Big time bottler? He scored the biggest goal of their history in the dying seconds to win his team the league. He would score against United, Liverpool and Chelsea fairly often. Even if he wasn’t scoring he was still capable of contributing...
He’s a right dirty player. Not surprised he needed a penalty to get in the scoresheet too since he generally doesn’t do open play goals in big football matches.
But it’s not though is it? Pragmatic managers have won silverware for smaller clubs than Spurs. If they ever want to rid themselves of that thing of being ridiculed for winning nothing then they might want to think about a bit more of a pragmatic...
I still can’t fathom why people blow smoke up the guys arse. There’s a reason his Celtic sides were embarrassed in Europe and it’s because of that stubborn attitude to always going all out attack. It’s fine if you have a far stronger squad than...
Why? You’re implying the finally won the CL because they had him. But they were in another CL final a couple of years prior too. So given that Haaland wasn’t the difference maker in the final (or even the semi’s) then why would it be acceptable...
I always said De Bruyne should have been the one in the final 3 last time. Haaland’s tally is unreal, you can’t take away from him how impressive it is. But guys like De Bruyne performed better, did better in the bigger games, and they’re just...
He’s useless in games like that. Actually really surprised PG took Alvarez off and left him on. Alvarez will do a bit of running, look for the ball and take players on. Haaland was a man down strolling about just waiting for a break.