- Joined
- Oct 22, 2023
- Messages
- 533
- Supports
- Arsenal
I wonder if you guys could have used him like we did Merino?
I wonder if you guys could have used him like we did Merino?
I wonder if you guys could have used him like we did Merino?
Ofcourse goes without saying but I mean during the time he was scoring goals, could have been a good experiment.I reckon we both should have just signed a decent striker.
I genuinely don't see anything in Mount, he's good that he runs around, covers a lot of ground but don't think that's what United need as his output isn't the best (correct me if I am wrong) and its a lot of nothing. I have a feeling he is another version of Reece James - when it comes to injuries and you've been massively robbed by Chelsea. As don't think he has any real resale value either, not the amount you guys got him for anyway.I think that’s what would have happened year.
Have I genuinely just read Mason Mounts better than McTominay? I can’t remember the last time Mount had a good game, let alone contributed anything.
I think, a lot of it is down to how goals and assist dwarve other aspects of a performance. Which is right and understandable of course, but it skews perception. The question is easy, if a player isn't capable of achieving his tasks on the pitch, is this balanced out by scoring a goal or make an assist? For me personally, it isn't because the player takes away something from the team as a functional unit. That said, there is a chance, that ambition plays a vital role in that. If your team is a midtable points scrapper, then such a player probably is more important than when your ambition is getting back to the top. MotM and Whoscored ratings though aren't ideal indicators for good performances because the weighting of some aspects seems skewed. Or to be more fair and precise, at least not for what I consider good performances.I don't watch Serie A at all, and wanted to understand how much of an impact he's having. Looking at WhoScored average ratings - he's their best outfield player this season, and that's including pre-transfer Khvicha. Looks like he's got the second most goals (9 after Lukaku's 12), and second most MotM performances (4 after Anguissa's 7). Napoli are level on points with Inter for the Serie A with 5 games to go.
Do these stats reflect reality, for those who're watching some of the Napoli games? Is he as vital to the team's title run this season as the number seem to indicate?
Player CM KG Apps Mins Goals Assists Yel Red SpG PS% AerialsWon MotM Rating 1
Simone Scuffet28, GK193 77 1 90 - - - - - 76.9 1 - 7.19 2
Scott McTominay28, D(C),M(C)193 88 28(1) 2491 9 2 3 - 2.3 85 1.9 4 7.17 3
Khvicha Kvaratskhelia24, AM(CLR),FW183 76 15(2) 1191 5 3 1 - 2.9 83.3 0.3 2 7.12 4
Alessandro Buongiorno25, D(C)190 86 21 1862 1 - 2 - 0.4 91 2.1 - 7.04 5
Frank Anguissa29, M(C)184 78 27(3) 2445 6 3 5 - 1.2 85.3 1.9 7 6.99 6
Amir Rrahmani31, D(CL)192 87 33 2956 1 2 2 - 0.8 91.4 3.3 - 6.96 7
Elia Caprile23, GK191 74 3(1) 324 - - - - - 81.8 0.3 1 6.90 8
Giovanni Di Lorenzo31, D(CLR),M(R)183 83 32 2880 3 2 5 - 0.6 84.8 1.3 1 6.89 9
Romelu Lukaku31, AM(R),FW191 93 30(1) 2452 12 10 3 - 1.8 71.2 1.1 1 6.85 10
Matteo Politano31, M(CLR),FW171 67 29(3) 2423 3 2 2 - 1.5 79.7 0.2 2 6.83
Those are just not true.Everyone would have been happy for McTomminay to be kept as a squad player. He wasn’t the right person to start every week but when he played he gave solid performances. He wasn’t a defensive midfielder and he got lumbered in that role often because of poor investment.
He was moved on because we had wasted so much on Mount and Casemiro. He had much greater impact than what Mount has done so far who has essentially replaced him in the attacking mid positions.
Same goes for Elanga
It was wrong to not letting him go earlier when it was clear, he wasn't capable of playing in a top team. The revisionism is a little worrying, we've had years of him failing for us, after multiple years it still wasn't clear, what position he was the best in but a lot of examples that were able to speak against each one of them. Now they go on and have a few positive headlines while we fall down and suddenly, its been a mistake to let bad players go. It's suprising, that Fred doesn't get a mention - heard a lot of good things about him playing in Turkey.Club were wrong to let him go, his goals were important last season to United.
