Recent content by dedek_mraz

true.. he's Van Hecke of a player ..

His allround play is better than Hojlunds especialy passing and bringing others into play. If we could have them both I think they would supplement each other nicely, by which I mean that we could alternate between the two depending on the gameplan (counter-attacking approach - Hojlund and when...

much better deal and a fair price for a prospect, but sadly I doubt we'll be interested in Šeško now.. there was a rumor few weeks back that we were exploring a loan for Šeško this january till end of the season but I doubt it was based on anything real, just lazy journalism cause we showed...

Hope the 9:0 moaners can live with todays result

I wish the posters who wish us to lose this just because it suits their anti ETH or moaning agenda would have a good hard look at themselves. You can want changes in the club management/long term running of the club, but NEVER at the cost of losing to your arch rival.

yeah, but as you say he could've been available for lets say 50m which is still alot less than Hojlund and Sesko if by far a better prospect.

Would have been a good shout if only he didnt proclaim himself a massive 'pool fan just the other day.. which would indicate they're working on a deal in the background.. or he's just a bit weird:houllier::lol: Sesko + recogniser striker would be my pick over Rasmus, but if there is a option of...

hope he wont be too stuborn and will change it up if this new formation and gameplan doesnt work..

442 and where are Bruno, Rash, Garnacho and Antony gonna play?! .. we should've just bought Ferguson instead of Hojlund.

Toney, J. David for example .. and yes even Moukoko or E. Ferguson (to share the load with Rasmus)

we should really be buying a recognised starting striker and Hojlund should be the back up, Martial when fit a bonus. People who expect Hojlund to score anything more than 10 goals are going to be dissapointed. Rasmus is a 1 in 3 striker so if he lets say plays around 30 games I think 10 is...

We scored 58 PL goals last season. City bagged 94 goals and even if we discount them Arsenal had 88. Thats still 30 goals more and I think we all agree that for a title challenge we will need to up the ante on that front let say at least 20 goals more. The club put all the eggs in the Rasmus...

I guess time will show but right now I disagreee, he is a marginal improvement over Wout as he's quicker and has better movement, but being better than Wout is a really low bar. I dont think Rasmus improves United in terms of a possible title challenge. exactly! He is a good prospect but...

his movement is good but finishing and composure are not on the required level of United's no1 striker. I hope he can get some quick poacher's goals right from the start to build confidence and in the meantime work hard on his finishing with Benni. But people on here are seriuosly overestimating...

That's not a good look and what worries me the most about him. His decision making is severely lacking (he's dreadful with 1 on 1 with the keeper and he often runs into blind alleys when dribling). Hope I'm wrong 'cause he seems a great character and I respect his courage and determination, but...