Oranges038
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2020
- Messages
- 21,649
Correct. 29th March
Cheers, I'll have a look and see if I can work it out.
Correct. 29th March
Missed Holmgaard being injured. Dammit. Need to get rid.Good for her.
Leicester have signed Alisha Lehmann too. I've put her in my FF (£4.5m) instead.of Holmgaard, who is injured.
Katie Zelem has moved to West Ham on loan from London City Lionesses. I know she hasn't made many starts for LCL so I guess this is a move she wants.
I've been saving my Zelem shirt all season for precisely that game! Sucks, maybe next year!That’s a shame. I was looking forward to seeing her back at LSV but she won’t get a chance to play there this season.
I saw that rumour. As you say - that would suck. Much as I like our right backs, Ona was and is special and in my mind she's still ours.Strong rumours that Ona Batlle is going to join Arsenal in the summer. That would suck so much tbh.
Think her partner lives in London, so it’s either Chelsea or Arsenal for her I guesssArsenal already have one of the best RBs in the game, so this doesn't make sense to me unless they are concerned about Emily Fox leaving. Everyone wants more depth at every position, of course, but you don't sign Ona Batlle for "depth."
Well, that would explain why she would like to move to Arsenal. The question is why Arsenal would be willing to shell out the dough to bring her in.Think her partner lives in London, so it’s either Chelsea or Arsenal for her I guesss![]()
That City Chelsea scoreline is wild. Chelsea fans calling for Sonia Bompastor to be sacked
It would be a shame if we were to beat them to it wouldn't it!!It is, but ive got a feeling theyre concentrating on the champions league and if they win it this season they'll take that and not winning the premier league
I agree that Chelsea are focused on the CL and probably resigned to "just" finishing top-three in the WSL.It is, but ive got a feeling theyre concentrating on the champions league and if they win it this season they'll take that and not winning the premier league
As for City I'm a bit surprised by the high scoreline but not surprised that they're contuing on strongly towards winning the league.
McCabe is hard as nails in her tackling and I always thought refs are less likely to let the more physical contact go in the NWSL than the WSL. She’d be sent off every other game.I see that Arsenal have decided not to renew Katie McCabe's contract, and that several WSL and NWSL teams are interested in her. I think the style of play in the NWSL would really suit her and hope she comes over here.
This helps to explain why Arsenal are keen to sign Ona Batlle, who is four years younger than McCabe.
Because we really do not need her.Well if we're hurt by Ona going to Arsenal, why not a cheeky bid for McCabe ourselves?
That's what I think too. As I see it, the only weakness we have at the moment is the combination of (1) Toone being absent and (2) Wangerheim not yet hitting her stride, and hopefully both of these problems will be resolved pretty soon.Because we really do not need her.
While I agree that is nice to have, McCabe is unlikely to come if she knows she's signing to spend time on the bench. She has the pick of all the clubs around so she'll go where she will start games more often than not. NWSL is probably more likely.The only rebuttal I have (and the only reason to consider McCabe or someone of her ilk) is we do still need squad depth, particularly if we want to compete on four fronts. Experienced depth is a good thing too (as demonstrated by Rolfo this season). Our fullbacks are all young (especially if you consider George more centre back cover as she has been this season).
Did not see this coming
Oh no, a City win would have ended the season today. As it is, the title race is on!It would have been better for us if Arsenal had lost, I think, but it was worth it to see City get taken to school.
I cannot comment on the game as I did not see it. As for the result I have mixed feelings. I agree with @AmarilloMike that a City win would put them out of sight, but it would also have kept Arsenal behind us when they inevitably win their game in hand against Leicester next week.I watched Arsenal beat City today and was really impressed with Arsenal. Slegers started Olivia Smith at the 9, with Russo behind her, and it paid off. Meanwhile, their defense took Shaw, Miedema, and Kerolin completely out of the game; their only attacker who saw a lot of the ball was Hemp, but Emily Fox was having none of it. Also, it was great fun for me (as a USWNT fan) to see Sam Coffey play the second half, during which City seemed to play much better than in the first half.
Anyway, the real reason I'm posting about this match is that, if I understood the commentators correctly, this was something like the 11th or 12 consecutive game in which City have started the exact same XI. Must be nice to not have to play WCL matches, huh? It's a lot easier to maintain a well-oiled machine if you don't have to rotate.
It would have been better for us if Arsenal had lost, I think, but it was worth it to see City get taken to school.
I watched Arsenal beat City today and was really impressed with Arsenal. Slegers started Olivia Smith at the 9, with Russo behind her, and it paid off. Meanwhile, their defense took Shaw, Miedema, and Kerolin completely out of the game; their only attacker who saw a lot of the ball was Hemp, but Emily Fox was having none of it. Also, it was great fun for me (as a USWNT fan) to see Sam Coffey play the second half, during which City seemed to play much better than in the first half.
Anyway, the real reason I'm posting about this match is that, if I understood the commentators correctly, this was something like the 11th or 12 consecutive game in which City have started the exact same XI. Must be nice to not have to play WCL matches, huh? It's a lot easier to maintain a well-oiled machine if you don't have to rotate.
It would have been better for us if Arsenal had lost, I think, but it was worth it to see City get taken to school.
Given that her twin daughters are part of the Spurs u-14 side, and that Madonna is 67, I think it is a safe bet that they are adopted!I think this is appropriate given that the thread title includes the terms "WSL" and "miscellaneous."
I watched the match between Spurs and Chelsea last weekend, and was surprised when the camera panned occasionally to Madonna sitting in the stands. It turns out that she has twin (adopted, I think) daughters who are both enrolled in the Tottenham under-14 academy. So, Madonna is a "soccer mom." Try getting your head around that.
Incidentally, I also learned that Madonna is the same age as I am -- 67 -- and I'm not sure what to think about that. I can't decide whether it makes me feel young or if it makes me feel old.