You buy the replacement first, let him bed in and then sell a guy like McTominay.
Really glad for him, always came across as a decent lad.
It's funny how it's the unfashionable players on here that always leave for decent fees.
Nothing but a cop out. You don't need to hate a player to be realistic of their abilities and skillset. A team like United is simply not good enough to afford a midfielder who is shit playing in midfield for the odd chance of him popping up for a goal. Such thinking is the opposite of forward thinking because it seems as if you are looking for ways to make the stuff we have to suffer through through the last two years kind of work. I mean, who wants us to continue like that only with added 8 goals from McTominay? Sure, with McTominay we might have achieved slightly better results in all the games we played as bad as we did. Still not the way forward - we have to play better. And to do that, getting rid of players who have had years of showing that they aren't capable is the right thing.Mctomminay wasn't just goals.
He allowed us an ability to play with a Maguire upfront without playing Maguire upfront.
Even if he didn't score we had that presence of Maguire in the box with Mctomminay making his runs in to the box.
We saw vs Lyon that Maguire upfront can really break down the organisation of a defensive structure. It's why Mctomminay behind a striker is very effective.
The only problem is that we played him deep and used him more for his engine than his penteration and power.
I don't think he would have fit Amorim's system, but I still like players in the first XI that fits Amorims system but players on the bench that play more differently to Amorim's system so it gives us some tactical versatility.
Whilst not so much hated, another player scapegoat targeted by fans of that nature.
Was idiotic to sell him. Still can't belive we did it. Was more then good enough to play for us then, and now, and would have been the perfect squad player if we improved as a team and start competing
I wonder if you guys could have used him like we did Merino?
Which just proves how easy it is to look good in the Seire A without actually being a good player, just look at Rasmus.If Scotty was still around Garnacho would be relegated to the bench this season. He's on course to score just as many goals as Zirzkee and Hojlund managed in Serie A and he's not even a striker.
As SJR made clear the problem is that every year we are amortizing the transfer fees of crap players that Ten Hag and Ole bought. So we have to keep selling homegrown players to generate the pure profit to fund new spending. Kovar is another one we should have kept. He's much better than Onana and Bayindir.
Are you from the future?Which just proves how easy it is to look good in the Seire A without actually being a good player. Look at Rasmus,
I'm glad we sold him. He isn't good enough for a top team in the Premier, if we ever want to get back to being one that is,.
Conte is really the perfect manager for players like McTominay and Lukaku. United should've probably tried him at some point in the last 5 years.I'd have Anguissa over him but McTominay is doing well and probably is top 3. Lukaku who can have his down moments has turned into a fantastic provider and is leading the league in assists.
It’s a thought I’ve had myself a few times. If we got him during his peak years — let him play his hyper specific playstyle (sound familiar…?), stagnate a few of the youth players and in exchange you get about 18~ months of winning football and probably a domestic title before he loses his shit with the board for not selling 23 year old Rashford and replacing him with Giaccherini or Victor Moses or something Conte style weirdConte is really the perfect manager for players like McTominay and Lukaku. United should've probably tried him at some point in the last 5 years.
Are you from the future?
The fanbase has been resistant to him after Mourinho because the board sold them on a long-term plan, which has proven to be nonsense. He plays a very specific style, but weirdly enough I think he's one of the few who could've made sense of the deformed squad they've assembled over the years.It’s a thought I’ve had myself a few times. If we got him during his peak years — let him play his hyper specific playstyle (sound familiar…?), stagnate a few of the youth players and in exchange you get about 18~ months of winning football and probably a domestic title before he loses his shit with the board for not selling 23 year old Rashford and replacing him with Giaccherini or Victor Moses or something Conte style weird
Ah come on, they still do!I've always said and stand by it. A big mistake selling him for almost nothing. One of best attacking midfielders in league. He might not be the best on the ball but problems he could cause other teams with his overall game is so underrated. If correctly used. I rate him a lot.
