Recent content by #88

Yes, but they used Twitter as the vehicle to quell the notion with regards to the age tweet. It worked to some extent. And with the 'Classed as Risk Group / Not Running for Palace or Gala' - this could have been nipped in the bud through he same Twitter(x) vehicle, to their 18k followers (and...

:D Good post.

There is a market for everything these days it seems. A pint with Farage only costs you £3.60 in Spoons if you are into your racism.

TRA were quick to expand on and explain the situation when they inadvertently led some of the elder United fans to the conclusion that they wanted older fans to be moved on, and replaced by younger ones. That blew up online and lead to quick and succinct messages of clarification from TRA. - It...

At least you got sorted pal.

I know what you are eluding to. TRA had a click bait headline, that some dope read as gospel, while not clicking to get the full SP. This manifested into something bigger, that suited the agenda of TRA and their 1958 counterparts. Neither clarified that situation and let it roll. United came and...

Who am I to blame anyone? And why would anyone care what I think. The Headline was put out for attention, it went viral on the Red Channels with the Club getting involved and releasing a statement. Do you accept that the Club had to outline their position as they too thought there was...

BOTS ?

You could bet your bottom dollar that they would have refuted any mass social media claims if they were negative. What happened was: Ambiguous statement, grew legs as anticipated. Club interjected.

TRA Statement Headline, which was widely shared 'TRA classed as 'risk group' not running for Palace or Galatasaray' was put out for a self serving purpose. It misrepresents the situation. So much so, that Manchester United needed to make another statement this week, contextualizing the situation.

I don't think they will put out a statement saying 'we refused to take up our allocation for the League Cup and CL Game', when the narrative has been TRA have been refused their section / banned and are a risk. Big Bad United/Glazers. The latter narrative for TRA and 1958 suits much better. And...

Via their member channels. The don't want away from SERS, they want a second part of the stadium closer to the Away Fans. They had this on Trial last Season if you remember. But the carpet has been pulled from under them more use of A-Stand. This is because, the Police classed them as a 'Risk...

It has been clarified by TRA. They refused to take the section in SERS, They were due to have A Stand for Palace and 1st Home CL Game but the Club wouldn't facilitate.

Without wanting to discredit the Groups TRA and 1958 in their entirety (they do contribute positively), there is an element of that are in the toilets before games getting their kicks and more that are on the beer. Its been widely published that the sit-in was going to take place, and no doubt...

They have hit the washing lines and the bed sheets, taking advantage of the warm days and in-expectant homemakers. As yet, they haven't done anything that the LUHG movements of a decade past didn't try. Interesting to see what today's news is.