Shopping Southampton

Trizy

New Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Messages
12,009
Clyne, Schneiderlin, Strootman and Depay/Reus would complete us imo but then we'd still need a top class centre back. Those four alone could take our spending close to or just above a hundred million pounds, a top class CB would take that figure closer to £150m and I don't know if the powers that be would allow Woodward to spend that much again. If this season ends with us attaining our major objective then we would need to sign those five players for depth, balance and general improvement so that we can at least hold our own in the CL.
Do we really need a RB though? Rafael on form (and injury free!) is one of the best in the league and Valencia has proved this season he's more than capable of being a RB back up.

LB we could do with backup although we have Blind and Rojo who can both play that position and would be now only for our other injuries, people keep talking about full backs but we don't really need them but if we were to buy a quality attacking LB then Ricardo Rodriguez is the man, he has 6 goals in all competitions in 15 games!

CB is where the money needs to be invested, we could pick up 2 quality CBs for £50 million in my opinion, even less if we opted towards Garay as one of them.

Strootman seems to be nailed on although I'm skeptical due to his injury

and finally a winger, Depay being the obvious and hopefully cheap option, although if Reus does not sign soon a £25 million buyout will come into effect and we should do everything in our power to sign him
 

Santos J

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Messages
7,368
Do we really need a RB though? Rafael on form (and injury free!) is one of the best in the league and Valencia has proved this season he's more than capable of being a RB back up.
Rafael injury free is a rarity though and Valencia is alright but we need a bit more than capable considering there's a good chance they'd be playing around half of our games with how often Rafa likes to pick up knocks.
 

itso 7

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,840
Location
harare,zimbabwe
Do we really need a RB though? Rafael on form (and injury free!) is one of the best in the league and Valencia has proved this season he's more than capable of being a RB back up.

LB we could do with backup although we have Blind and Rojo who can both play that position and would be now only for our other injuries, people keep talking about full backs but we don't really need them but if we were to buy a quality attacking LB then Ricardo Rodriguez is the man, he has 6 goals in all competitions in 15 games!

CB is where the money needs to be invested, we could pick up 2 quality CBs for £50 million in my opinion, even less if we opted towards Garay as one of them.

Strootman seems to be nailed on although I'm skeptical due to his injury

and finally a winger, Depay being the obvious and hopefully cheap option, although if Reus does not sign soon a £25 million buyout will come into effect and we should do everything in our power to sign him
I think the time has come for us to pla ahead with a more reliable option for the right back position because Rafael doesn't look like he will outgrow his fitness issues anytime soon.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,298
Location
Hope, We Lose
Valencia has been fine, might get found out on the big occasion but we'll see. Clyne would want to play every week, its really not a pressing concern for us
 

SonnyTheHaloPro

"Van Gaal is David Moyes +£150million"
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
2,661
Location
United Kingdom
I would absolutely love Schniederlin here, we would bring such control and power which we lack in midfield. He can play as the number 8 or 6 and is already use to the "pace" of the Premier League. We need some more warrior/leader type players and he ticks every box for me.

Clyne as well, if we have full backs we probably won't have to see this 3-5-2 rubbish every week. Have no idea what he'd cost but he has been very good this season, English as well so would help establish a core again.
 

Ringo 07

Full Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
5,615
Location
Schweiniesque
Harrison Reid was impressive in his debut in the 3-0 win over Everton on Saturday. He is tipped for big things. We definitely should sign Clyne.....I'm not sure if we have any interest in Schneiderlin but he would be nice but can't see it happening.....we have no chance of getting Reus as was mentioned in an earlier post
 

Ringo 07

Full Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
5,615
Location
Schweiniesque
Clyne would be a good back up for both Shaw and Rafael or first option when they are injured.. if not Clyne pay 40m for Azpilacueta....
Utter nonsence...Clyne would comfortably be ahead of injury prone Rafael....And Azpilacueta won't be coming here for any money....Mourinho only sells us players he has no interest in for vastly inflated amounts
 

Sean_RedDevil

Twitter bot
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
21,364
Location
NYC (Before Manchester+Hamburg)

m1y2

New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
5,226
Location
Prague
Utter nonsence...Clyne would comfortably be ahead of injury prone Rafael....And Azpilacueta won't be coming here for any money....Mourinho only sells us players he has no interest in for vastly inflated amounts
Every player has its value that was just a guess, silly money, would never pay that for him and I know they will not sell, but both players are great that they can cover both wings so we could have saved some wages. Rafael fit is comfortably better than anyone in the premier league but yes he is prone to injuries, so he could paly when he is fit and Clyne can play the other time, all of them three incl. Shaw could still have a lot of game time..
 

The Mitcher

connoisseur of pot noodles and sandwiches
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
19,602
Location
Manchester
Clyne turned us down because of game time and not wanting to be a back up, why the hell would he join us for the role he rejected?
 

Brightonian

Full Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
14,103
Location
Juanderlust
We all love Rafael but we can't rely on him. Clyne would still play 20+ games a season if we are in the CL.
You're still missing his point though. When fit, Rafael is comfortably the better player. So by definition Clyne would be second choice, which is a role he already turned down.
 