People have laughed at me but I guess there is some change of heart here. I'm really happy for him and I hope he wins the league.
Which just proves how easy it is to look good in the Seire A without actually being a good player, just look at Rasmus.
I'm glad we sold him. He isn't good enough for a top team in the Premier, if we ever want to get back to being one that is,.
The list of players who have failed or been average in the PL and then gone on to look much better in Italy is too long for there not to be some truth in people not rating current Serie A.You guys are silly when it comes to rating other leagues
Scuffet is a great name for a footballer.
Player CM KG Apps Mins Goals Assists Yel Red SpG PS% AerialsWon MotM Rating 1
Simone Scuffet28, GK193 77 1 90 - - - - - 76.9 1 - 7.19
The thing about hiding from the ball was not a myth though. He was not a very good player to have in central midfield in terms of both possession and shielding the back four. Good at arriving in the box to grab a goal.He is a good player with limitations and strengths who became an easy scapegoat, like Maguire, based on toxic social media trends.
"League one player" "Championship player" "Hides from the ball" "worst thing that happened to our season was McT scoring 2 against Brentford" "Fluke goal scoring season" That last one had people ignoring he had played most of his games for Utd as a DM, and you even had people scoffing at his international record despite half his games being at CB.
Just matched the Hojlund Serie A goal total that had Utd spend £70 million. Yes he has plenty of flaws but it got to the point were people refused to give him credit for the things he did well.
Yep, he's still doing it. 98% of midfielders across the top 5 leagues get the ball more than he does, which is some achievement when you're playing for one of the two best teams in a league.The thing about hiding from the ball was not a myth though. He was not a very good player to have in central midfield in terms of both possession and shielding the back four. Good at arriving in the box to grab a goal.
The thing about hiding from the ball was not a myth though. He was not a very good player to have in central midfield in terms of both possession and shielding the back four. Good at arriving in the box to grab a goal.
And the thing is, those weaknesses are not necessarily easy to link directly to a loss, whereas his strength in grabbing a goal are obviously very visible. As a result, it’s super easy to overrate him as a player.Yep, he's still doing it. 98% of midfielders across the top 5 leagues get the ball more than he does, which is some achievement when you're playing for one of the two best teams in a league.
His strengths are still a) being tall and b) nicking the odd goal. You sacrifice basically everything an actual midfielder would offer to gain those benefits.
Can't you see what that proves, though.He is a good player with limitations and strengths who became an easy scapegoat, like Maguire, based on toxic social media trends.
"League one player" "Championship player" "Hides from the ball" "worst thing that happened to our season was McT scoring 2 against Brentford" "Fluke goal scoring season" That last one had people ignoring he had played most of his games for Utd as a DM, and you even had people scoffing at his international record despite half his games being at CB.
Just matched the Hojlund Serie A goal total that had Utd spend £70 million. Yes he has plenty of flaws but it got to the point were people refused to give him credit for the things he did well.
Can't you see what that proves, though.
Not really. Athletic level is lower in the Seria ANot too surprised he is getting some goals, but the surprising one is how many duels he is winning. He is better off in Serie A.
I remember his contributions, not his passing stats. We all knew he isn't Paul Schnoles. And you mentioning Mount as of know being a better footballer is cringeworthy. Based on what can someone who actually has seen Mount claim that?
He has only shown that he can foul in a United shirt. And I am being generous.
I don’t give a rats ass about his passing stats. His career best league goals pretty much balance it out you are pretty spot on.Well then go look up his passing stats and remind yourself. Then ask yourself does his career best 7 league goals(for us) balance it out.
I don’t give a rats ass about his passing stats. His career best league goals pretty much balance it out you are pretty spot on.
Please remind me who’s passing stats are you enjoying the most during and after McT departure. Do they balance it out?
Ah, you watch football with your eyes closed until a goal goes in. Fair enough, I can see why you'd be a McTominay fan.I don’t give a rats ass about his passing stats. His career best league goals pretty much balance it out you are pretty spot on.
Please remind me who’s passing stats are you enjoying the most during and after McT departure. Do they balance it out?