Premier League Gameweek 28-29

Mullet_Man

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 16, 2011
Messages
486
When it's slowed down it looks like it comes off Mac Allister's chest before Dokus boot to me?!
 

Rojofiam

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
3,444
The timing, the ramifications and the fact that Oliver was literally paid by City’s owners means there’s no way that’s getting given.
It's so unbelievable and horrible that there's such an obvious conflict of interest in the best league in the world, and nothing is being done about it
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,228
Carra doesn't think it's a pen to be fair.

Though, imagine if that was for us and Nev said it wasn't a penalty. His thread would be going mental :lol:
If we'd not go that pen late on, the whole thread would have been losing their biscuit.
 

CoopersDream

Full Member
Joined
May 30, 2021
Messages
499
I also think it is a big difference to the situation with Ederson last week - Ederson made clean contact with the ball and the ball was cleared from the situation. Here Doku barely touches the ball and the ball is still very close to the situation which sort of nullifies the 'he got to the ball first'.
 

chomsky89

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
161
Location
Budapest
Clearly a penalty. Can't go around kicking people in the chest.
It might have been, but It's not automatically a foul when you rush into a falling ball trying to chest it(or kick it) and make contact with the opponent, because there is also something in the rulebook called unavoidable contact, meant to deal with those situations where two people are looking at the ball and going for it at the same time, no matter which part of your body you are using. VAR ruled it off based on this rule, wrong or not.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,168
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
So if my opponent kick the ball and I throw myself into his foot it is penalty?

Never a penalty.
No, it wouldn’t be, but I’m not sure what your hypothetical has got to do with this incident?

He DIDN’T throw himself into Doku’s foot and Doku DID kick him in the chest. In football, that’s called dangerous play and in the penalty area, that is a penalty every day of the week and twice on Sundays (ironic? :)).

I don‘t know anyone who wants Liverpool to lose week, in, week out, more than I do… I’d love to see them relegated. But that’s still a pen.
 

RedRocket9908

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2023
Messages
2,377
Location
Manchester
It might have been, but It's not automatically a foul when you rush into a falling ball trying to chest it(or kick it) and make contact with the opponent, because there is also something in the rulebook called unavoidable contact, meant to deal with those situations where two people are looking at the ball and going for it at the same time, no matter which part of your body you are using. VAR ruled it off based on this rule, wrong or not.
It was given as a penalty when Scott McTominay did that in the home game against FC Copenhagen
 

chomsky89

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
161
Location
Budapest
He DIDN’T throw himself into Doku’s foot and Doku DID kick him in the chest. In football, that’s called dangerous play and in the penalty area, that is a penalty every day of the week
It's more complicated than that under current rules. If two people are looking at a falling ball and going at it, it might fall under "unavoidable contact" no matter what body parts you are using, which was the conclusion in the VAR room, wrong or not.
 

Cheech Wizard

Liverpool fan
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Messages
6,807
Location
Lé Fylde Coast
Supports
Liverpool
We deserved to win but it’s not all bad considering. I would have more pissed off if we had played like that all in second half with the chances missed had MacAllister missed his penalty. That would really have sucked.

I think the international break has come at a good time for City before they next okay Arsenal, might just help them recoup and hold off Arsenal momentum when they visit. A draw between them or City win, and a win for us in next game puts us back on top.
 

CoopersDream

Full Member
Joined
May 30, 2021
Messages
499
It was given as a penalty when Scott McTominay did that in the home game against FC Copenhagen
No point in comparing decisions in Europe with the PL as they clearly interprets rules differently. But as far as I remember Scott didn't touch the ball which certainly makes some difference.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,168
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
Went for the ball, got the ball. Wasn't exactly his face that he kicked was it? What did you expect Doku to do? Not go for the ball? Yes MacAllister got a boot to the chest, but welcome to football, a contact sport. It would have been incredibly soft if it was given, and no way a contest like that should have been decided by it, so never in a million years would it have been given.
Ahhh, sorry I missed that Doku didn’t stud him in the face… that makes all the difference.

No foul then…
 

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,273
No, it wouldn’t be, but I’m not sure what your hypothetical has got to do with this incident?

He DIDN’T throw himself into Doku’s foot and Doku DID kick him in the chest. In football, that’s called dangerous play and in the penalty area, that is a penalty every day of the week and twice on Sundays (ironic? :)).

I don‘t know anyone who wants Liverpool to lose week, in, week out, more than I do… I’d love to see them relegated. But that’s still a pen.
I don’t agree with you. Doku kicked the ball. MacAllister went into Dokus foot with his chest. It is not like MacAllister headed the ball and Doku karate kicked him. For me this is not penalty.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,168
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
It's more complicated than that under current rules. If two people are looking at a falling ball and going at it, it might fall under "unavoidable contact" no matter what body parts you are using, which was the conclusion in the VAR room, wrong or not.
It’s not complicated, and it’s not unavoidable… it’s wrong.
 

DJ_21

Evens winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
12,252
Location
Manchester
But this isn't penalty. MacAllister went into him with his chest when Doku cleared the ball. You can't expect getting decisions by throwing yourself into other people.
How on earth does someone go into someone with the chest :lol: And if his foot’s that high to reach his chest then that’s normally a foul.
 

CloneMC16

Full Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2021
Messages
4,500
And yet...he didn't. Studs were pointing down and there was no contact whatsoever with the guy's chest, only with his thigh on the way down. Embarrassing that people would prefer to watch a guy rolling around for 2 mins holding a part of his body that wasn't touched than let a daft decision from a winger in defence go unpunished.

