Xavi

Discussion in 'Football Forum' started by Eddy_JukeZ, Aug 27, 2019.

  1. Sep 8, 2019

    izec Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2013
    Messages:
    19,683
    Location:
    Lucilinburhuc
    Dont know how people can compare players at different positions and different times even. I mean Xavi and Zidane are two completely different players, playing in different teams, positions, systems and with different responsibilities. Peak Xavi was also at a time Zidane wasnt playing at all.
  2. Sep 8, 2019

    giorno Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2016
    Messages:
    13,746
    Supports:
    Real Madrid
    Let's. Zidane was a level above henry. Do you think iniesta was a level above henry?
  3. Sep 8, 2019

    tompo18 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2019
    Messages:
    2
    While Xavi was a wonderful player as mentioned earlier conditions needed to suit him.

    He was not a complete midfield player, wasn't great at shooting, wasn't great at heading the football for example.

    I always preferred Scholes, in my opinion he was more complete and for me more exciting to watch.
  4. Sep 8, 2019

    matbezlima New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2019
    Messages:
    99
    Yes, I think
  5. Sep 8, 2019

    matbezlima New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2019
    Messages:
    99
    You should search about Cruyff. A far worse loser than Xavi
  6. Sep 8, 2019

    A-man Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2017
    Messages:
    1,208
    Most people would say Cruyff was a great footballer, one of the greatest ever, but you just reduced him to "a far worse loser than Xavi". But you know, I'm fine with that as that's your opinion.
  7. Sep 8, 2019

    matbezlima New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2019
    Messages:
    99
    I regard Cruyff as the greatest european footballer ever. I was just talking about his arrogant personality.
  8. Sep 8, 2019

    A-man Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2017
    Messages:
    1,208
    I write that Xavi was great but a sore loser.
    You say that can only be written by someone very biased.

    You write that Cruyff was an even worse loser than Xavi. But that's not biased.

    Maybe think twice next time you try to educate other people on forum.
  9. Sep 8, 2019

    Zehner Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2018
    Messages:
    1,637
    Location:
    Germany
    Supports:
    Bayer 04 Leverkusen
    I see it like this: Iniesta is a superior football player ability-wise to Xavi - he's a better technician, a better through passer, a better dribbler and faster. Zidane again is an improvement on even Iniesta because he's an even better technician, a better dribbler, has greater passing range, poses a greater goal threat and on top of it also a very good header. However, I don't think any of Zidane's teams were as good as Iniesta's and Xavi's Barca and Spain and that has a lot to do with those two players. The way I see it, Zidane never had the impact for club or country Iniesta and Xavi had.

    However, what would things look like if Zidane had played under Guardiola and subordinated to his tactical instructions? He obviously would've had to adjust his playing style since he naturally took much more risk than those two and he wouldn't be allowed to lose the ball as often as he used to for the Galacticos. If he did, he'd arguably be even better than those two in their respective roles but we've never seen it and you can't give him credit for something he hasn't done.
    For me, this question is a very weird one. It feels natural to have Zidane among the very best of the sports (Cruyff, Beckenbauer, Best, Laudrup, Zico, Ronaldinho, that tier) and it doesn't for Xavi or Iniesta but on the other hand I think it is an absolutely fair opinion that those two were better than Zidane because they just elevated their teams to levels unknown before.

    I think in the end, I have all three roughly on par. Zidane is the one with the greatest individual skill, Xavi has the best decision making and is the best team player while Iniesta is a healthy mix of both. So for me, the real discussion is, where do Xavi and Iniesta rank in the pantheons of the greats, especially considering that they were completely overshadowed by a certain Messi throughout their best club seasons? After all, they were the two best players of what is quite commonly seen as the best national team in history. So I think this is actually a very fair argument for including them in the Zidane/Cruyff/Luadrup/Beckenbauer mold, isn't it?
  10. Sep 8, 2019

    Righteous Steps Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    525
    Neither were a level above Henry.
  11. Sep 8, 2019

    matbezlima New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2019
    Messages:
    99
    I did not accuse anyone of bias. I only said that Cruyff was even more of a sore loser than Xavi
  12. Sep 8, 2019

    matbezlima New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2019
    Messages:
    99
    For country, Zidane's impact can only be compared to Xavi and Iniesta together because Zidane was undisputably France's best player.

    Also, peak Xavi from his two first seasons under Guardiola was better than peak Iniesta for fantastic through passes. It was in the 2010-2011 season that Xavi took more of a backseat, controlling and retaining ball possession, to Iniesta, Dani Alves and Messi playing the key through balls instead. I mean, just look at those stats and performances of his 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 seasons that I posted in the previous page of this thread.
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2019
  13. Sep 8, 2019

    Casanova85 Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2018
    Messages:
    3,890
    Location:
    Northwestern Mediterranean
    Supports:
    Cruyff/SAF
    To be the best you need an arrogant ego bigger than a mountain. And please don't mention Messi: he's not humble. Bragging and arrogant are not necessarily similar concepts.

