BalanceUnAutreJoint
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2017
- Messages
- 1,522
Resign so that someone more competent can hopefully finally make this club take some steps forward
The dont want to tank the shares. They want to do well obviously but finance over football. Im not blaming them, they are business men not supporters. If they were serious about wanting trophies then they would just keep throwing money at it. Ala PSG, Real Madrid, Barca etc. Another 500, 700, 800 god knows what it would take. Or sell out to an Oil Baron. The questions was what would the Glazers do - and my answer was finance first. There is no way they can afford to win trophies except by fluke ala Leicester and Liverpool who took 20 years or whatever it is now. That cant be their priority. First priority is to keep the club finances healthy - they have done that. Second is to establish a goodish team- thats what the 600 mill should have bought. If that team turned out world beaters then that was a bonus. Not a priority. If they could figure out how to get us consistently fourth they would take that over spending another 200, 300 plus mill to challenge.Of course. That's why they've spent so much money on transfers in the last 6 years. It was a cunning plan all along to waste £600m and completely tank the value of the shares.
Doing anything else makes no financial sense.
What you are saying has been echoed by many people on here and is absolute tripe. They want to do well . . . . . but not that well. They want to spend money . . . . . but not that much money. They want to spend enough to finish 4th every season because that's not too expensive but finishing 1st is. It is one of the stupidest theories I have ever heard.The dont want to tank the shares. They want to do well obviously but finance over football. Im not blaming them, they are business men not supporters. If they were serious about wanting trophies then they would just keep throwing money at it. Ala PSG, Real Madrid, Barca etc. Another 500, 700, 800 god knows what it would take. Or sell out to an Oil Baron. The questions was what would the Glazers do - and my answer was finance first. There is no way they can afford to win trophies except by fluke ala Leicester and Liverpool who took 20 years or whatever it is now. That cant be their priority. First priority is to keep the club finances healthy - they have done that. Second is to establish a goodish team- thats what the 600 mill should have bought. If that team turned out world beaters then that was a bonus. Not a priority. If they could figure out how to get us consistently fourth they would take that over spending another 200, 300 plus mill to challenge.
How is it not hollow to "achieve" CL qualification, only to get knocked out by a poor Sevilla side with a whimper, and basically give up on the knockouts as soon as the draw was made the season after?Never said he didn’t deserve to go due to the fallout with players. But talk of “hollow achievement” is none sense. He won the Europa League and qualified for the CL, hows that a hollow achievement? The following season he finished second and qualified for the CL, did better then Klopp and Poch that year.
A hollow achievement is beating PSG, only to then not qualify for the CL.
That doesn't make sense at all because without appearing to challenge you don't get the biggest sponsorship deals and you also miss out on TV rights for CL etc. The sweet spot is a team that has the ability to consistently finish third and reach the CL quarters or semis but once you are good enough for that you are already challenging by default. The problem is that we haven't progressed over the last 6 years despite spending £900m on players.They don't want to challenge. It would make no financial sense to do so. It would take half a billion at least and even then there is no guarantee and even then what you get for winning won't return your half a billion. If you win the premier and champions league then what's that 100 mill prize money? They just need to make sure the fans don't riot by chucking them titbits every now and again and keep the financial business side of things going well.
I’m glad someone cracked itWow this was deep.
Me and my friend together couldn't crack it.
They don't want to challenge. It would make no financial sense to do so. It would take half a billion at least and even then there is no guarantee and even then what you get for winning won't return your half a billion. If you win the premier and champions league then what's that 100 mill prize money? They just need to make sure the fans don't riot by chucking them titbits every now and again and keep the financial business side of things going well.
Finally, someone who understands an Ed equaliser reference!Funny our CEO is Edward Woodward and we still couldn’t get a fecking equalizer
Sadly the wall is already taken. That's where he keeps the picture of the Olympiakos match.United have suffered more embarrassing defeats than what we saw today. Should display the league table on the wall instead.
Yeah, but we aren't doing that at the moment either.Just keep getting into Champions League every season, that is all they want.
The only thing he is probably thinking of expanding in the near future is his office if he continued to do that.Sadly the wall is already taken. That's where he keeps the picture of the Olympiakos match.
Yes. Just like the rest of us.if he isn't shitting himself, he fecking should be.
Good clear thinking. But what would you do about Woodward.
- Hire Jon Rudkin, the Leicester City's director of football as the chief football executive.
- Let him use the international break to audit and evaluate every aspect of the club's operations.
- Give him complete autonomy to either fire Ole or build a structure around him to make him successful.
- Scour the loan, free agent, transfer market to bolster the squad in January and hope to finish the season well.
- Continue the rebuild in the summer.
He can stay as the cheque book CEO as long as he doesn't start curtailing the power of the chief football executive or overrule him on transfers. If he was fine taking a backseat to different managers, there should be no issue for him to do that.Good clear thinking. But what would you do about Woodward.