw fresh ammunition behind it. Wins are boring, unless you really believe that we saw enough fresh evidence last night to restart the discussion about whether he should stay or go. All I saw was a moderately entertaining 1-0 win against pretty good opposition to advance in the cup. We learnt some things about the team - nothing new about the manager.When posters complain after a loss: "the Ole out brigade is back in full force"
When posters complain after a win: "we just won, why are you complaining?"
Moral of the story, we apparently have no right to show any dissatisfaction towards the coaching staff.
It is too late to sack him anyway and most of the managers would not take the job in the second half of the season anyway. So let him finish this season with his absurdly small squad and hire Poch from the start of the next season. Lets hope Ed is not that stupid to not hire him while he is free and we have semiamateur Olé for no reason what so ever. We should have had already agreed contract by Poch by now, same story like we had with Mourinho when LvG was struggeling in his second season.Since Spurs 4th Demember: WWWDWLWWLDLWW
Let's forget this thread for now people, no Manchester United board will or should be firing a manager with that form. There were huge questions marks up until December, and then again after Watford. But looking at the past month and a half (13 games), things have picked up to an acceptable enough level to keep the manager in the job for now.
If the form drops off a cliff again and we are way off 4th, let's revisit, else let's revisit in the Summer.
I am with you on this one. I really hope that this is our plan. Keeping Ole until the end of the season and the thankfully send him off without keeping him would be my wish. We need another Manager to bring us back or closer to the top two. Looking back on this year I don't see us doing so with Ole in charge. But I think he did a lot of good work but if we really want to go back to the top we need a real manager. Not an extended caretaker in my opinion.If there could be an option of keep Ole until the end of season, promote him higher in the club and bring in Poch, all with Ole already knowing this, that would be my vote.
Why on Earth would you reward him with an even more senior position? What makes you think he'd be any better at that role?Such a tough one, I choose not to vote. This is Ole, I love the guy, ever since I was a kid.
If there could be an option of keep Ole until the end of season, promote him higher in the club and bring in Poch, all with Ole already knowing this, that would be my vote.
The problem with having OGS in a Dof role is this silly obession with looking only for british players. Most of the best talents in the world aren't british and they are cheaper too.Why on Earth would you reward him with an even more senior position? What makes you think he'd be any better at that role?
I like his moves in the transfer market so far, has a plan, has an idea of what Manchester United is and what a Manchester United player should be. Would share the same idea with Poch on how we should play and has a good stature/standing in the game.Why on Earth would you reward him with an even more senior position? What makes you think he'd be any better at that role?
What exactly have his signings displayed to give such trust in his transfer strategy?I like his moves in the transfer market so far, has a plan, has an idea of what Manchester United is and what a Manchester United player should be. Would share the same idea with Poch on how we should play and has a good stature/standing in the game.
You are aware of our firm interest in Bruno Fernandes right, and our bid for Haaland? The silly obsession you allude to is just something that you've made up.The problem with having OGS in a Dof role is this silly obession with looking only for british players. Most of the best talents in the world aren't british and they are cheaper too.
Good post. 8 wins from 13, and still people are banging the Ole out drum every single day. What a waste of everybody's timeSince Spurs 4th Demember: WWWDWLWWLDLWW
Let's forget this thread for now people, no Manchester United board will or should be firing a manager with that form. There were huge questions marks up until December, and then again after Watford. But looking at the past month and a half (13 games), things have picked up to an acceptable enough level to keep the manager in the job for now.
If the form drops off a cliff again and we are way off 4th, let's revisit, else let's revisit in the Summer.
Why don't you look at the signings without the price paid? Would you rather we signed shitter players then Maguire for half the money spent because it would appease your Accounts at the end of the financial year?What exactly have his signings displayed to give such trust in his transfer strategy?
Maguire flatters to deceive and we overpaid massively for him. Similarly we overpaid for AWB, a player who I like but who i think will ultimately become a backup for us. Despite initially being impressed by James I actually now see him as a very limited footballer who should not be starting for a club with aspirations to be the best.
It's one of the constant defences of Solksjaer, "his signings have been good" but without our rose tinted glasses on have they really improved us significantly and made us better? I'd state no, despite them (James aside) being upgrades in the respective positions on paper.
Your first post summed up a lot of the problems. You struggle to distinguish between Ole the player and Ole the manager and I would suggest this has influenced your opinion on his job and overall performance.
I don't believe he has improved us. The only one of the three signings who is a distinct upgrade on his predecessor is AWB.Why don't you look at the signings without the price paid? Would you rather we signed shitter players then Maguire for half the money spent because it would appease your Accounts at the end of the financial year?
Have the signings improved us? The answer is yes, simple as.
Had we not signed Maguire, did you see that defensive performance against City without him? That's where we would be.
Our points total says our business during the Summer hasn’t improved us, the opposite in fact.Have the signings improved us? The answer is yes, simple as.
That's a wrong way to look at it. Had we not signed Maguire Smalling would have been playing against City. The real question is had our defense improved massively by replacing Smalling by Maguire ? The answer is not really. Our defense hasn't improved. We have the second worst defense in terms of goals conceded among the top 6, second to only Chelsea. We concede about pretty much every game. We had 4 clean sheets in the league out of 22 matches. Of course not to mention the entire squad looks in a much weaker state after that summer market than how it looked like in his first 3 months in charge.Why don't you look at the signings without the price paid? Would you rather we signed shitter players then Maguire for half the money spent because it would appease your Accounts at the end of the financial year?
Have the signings improved us? The answer is yes, simple as.
Had we not signed Maguire, did you see that defensive performance against City without him? That's where we would be.
Last season we averaged 1.42 goals against per match (54 in 38 games), this season 1.13 (25 in 22 games). So the numbers do suggest there's been an improvement.Our defense hasn't improved.
So we're on the course of finishing the season with +40 goals conceded. Hardly the type of improvement you'll expect on signing a 80m player.Last season we averaged 1.42 goals against per match (54 in 38 games), this season 1.13 (25 in 22 games). So the numbers do suggest there's been an improvement.
You're rightYou are aware of our firm interest in Bruno Fernandes right, and our bid for Haaland? The silly obsession you allude to is just something that you've made up.
So you claim the defence hasn't improved. He presents stats that clearly show that it has, and now you say it hasn't improved enough? OkaySo we're on the course of finishing the season with +40 goals conceded. Hardly the type of improvement you'll expect on signing a 80m player.
British fans like British players in a British league. This “silly obsession” is called good business.The problem with having OGS in a Dof role is this silly obession with looking only for british players. Most of the best talents in the world aren't british and they are cheaper too.
Brilliant. They would rather spend £30m on a CB who they have never seen play, is good on FIFA so they think he will be better than ones we have.Why don't you look at the signings without the price paid? Would you rather we signed shitter players then Maguire for half the money spent because it would appease your Accounts at the end of the financial year?
Have the signings improved us? The answer is yes, simple as.
Had we not signed Maguire, did you see that defensive performance against City without him? That's where we would be.
Defensive line has obviously improved. Overall our defense isn't where some people want it because of our problems in midfield. But to claim our defensive line hasn’t improved is silly.So you claim the defence hasn't improved. He presents stats that clearly show that it has, and now you say it hasn't improved enough? Okay
I just don't want us to miss out on the Toure's, aguero's, silva's, henry's, ronaldo's and Messi's of this world because they are not british.British fans like British players in a British league. This “silly obsession” is called good business.
It is not British League. It is an English League. It is not good business either. Manchester United has more fans out of England than in England. Almost all United fans want the best players for United. Most of our best players have been non English.British fans like British players in a British league. This “silly obsession” is called good business.