Recent content by mdn1987

Maybe go down the route of cricket, and give each team one/two review(s) per game (for any “big” decision ie offside goals, penalty calls, red card disputes etc)? The captain has so many seconds to challenge the ref’s decision and, if they win, they keep their review. If not, they lose it. Not...

Bruno Fernandes Julian Weigl Gary Speed Gylfi Sigurdsson Joao Moutinho Morten Gamst Pedersen Carlos Bacca Peter Whittingham Bernard

Either way, we need to be playing for 4th place minimum - just to make certain we qualify for the Champions League. I don't want to be relying on European bans etc... We shouldn't take anything for granted, but we have a fantastic opportunity here. We certainly have the ability, and as...

No, we wouldn't. Our last game is against Leicester. Beat them, and assuming they win all their other games, we'd still finish two points above them.

Mourinho's home record in all competitions this season: Won 16, drawn 11, and lost 1. Not a single team from outside of Manchester has won at Old Trafford this season. Turn those draws into wins (in the league) next season, and we'll do a lot better.

When you put it like that, I guess it would be quite difficult to implement. It could probably work for goals that are flagged offside, but actually aren't. If proven, the decision gets reversed and the goal stands. Obviously, just appealing an offside decision when a goal hasn't been scored...

What about a '3 challenge' rule, a little bit like in tennis? If a team feels a huge call has been made incorrectly, the captain could challenge the ref to review the decision (be it through video). Obviously retain goal line technology, as that automatically informs the referee if the ball has...

"Football. Bloody Hell."