Difference seems to be that these clubs doing the big deals have players to sell, Madrid will no doubt offload a couple fo big names to fund these signings, Chelsea selling players they've stockpiled, PSG valuing Barcola is worth £100 million +.
Whereas United have a thin sqaud already and no one of note really to sell that we can afford to lose, so virtually all our outgoings are net spend.
Agree, only have to look at sales already made or likely/possible from likes of chelsea, spurs, real...if youre spending £150m and possibly selling £100m...spent less than us.
I do however disagree our squad is so thin...we have given big wages to players never justified them over a prolonged period and now cant sell them....but
Vitek, Amass, dalot, martinez, collyer, gore, zirkzee, amad...there are players of reasonable to pretty high value....thats £150-200m on top of mount, rashford sales
Not saying we should sell all, wont go into who i would and wouldnt as probably agsinst grain, but devils advocate...
Vitek wants move, we have three gk
Amass last year contract we have cover lb in leon and dorgu even if no signing
Dalot cheaper options can replace his sale
Martinez...contract, if hes injured isnt an option and what about faith in our other options
Collyer/gore wont play
Zirkzee people want to go, now worried about sesko injury...cunha and mbuemo cover, zirkzee barely played last year with same situation
Amad we have mbuemo and lacey
Rashford we are giving a pathway...why? Why not hardball of dont move dont play anywhere
Mount we seem to want to keep, he isnt a starter when fit anyway in our best eleven
There are reaspns to sell each and not enough faith for me on the likes of dorgu, lacey, heaven and yoro or other youngsters not yet featured.
But we CAN raise funds to pretty much fund a diomande, viniscus type signing...outside cm and rb for me...our squads not as paper thin as made out to me...we are just too loyal to some players too long i feel