    And for the record, I think Scholes was better than/more similar to Iniesta. Xavi a different kind of MF (pacing,possession,passing).
  14. Sep 8, 2019

    giorno Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2016
    Messages:
    13,746
    Supports:
    Real Madrid
    Zidane quite clearly was the better player. Even at 34 in the last few games of his career he had a higher level performance in him than henry ffs
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2019
  15. Sep 8, 2019

    giorno Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2016
    Messages:
    13,746
    Supports:
    Real Madrid
    Uhm, Xavi and Iniesta played together...what kind of comparison is that?
    Quite commonly? You are literally the first person i've ever seen calling 2008-12 spain the best national team in history. Most people wouldn't even put them above 3 different iterations of Brazil....
  16. Sep 8, 2019

    Pow Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,042
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Supports:
    Chelsea
    Zizou vs brazil in 06 was an amazing performance.
  17. Sep 8, 2019

    Zehner Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2018
    Messages:
    1,637
    Location:
    Germany
    Supports:
    Bayer 04 Leverkusen
    And Zidane played with Thuram, Makelele, Henry, Trezeguet, Lizarazu, Deschamps and many more. He didn't win it singlehandedly but also had very, very good team mates. So yeah, I do think Xavi and Iniesta each had a greater impact on their national team than Zidane.

    That's from the Spanish national team's wikipedia site. So yeah, I'd say it's quite commonly agreed on that they are among the very best if not the best national team in history. I mean, they essentially did what Cruyff's total football team couldn't do, and they did thrice in a row. And that Dutch team is probably Spain's strongest contendor in this discussion. Other teams maybe the Hungarian team from 1954, Pele's Brazil, Zico's Brazil and possibly Germany 1974. I don't think any of them were better than Spain 2008-2012.
  18. Sep 8, 2019

    kouroux 45k posts to finally achieve this tagline

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2007
    Messages:
    75,289
    Location:
    Djibouti (La terre des braves)
    Using the Spanish national team wiki page for an argument ?
  19. Sep 8, 2019

    matbezlima New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2019
    Messages:
    99
    Brazil 1970 was easily superior
  20. Sep 8, 2019

    matbezlima New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2019
    Messages:
    99
    Iniesta is humble
  21. Sep 8, 2019

    Zehner Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2018
    Messages:
    1,637
    Location:
    Germany
    Supports:
    Bayer 04 Leverkusen
    Yes, in this case it's the perfect argument since it reflects common perception.
  22. Sep 8, 2019

    kouroux 45k posts to finally achieve this tagline

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2007
    Messages:
    75,289
    Location:
    Djibouti (La terre des braves)
    I am sorry but "common perception" is completely arbitrary
  23. Sep 8, 2019

    MadDogg Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,880
    Location:
    Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
    With the Xavi/Iniesta/Zidane comparisons in this thread:

    If you were picking a team to play over the course of a season, Xavi is the first midfielder picked. Simple as that. No midfielder that I've seen in 25 years or so has his influence, consistency and dominance.

    If you were picking a team to play a one-off match to determine the winner of everything, Zidane is arguably the first player picked over that same period of time (probably second to Messi). He was an incredible big-game player. He's certainly not in the reckoning for the 'full season' though, as he was always quite inconsistent and drifted in and out of most games.

    Iniesta was somewhere in between. Also an amazing big-game player but not quite at the level of Zidane, and his influence and consistency over the course of the season was fantastic but not quite at the level of Xavi.
  24. Sep 8, 2019

    A-man Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2017
    Messages:
    1,208
    Very sorry, my mistake.
  25. Sep 8, 2019

    Righteous Steps Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    525
    Yes because Henry was a forward who relied on pace, Zidane never had any, it was natural he would age more gracefully.

    At their primes though, its impossible to argue Zidane was a level above, in fact only a handful of phenoms, Messi, Pele, Maradona, R9 could be argued to be a level above Henry, and even that is an argument.
  26. Sep 8, 2019

    giorno Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2016
    Messages:
    13,746
    Supports:
    Real Madrid
    They played together for years while one was in his prime and the other at the end of his, and still it was very clear to anyone watching who was the best player on their team. Henry was still very much in his prime in 2006, in fact i'd argue that was the best year of his career, the first time he truly left a mark in european and international football. And Zidane was literally playing the last 7 games of his career. And it was still very clear that Zidane had a level in him Henry didn't come close to. And this at a point in time in which Henry was actually the better player, or at least was supposed to. Then the wc rolls around and france are Zidane+10. Funny how that works...

