Martial is clearly not good enough though, so signing Kane or Haaland would push him down the pecking order, and with his attitude he would then end up pushed out of the club. Selling him or using him and money to buy Kane would be a good idea.I prefer to get Lewandowski or Benzema, if Haaland ends up at the respective clubs. I’d probably prefer Aguero over Giroud, too.
With Mason, Martial, and Rashford, I don’t see us spending 100m on Kane or Haaland, nor should we, so I agree that we might need an interim solution.
Suggested this before. Yes, i think he's a very good option.I'm surprised - what other strikers can come in as a stop gap, be a lethal threat in the opposition box, not be injury prone and be happy with a squad role (Giroud I imagine is frustrated at Chelsea at getting virtually no time. I'm assuming he at least wants to be considered in rotational capacity at least)?
I mean it's likely we won't go for Haaland this summer as it seems far fetched. It's also unlikely Levy will sell us Kane. So what options are we left with?
I think we could do a lot worse.
This.. just get a top striker in and let's have for once someone who comes up with 25 goals plus.We have signed too many stop gap strikers since Ferguson retired.
Only signed one who was an attempt at a long term solution in Lukaku and he is gone. If we sign another stop gap striker we have to sign Sancho