SonnyTheHaloPro

"Van Gaal is David Moyes +£150million"
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
2,661
Location
United Kingdom
Rafael isn't miles better than Clyne when fit, what on earth are you on about? It's like our players just like Liverpools become 10x better when Injured.

Clyne this season has been class, he would easily start over Rafael who let's face it, will probably never be fully fit for 40plus games anyway.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,949
Location
France
why the hell would he join us for the role he rejected?
If he has confidence in his own abilities, he will probably understand that he can take Rafael's place, since he is fitter and not far from Rafael's level.
Which can make him, take a different decision.

PS: When he refused us, he was a young championship player, playing for Crystal Palace, right ?
 

Sean_RedDevil

Twitter bot
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
21,364
Location
NYC (Before Manchester+Hamburg)
No he wouldn't, because when fit and on form, Rafael is miles better.
Again you don't get the point do you?!
He isn't miles ahead of Clyne......Clyne plays steadily very good football over the last 2 years and i haven't seen that of Rafael.

I haven't given up on Rafael's potential but he must stay fit and do more in the next months......otherwise new top-class RB and then it depends on Rafael to be second choice or he goes.

He isn't a kid anymore.....it is his 7th season!!!!!......he's not on the level he should be after so many years at the club.
The club must go back to the level of Real Madrid and Bayern Munich.....with a current Rafael that isn't possible.

I don't wanna say Clyne will be the player (I have 2-3 others over Clyne) but if anyone thinks Rafael is better than Clyne......then he must be blind.
 

Fahad Jawaid

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
1,193
Whenever i have seen Clyne, i have never seen whats so amazing about him, he's average going forward with a good shot on him, but Rafael is a different animal all together, we have seen Rafael being the best player in our side in plenty of matches, and how he improves our side going forward, with the talent we have in our squad only few right backs would be able to achieve that, i believe rather than spending 20 odd million on him, we should buy a competent rightback for 5 to 7 million bracket who can cover LB/RB, and then go for a CB all in.
 

Mciahel Goodman

Worst Werewolf Player of All Times
Staff
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
30,017
The real question for me is, Clyne or Coleman? Personally, I think Coleman would be the better signing.
 

Fahad Jawaid

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
1,193
And another thing, if we were to buy a player from Southampton it wud love it to be Schneiderlin.
 

manutddjw

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
3,702
Location
Canada
I don't see the point in buying Clyne. Rafael has his issues, but Valencia is more than adequate backup at RB. Between the 2 of them RB isn't a main area of concern.

When you factor in the cost it would take to land Clyne (at minimum 25 million) it doesn't seem worth it. He and Rafael are close to the same age and talent wise there isn't that much between them. For the money we'd have to spend, you'd want someone who is an upgrade, which Clyne isn't really.

Clyne's injury record is what separates them, but whose to say he wouldn't follow our other defenders lead and get injured. Shaw had a good injury record before we signed him too.
 

Gannicus

New Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
3,723
Clyne, a decent back, would be a misuse or presumably precious resources. Better to roll the dice on Varela, a player who's already on our books and who has looked very sharp.
 

NoPace

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
9,424
Alderweild would make some sense as a backup CB. Suited well enough to 3 at the back.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,374
Wanyama of course. Beast of a player and has the potential to reach Yaya toures level.
He'll never be anywhere near Yaya. The massive difference being Wanyama is nowhere near as effective going forward.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,374
We should have signed Clyne before he went to Southampton. We were linked for years and seemed like such an obvious (and very typically United like) transfer.

I don't rate him as highly as some appear to but I think he'd make a fantastic squad option with a view to maybe forcing his way into the first team.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,374
Ward-Prowse and Clyne. I think Schneiderlin is slightly below 'top 4' level.
Nonsense. He's brilliant. He's nailed on to move in the Summer to a bigger club so I guess we'll see soon enough.

Blind has made a really good start to his United career but Schneiderlin is Carrick's natural sucessor IMO.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,374
Rafael is definitely better defensively.
Agreed. Ridiculous how there are still so many people who think Rafa can't defend. He's actually an excellent defender for a fullback these days but his concentration occasionally lets him down - which is an issue with Clyne also.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,651
Location
London
The real question for me is, Clyne or Coleman? Personally, I think Coleman would be the better signing.
Coleman last season was at-least as good as Rafael on 12-13 (if not better). Clyne, while good, has never played on that level.

If we want a new first choice, it should be Coleman (assuming that we shop only in EPL). For a backup, Clyne would do fine, especially considering that he can play on both flanks.
 

WR10

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
5,644
Location
Dream
He'll never be anywhere near Yaya. The massive difference being Wanyama is nowhere near as effective going forward.
Yaya was never known for his effectiveness going forward. Yaya had almost 20 goals his whole career before he joined city at the age of ~27. He started in the same role as Wanyama up until he got to city where they started moulding him into a different beast. Wanyama has that same potential really.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,374
Yaya was never known for his effectiveness going forward. Yaya had almost 20 goals his whole career before he joined city at the age of ~27. He started in the same role as Wanyama up until he got to city where they started moulding him into a different beast. Wanyama has that same potential really.
Safe to say I disagree. Even though Yaya was the DM at Barca he always had sound technical ability in the way he looked after the ball. Wanyama doesn't show that at all, though he does excel at the defensive side of things obviously.