Yes, sell him. He's not good enough. We need to get away from keeping players for years and years in the hope that they'll eventually come good. All the while, they're gradually losing transfer value and contributing to the dressing culture of entitlement, unearned wealth and the false sense that they've "made it".
It might end up being a mistake. I doubt it, but that's always the risk. Either way, it's a risk we need to take more often because United will get it right more than they get it wrong. Under Woodward, it was the opposite.
I think one of our problems is how lacksadisical we have been to address problems like this.
Sancho has been poor in his time with us, his performances have not been up to scratch.
Would you expect a top team to persist with a player who hasn't shown anything in two seasons? no
People seem to have a false perception of what we are as a club. Fergie didn't give players offering nothing time. A poor performer was usually flogged off after a season of poor performances. Veron wasn't a poor performer, Forlan wasn't a poor performer, Anderson wasn't a poor performer. They played well, but were not as good as expected. Someone like Antony hasn't been a poor performer, just not good, but still contributing. Sancho has been terrible, and us giving him time, given how horrible our attack was this season, shows our problem.
As a club, we're too lenient with poor performances. The questions that needs to be asked are:
1. Can he be a dominant performer for either flank based on performances - No
2. Can you trust him to have a good performance against poor to average opposition - No
3. Is he impactful off the bench - No
Then why is he here?