Recent content by terraloo

I heard a pundit trying to defend the non penalty given for us, Chelsea, and had to smile . The view was that the VAR didn’t think that Oliver made a clear an obvious mistake. On the basis that Oliver didn’t see any contact from Grealish and gave the goal kick then clearly it was a clear and...

They are but my point was that replays don’t always lead to the pot of gold that some believe. It would have been far more sense to do away with replays in the 6 yes 6 qualifying rounds prior to the first round proper where other than home advantage in the vast bulk of replays there is no...

Its easy to focus on a small club v a big club when it comes to an FA Cup replay but the simple fact is that certainly in the qualifying rounds clubs actually make a loss playing in the FA Cup. That is once travel costs , stewards , overnight if applicable (costs which would double if there is a...

Sorry this is just nonsense Since day 1 individuals have injected money into football . The Moore’s at both Liverpool and Everton or what about John Hall at Newcastle or Jack Walker at Blackburn for instance The irony when it comes to RA he didn’t just write off loans he very much lent money...

Inter company activities have been taking place since aAdam was a boy. There is absolutely nothing unique nor illegal as long as it’s accounted for correctly and any tax liability dealt with. Yes Arsenal sold most the properties to the general public but it comes back to the basic point that...

That stat was mentioned last night on sky. Still far too much inconsistency but now within striking distance of a place next season in UEFA tournament next season.

Bit like when Arsenals holding company paid off interest bearing debts and loaded the debt at reduced cost on the club

So remind me of the property sales that Arsenal included and still do in their accounts should they have been discounted?

If Scott it was a one year deal ( which he obviously isnt ) then AFC would have loaded £25 million onto their charge to amortisation. From a PSR perspective that would be crazy It goes to prove the point as to it’s best to rely on information from official sources such as the club itself...

This response alone proves how little you know about discipline matters in football and in particular the Premier League Rosens role will be absolutely nothing to do with obtaining evidence or even reviewing his role is to appoint the panel to the commission. Discovery would be incredibly...

You clearly haven’t grasped the simple fact that at this point in time Chelsea have not been charged with anything that’s not to say they won’t but you have fallen hook line and sinker into believing everything you read in the press.Again you haven’t grasped the fact that the dominant English...

I don’t dispute that most of what you have quoted has appeared in the press but you fall into a massive trap in that you have only seen what the likes of the Guardian have said and even then they do not dare state the “ evidence “ is proof positive and the use of the word could by them is...

Don't you think that the reason that Chelsea haven’t been charged is simply because it’s not quite as straight forward as you seem to think? The current ownership reported what they believed to be incomplete information. The same information has been submitted to the 3 Regulatory bodies...

Wont happen for a variety of reasons such as 1) The FA cup isn’t a PL run competition . 2) There isn’t any cost ratio or FFP in the FA Rule Book

Re charges for exceeding the PSR limit up to the end of the 22/23 accounting cycle then no other club is getting charged. Ironically the Everton case still hasn’t been fully settled the PL believe the clubs PSR submissions/ deduction for the last three year cycle is incorrect . So still...