Recent content by ubergorp

no we didn't :lol:, i just responded to a hate thread about us. nice to see you still think about me xo

above 18 and enjoyed muppeting on reddevils so much that I wanted to create a space to keep it going when ITKs were outlawed if I craved an audience, don't you think I'd have been on the podcast? weirdly, I think we get more intense attention from you lot than any of our users

Red Cafe when we get stuff wrong: Morons! Idiots! Scam artists! Red Cafe when we get stuff right: Why didn't you say it sooner! Embarrassing! I can't believe you have the audacity to get a thing right when you previously got a thing wrong!

VDB has been mentioned quite a few times for what it's worth Also, here's a timestamp for ya

GW1 - Arsenal GW2 - Everton GW3 - Leeds

This is an incredibly valid comment, thank you. To be fair, the whole platform was built on a ‘don’t shoot the messenger’ approach. Repeated disclaimers to take the info with a pinch of salt, reminders that whilst we try to vet stuff we can make mistakes, and changing the whole system to imply...

Why was it well worth it? Were you trying (and failing, I might add) to hurt my feelings? Were you making an intentionally inflammatory, rude, or upsetting statement in order to elicit a strong emotional response in me? “I am proud of myself for insulting someone on the internet and I am wearing...

I don't know if they're lies, all I'm saying is we haven't lied. We are only saying 'ITK X has told us Y', which is entirely truthful. If Y is not true, that does not make us liars.

Sorry I just keep coming back to this. It’s so good. I want it on my tombstone. “Ubergorbage” is brilliant, how do you come up with this stuff? I never pretended it was mathematically sound, the other member did. I was simply using the framing they provided. Yeah that is bad, I agree. It's why...

The transfer confidence rating is a personal confidence. It’s not pretending to be the result of a complex algorithm, so stop pretending it is. All I’m saying is if you’re going to criticise us for being bad at maths, you better damn make sure your own maths are sound. “look at this idiot, he...

That’s incredibly uncalled for. All I did was point out that the person who called us out for not understanding mathematics does not understand mathematics themselves. Why be so mean?

Call it lecturing if you will, all I’m saying is that in an ‘inclusive or’ scenario, two 50%’s do not equal 50%. The irony of you lot having a go at me for spreading misinformation whilst simultaneously having a go at me for correcting basic maths :lol::lol::lol:

Let's do some maths shall we? p(G) = probability of Grealish joining = 50% p(D) = probability of Donny joining = 50% p(G and D) = probability of BOTH joining = p(G) * p(D) = 0.5 * 0.5 = 0.25 or 25% p(G or D) = probability of EITHER joining = p(G) + p(D) - p(G and D) = 0.5 + 0.5 - 0.25 = 0.75...

If you can convince me these comments were made by people who were in the subreddit to actually participate rather than to kick up dust, I will hand over the keys to the subreddit to you oh wise one. I don't doubt some comments were removed a little harshly, especially when we've had so many...

Basically every ITK has lay their chips on the table, and said 'Sancho is coming, end of. Don't know what the hold up is but everything is agreed in principle.' Once you make a statement like that there's not much to add until there's some movement