Ruben Amorim - Manchester United Head Coach | Thread locked during matches

Its not rocket science. I dont need 50 coaching badges to know that playing a right footed wing back at RWB and a left footed one at LWB is much more balanced than whatever the feck he's trying to do.
Yeah, like in PES! Easy, just swap, solved.
 
We've always looked good with Maz at RCB and Amad, RWB. Lots of nice triangles and enough tenacity. Not sure who should play RCM and RAM though. Mainoo and Bruno respectively? Or if we stick to the Bruno in CM experiment, I think I'd rather see Zirkzee over Mainoo.
Zirkzee change the game today, he finds space in between the lines, he’s much more of a 10/SS than a number 9
 
Good for them, too bad I don't find opinion of the regular fans as important as an actual professional manager's on that matter.
Were you of the same opinion when ETH played Maz at 10 over Amad?

Managers make mistakes, and sometimes they are obvious
 
Gabriel Clarke asking the right questions.

"Were players played in the wrong positions tonight?"

Amorim - "I dont agree"

Chirst on a bike. Delusional.
That’s not what was said. He asked if it improved once he put players in usual positions. I would disagree with that too because he didn’t change any players into their usual positions mid game.

Garnacho came on and stretched the game, Leicester tired. It was nothing to do with players moving into normal positions.
 
It wouldnt just have been an FA Cup defeat though, it would have been yet another one of a whole catalogue of really poor defeats under him and the end of any chance we have of playing in Europe next season.
We are still in the europa league
 
The big problem is most Managers would simply bench those players and replace them. We simply can't.
True, but I doubt most managers would line up like we did tonight. I have no clue what Amorim is trying to achieve but what do I know.
 
See this is just delusion to be honest. We can all see he isn't up to it.


Well it’s part of a reason yes he’s correct but there’s more to it also. He’s not going to destroy the lads confidence obviously . Wouldn’t expect you to see that though :lol:
 
There's a lot of valid discussion and criticism you can make of systems, but I've seen this type of thing from us for so long now where we do nothing in the first half, go a goal down and then play a bit better and snatch a win. It's actually not really that different to some games Ole and EtH managed over. I don't know why this side rarely ever starts games well.
 
Clearly doesn’t realise how broke the club is, no cup win, No European football next season, no £200m investment to buy the players he needs to implement his system.
I know yes and I thought we could do without him if a big enough bid (£60 million) came in.

Now I just get snide comments from @hellhunter and others every time he does something remotely positive.

It's quite weird.
 
The abysmul run of results under him along absoutely ridiculous team selection and getting outplayed by one of the worst teams in the league at home yet again is deserving of the sack but the offside goal probably saved him.
Again, it's you wishing he'd be sacked. He absolutely would not have been sacked if we lost that game tonight.
 
Last edited:
See this is just delusion to be honest. We can all see he isn't up to it.



I agree partly with this statement but players also need a striker that makes runs into space and is available to receive the ball the few times they do try and supply him instead of wrestling with the fecking oppositions back 4 all game.
 
Were you of the same opinion when ETH played Maz at 10 over Amad?

Managers make mistakes, and sometimes they are obvious
Waste of time engaging in conversation with that guy. He thinks every manager's word is law because they're managers. He was a ETH supporter too. Never mind how the team is doing on the pitch, the manager is always right. As deluded as the duds we've hired as manager in the last 12 years.
 
United only ever seem to play football in second halfs when the team loosens up a bit from the original plan. He’s actually proven to be quite good at in-game subs to change it - the problem is the initial tactics nearly always completely misfires. It’s an issue.
 
I know yes and I thought we could do without him if a big enough bid (£60 million) came in.

Now I just get snide comments from @hellhunter and others every time he does something remotely positive.

It's quite weird.
No no, I'm not mocking you for him playing well, just for you being so cocksure that he's gone :D
 
Well it’s part of a reason yes he’s correct but there’s more to it also. He’s not going to destroy the lads confidence obviously . Wouldn’t expect you to see that though :lol:

Doesn't have to be delusion, perhaps he just doesn't want to go hard on Hojlund. Did it with Rashford but no need to do it with Hojlund imo.

What's he supposed to do, say he's not up to it?

All I see here is a manager saying that we aren't creating enough for our striker to score goals.. not sure what you see.

What's wrong with what he said? Every time out wide players play the ball it's to midfield runners. That's if they don't take the shot for themselves
Fair enough yes I understand he's being diplomatic but I'm saying that Hojlund just isn't good enough.
 
He talks a good game in the interviews but I'm really not seeing much on the pitch to believe in what he's trying to do with this team
 
Maybe, just maybe, the problem isn't the formation?
For the most part it isn't, but playing some of the players where he does is, everyone is mystified as to why Dorgu played on the right tonight when we've been crying out for a left footed LB/LWB all season
 
Says the right thing again in his post-match interview. He clearly knows the standard required.

Why wouldn't he know what standard he is expected to deliver?

It's not likely the club hired him and were vague about what they expected.