    Look up what their peers thought of them. Look up what managers and players and former managers and players still think of both of them

    @Zehner among the best, sure. You said commonly considered the best ever. And as i've said, you're literally the first and so far only person i've ever known to hold that opinion. Even in recent times brazil 2002 is generally held in higher regard than spain, in my experience
  27. Sep 8, 2019

    SilentStrike New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2014
    Messages:
    55
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Supports:
    Feyenoord
    Xavi has established himself among the first tier of Central midfielders

    Tier 1: Matthaus, Didi, Falcao, Xavi

    Tier 2: Neeskens, Breitner, Pirlo, Schweinsteiger etc.

    The comparisons to Henry or zidane make no sense
  28. Sep 9, 2019

    matbezlima New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2019
    Messages:
    99
    Pirlo is in the first tier. Best long passer ever and crazy game vision. A genius, at least one of the 10 or 5 best italian players ever. Probably the best playmaker of all time. Pure class
  29. Sep 9, 2019

    BlackShark_80 Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2016
    Messages:
    374
    I won't call Pirlo the best playmaker of all time, he is the best Regista/DLP in the last 30-40 years but the best ever? no chance.
  30. Sep 9, 2019

    matbezlima New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2019
    Messages:
    99
    Does anyone here have anything more to say about this post of mine, what you agree and what you disagree with it?
  31. Sep 9, 2019

    Cait Sith Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    1,192
    I don't think Whoscored is overly reliable for a CM.

    Xavi receives the ball from the centerbacks, is pressed hard, makes a pirouette to evade the pressure, advances the play by playing the ball forward between the lines to Messi, defenders pull out towards Messi, Alves starts a run, Messi passes back to Xavi, Xavi pings it over the top to Alves, Alves plays it sideways, Pedro shoots, goalkeeper saves.

    Key Pass: Alves
    Xavi: Nothing

    That's how Whoscored metrics works. "Key pass" = "pass leading to a shot".

    But even then it's unbelievable that an all-controlling central midfielder who starts to playmake from his own half also created as many chances as the best #10s in the world (and also all time) like Messi.

    As a comparison, Modric's (arguably best CM post Xavi/Iniesta era) best "key pass" statistic over a whole season is 1.9 per game. Also never got more than 6 assists. You just criticized Xavi for going down from 3.2 key passes in 09/10 to 2.5 key passes in 10/11 which still dwarves Modric's best season by 30 %.

    I don't remember any central midfielder in at least 20 years who was controlling the game through every minute but also got world class assists in 2 CL finals and 2 European Championship finals. There is usually the "controllers" like Pirlo or the chance creation machines like De Bruyne. Not both at once.
  32. Sep 9, 2019

    KirkDuyt Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2015
    Messages:
    10,526
    Location:
    Dutchland
    Supports:
    Feyenoord
    2010 Spain was nothing like Totaalvoetbal. Boring endless possession and winning every match with 1-0 is no wear near the same achievement. We demolished the opposition in 74. Granted we fecked up in the final, but that Spanish team are the most overrated bunch of twats in the history of sports.

    Yes, I do like hyperbole.

    And yes, I'm still mad over losing to them in the final.
  33. Sep 9, 2019

    Pink Moon Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2009
    Messages:
    6,789
    Supports:
    Celtic
    There's been 4 players at Barca alone all better than him in that department (Messi, Xavi, Iniesta, Laudrup)

    Pirlo was an excellent player but he became seriously overrated after that game against England in either the 2012 Euro's or 2014 World Cup.
  34. Sep 9, 2019

    Tostao_80 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    458
    Scholes better than Iniesta? The most laughable post of the day. Iniesta is regarded as one of the best European midfielders of the last 3 years. Nobody talks about Scholes in the same vein. What was he doing for England, when Andres was scoring a WC winning goal?
  35. Sep 9, 2019

    Casanova85 Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2018
    Messages:
    3,890
    Location:
    Northwestern Mediterranean
    Supports:
    Cruyff/SAF
    Sorry, but NT football is not the gold standard for me.

    And I just said Scholes was better than Iniesta, not miles better.
  36. Sep 9, 2019

    Casanova85 Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2018
    Messages:
    3,890
    Location:
    Northwestern Mediterranean
    Supports:
    Cruyff/SAF
    Christ, a dutchman still salty about 2010. Cruyff himself hated Netherlands 2010.
  37. Sep 9, 2019

    KirkDuyt Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2015
    Messages:
    10,526
    Location:
    Dutchland
    Supports:
    Feyenoord
    Of course he did, can't have him admit they equalled his own achievement by making the final.

    Cruijff was an amazing player, but also a self important twat. Not everything the man says is gospel. Well, unless you live in Amsterdam of course.
  38. Sep 9, 2019

    elnorte Freaky fly day

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    3,426
    Carrick for me
  39. Sep 9, 2019

    giorno Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2016
    Messages:
    13,746
    Supports:
    Real Madrid
    Pirlo and Xavi are remarkably similar actually, only real significant difference is Xavi was quicker and more dynamic, a better presser, and played on teams that emphasized control through possession
  40. Sep 9, 2019

    matbezlima New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2019
    Messages:
    99
    Fantastic answer! Thanks!