Recent content by Fanatic 00237

I think it’s disingenuous to say this, it's fairly reasonable that those who are interested in discussing his performance will be more inclined to do so when he performs well. He doesn’t play for us, so like practically every other thread following players on loan, people would be way more...

Big thanks to Solanke. Initially went for United but then tried to be smart and changed late to Bournemouth. Serves me right.

:lol: :lol: You actually have me laughing out loud here. Nice, thanks for the offer Damien, that's very kind of you. Now, I hope I do make it beyond four weeks :lol:

MD 27, bonus card for Ødegaard please.

I have never gone beyond five rounds in the easy mode we always have on the Caf, what could go wrong in attempting the hard mode? Well, I'm in, joined there with username Fanatic (maybe if I somehow manage to win the game, I can finally have the numbers dropped from my username on here as well :D).

And I don’t disagree with that one bit. I’ve been taken away from my initial point by posters repeatedly misrepresenting my comments. Actually, I brought Ronaldo up in a discussion (with Wibble, I think?), where I was trying to argue that it’s very unfair (to say the least) to accuse anyone who...

Yeah, I recall I said that out of annoyance at your hypothesising about my reasons for discussing Ronaldo. I really didn’t mean to call you out for anything whatsoever. Fair enough, mate, you're free not to accept my reasons. However, Ronaldo can’t talk of redemption when his victim seems to...

Please, show me where I yelled hypocrite at anyone, apart from using it ironically back against the very poster who accused me first of trying to yell hypocrite (I can't remember if it was you?) I haven't been vague at all on the topic. I thought the post in this thread where I first mentioned...

I find this whole situation really very sad and I'm deeply wishing for a happy end to the story for him and his partner and their family. If it happens to be at United I'd be okay with that but if it's anywhere else, it's fine. I would be defending the same position if it was McTominay or...

And yet, I choose to discuss the parallel between Ronaldo and Greenwood in this thread because in my opinion both cases are very related. Feel free to report me for taking the thread off topic and let the mods decide or just don't respond to those posts, it's that simple really.

I agree with this, it is the most sensible and decent thing to do when you've been found out, although I do wonder whether he was legally advised not to do that as it would mean publicly confessing a crime?

Yes, I brought it up initially and I have been discussing it with other posters who didn't mind me bringing it up, if you don't think it's relevant, then you need not respond, you can't expect people on a forum to discuss topics only in a certain direction which pleases you. It's quite obvious...

Sorry, I'm not sure what triggered you there but if you follow the quoted message you would realise that I was responding to a particular post? It's all part of the bigger discussion, if you're not interested then you mustn't respond. I have discussed Greenwood at length already and I also think...

My goodness, it's really exhausting to respond to someone (deliberately?) misrepresenting your words. Why would you think I'm only now taking a contradictory stance on Ronaldo to prove a point? I'll give you the benefit of doubt and spell it out clearly: I had that stance on Ronaldo when we...

If I follow your drift, that means you consider all Ronaldo fans (and fanboys) to be despicable people? Personally, I'm absolutely not one, but I find that position a little bit extreme, to be honest.