If the ref had given it there's no way VAR would have overturned it and it was fecking stupid from Doku, but no pen was 100% the right decision.
Studs were pointed down and no contact?


If that isn't a foul, I have no idea what the rules are any more.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,228
No, it wouldn’t be, but I’m not sure what your hypothetical has got to do with this incident?

He DIDN’T throw himself into Doku’s foot and Doku DID kick him in the chest. In football, that’s called dangerous play and in the penalty area, that is a penalty every day of the week and twice on Sundays (ironic? :)).

I don‘t know anyone who wants Liverpool to lose week, in, week out, more than I do… I’d love to see them relegated. But that’s still a pen.
Are you factoring in Doku getting a skim on the ball so fine that only a HD tv would show it though?
 

Bearded One

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2017
Messages
1,245
Are you factoring in Doku getting a skim on the ball so fine that only a HD tv would show it though?
Fine margins here and I think doku is lucky here particularly because there is a slight touch on the ball by him rather than Mc Allister. If he didn’t touch the ball it would be a totally different issue.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,168
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
Are you factoring in Doku getting a skim on the ball so fine that only a HD tv would show it though?
I caught that but on balance, I thought the studs being 4 foot off the ground and hitting him in the chest outweighed it. Call me a traditionalist.

To be honest, once one poster started with “he went for the ball”, I gave up. Wanted a draw, more chance of Arsenal (the third worst option of three awful options) winning the league
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,228
I caught that but on balance, I thought the studs being 4 foot off the ground and hitting him in the chest outweighed it. Call me a traditionalist.

To be honest, once one poster started with “he went for the ball”, I gave up. Wanted a draw, more chance of Arsenal (the third worst option of three awful options) winning the league
Just remember he slightly skimmed the ball, and ignore the not even looking around him and recklessly waving his stud 5 foot in the air, and it's all good.

Imagine how horrible it'd have been if they'd won that late on. We'd all still be fuming now, hours later.
 

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,273
How on earth does someone go into someone with the chest :lol: And if his foot’s that high to reach his chest then that’s normally a foul.
It isn’t that difficult. Or do you think Phil Jones should be getting freekicks / penalties every time he went diving head first? Throwing himself towards ball where players wouldn’t even put their feet.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,228
Shouldn't be a foul. Not a foul. Nani shouldn't have been sent off.
You're conflating two different things here.
No, Nani shouldn't have been sent off, but even the most deluded United fan wouldn't say that wasn't a foul!
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,228
How on earth does someone go into someone with the chest :lol: And if his foot’s that high to reach his chest then that’s normally a foul.
It's the sort of idiocy that people say in jest isn't it.

Leg went into their studs, after a 2 footer etc.
 

DJ_21

Evens winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
12,252
Location
Manchester
It isn’t that difficult. Or do you think Phil Jones should be getting freekicks / penalties every time he went diving head first? Throwing himself towards ball where players wouldn’t even put their feet.
That guys on a different planet though. He’d try and head a ball that was on the floor so that shouldn’t be a foul. If someone’s got there feet up to your chest when your trying to chest a ball and he catches you then it’s a foul. End of story really
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,477
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
You're conflating two different things here.
No, Nani shouldn't have been sent off, but even the most deluded United fan wouldn't say that wasn't a foul!
Oh, right you are

But I still don't know... If you run 20 yards to throw your chest into someone's studs I think it should be game on :D

This one was more of a foul, although everything about this remains funny (Vidic's approval, Lampard ignoring Drogba, the yellow card)

 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,435
How is anyone saying that isn’t a penalty? He didn’t get the ball and studded him in the chest, I don’t see the point in VAR if it is t overturning that. I wanted City to win as well but that’s a penalty
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,228
Oh, right you are

But I still don't know... If you run 20 yards to throw your chest into someone's studs I think it should be game on :D

This one was more of a foul, although everything about this remains funny (Vidic's approval, Lampard ignoring Drogba, the yellow card)

Very bizarre scenario.
Evans going to ground made it look like he'd been fouled, especially with Drogba sprinting in.

Drogba also had a massive rep for cheating and going down very very easily, which for a 15stone absolute behemoth of power was ludicrous.
 

GregM40

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
587
Location
Manchester
Caught the second half of the Liverpool game in the pub. Quite a few United in cheering them on, weird. Exhilarating half of footy though, can’t say we’ve seen that this season. Stonewall pen turned down at the end too, and all the shots of the woodwork, hilarious.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,168
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
Just remember he slightly skimmed the ball, and ignore the not even looking around him and recklessly waving his stud 5 foot in the air, and it's all good.

Imagine how horrible it'd have been if they'd won that late on. We'd all still be fuming now, hours later.
As it is, I can message my work mate (Liverpool fan) several times and saying “never a penalty in a million years”?

I see it less as hypocrisy and more as ‘banter’. He seems very worked up by it :cool:
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,228
As it is, I can message my work mate (Liverpool fan) several times and saying “never a penalty in a million years”?

I see it less as hypocrisy and more as ‘banter’. He seems very worked up by it :cool:
Liverpool fans who genuinely believe they are hard done by are the worst.
 

NICanRed

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 3, 2018
Messages
266
A little surprised Mac Allister wasn't penalised for injuring Doku's foot!