Zidane want a manager for 10 years in some obscure league, neither he was a failure in lower La Liga side before taking over Real.
how many managers did Barca change after Pep?
you can go on and discredit Poch all you want but the truth is his credentials beat the shit out of Ole’s.
So? Still he had no manager experience and still got job. Therefore, people talking about "what has Solskjaer done before" should look at those examples and see that you don't need to have CV full of titles to make something at a big club.
I'm not discrediting Pochettino. I like him. And he is good manager. But people are making it like he is some kind of manager demon. At least we should wait until he has won something. Anything.
The difference with Zidane is Zidane took over in January and finished 1 point behind barça in the league and the small matter of him winning the CL.
In his first full season he did the double winning la liga and CL.
How is this relevant to what Ole is doing?
Relevant, because of discussion "what has Solskjaer done". Before ManUtd.
In general nobody expects you to win the title or the CL when you manage Spurs or Southampton. He does however have a very record of overachieving with the budget at his disposal. I guess a FA Cup could be lacking, but there is a reason why Poch is highly rated as a manager and rated much higher than Solskjær. I don't think he'll come in and be our Saf, but I think of all the avaible candidates atm he is the best one.
He overachived with Southampton. He did absolutly nothing in Espanyol and left them in relegation. With Tottenham, he did improve them, but that improvement was not that big looking at Tottenham before him. So overachiving is a strong word. I would say slightly improved.
I think the argument ''Poch hasnt won anything!'' is such a ridiculous easy argument.
While it is true that he hasnt won anything, getting to the CL final and challenging for the title with a Spurs team he build up over the years is, in my opinion, more impressive than winning a title. Put Poch in charge of PSG, Juventus, Bayern or Manchester City and he will win things and the whole argument of not winning titles is gone. He isnt any worse than any of those managers but he didnt have the luck to be hired by one of those teams (yet). Sarri never won anything before he won the FA cup with Chelsea. Was he the moment he won that cup a better manager? I doubt it. Would Juventus not have hired him if he lost that game?
Winning a title doesnt somehow make you a better manager, i think 'the journey' is more important to show your qualities as a manager than to win the very last game. Especially in a sport like football where the best doesnt always win the game. Ofcourse you want to win a title in the end but if you keep getting to the final you will most likely eventually win one. Klopp for example lost multiple CL finals, it didnt make him a worse manage and now he is CL winning manager.
Put anyone, including me and you in PSG or Bayern and they would win. Those leagues are finished before they even starts.
I agree that winning doen't neccessery makes you better coach. You can be great coach in low teams. And you can be bad coach in great teams. There is element of luck where destiny takes you. But in football, titles count.