- Joined
- Jun 16, 2011
- Messages
- 486
When it's slowed down it looks like it comes off Mac Allister's chest before Dokus boot to me?!
It's so unbelievable and horrible that there's such an obvious conflict of interest in the best league in the world, and nothing is being done about itThe timing, the ramifications and the fact that Oliver was literally paid by City’s owners means there’s no way that’s getting given.
If we'd not go that pen late on, the whole thread would have been losing their biscuit.Carra doesn't think it's a pen to be fair.
Though, imagine if that was for us and Nev said it wasn't a penalty. His thread would be going mental
Someone loves Klopp and hates themselves for it.Only Liverpool fans can like Klopp, what a horrible, cringy, moany, hypocritical clown of a human. I will not miss him one fecking bit here. Good riddance.
Obviously.If that was a penalty, VAR would obviously have given it.
Do you mean like Martin “NBA” Odegaard?I'm obviously happy Liverpool didn't get the pen, but what was that?
It must the worst referee decision I've seen for a long long time, if that's not a penalty than running with the ball in your hands in your own box clearly isn't.
It might have been, but It's not automatically a foul when you rush into a falling ball trying to chest it(or kick it) and make contact with the opponent, because there is also something in the rulebook called unavoidable contact, meant to deal with those situations where two people are looking at the ball and going for it at the same time, no matter which part of your body you are using. VAR ruled it off based on this rule, wrong or not.Clearly a penalty. Can't go around kicking people in the chest.
To be fair, you got one borderline penalty earlier in the game. Can’t get them every time.Obviously.
Like the goal against Spurs.
Like the basketball handball from Odegard.
LiVARpool.
No, it wouldn’t be, but I’m not sure what your hypothetical has got to do with this incident?So if my opponent kick the ball and I throw myself into his foot it is penalty?
Never a penalty.
I mean that one genuinely was a stonewall penalty. Nothing borderline about it.To be fair, you got one borderline penalty earlier in the game. Can’t get them every time.
Hardly touched him, and Nunez was going nowhere.I mean that one genuinely was a stonewall penalty. Nothing borderline about it.
It was given as a penalty when Scott McTominay did that in the home game against FC CopenhagenIt might have been, but It's not automatically a foul when you rush into a falling ball trying to chest it(or kick it) and make contact with the opponent, because there is also something in the rulebook called unavoidable contact, meant to deal with those situations where two people are looking at the ball and going for it at the same time, no matter which part of your body you are using. VAR ruled it off based on this rule, wrong or not.
It's more complicated than that under current rules. If two people are looking at a falling ball and going at it, it might fall under "unavoidable contact" no matter what body parts you are using, which was the conclusion in the VAR room, wrong or not.He DIDN’T throw himself into Doku’s foot and Doku DID kick him in the chest. In football, that’s called dangerous play and in the penalty area, that is a penalty every day of the week
You'd be happy with playon if that happened in midfield?It wasn't a foul
No point in comparing decisions in Europe with the PL as they clearly interprets rules differently. But as far as I remember Scott didn't touch the ball which certainly makes some difference.It was given as a penalty when Scott McTominay did that in the home game against FC Copenhagen
Ahhh, sorry I missed that Doku didn’t stud him in the face… that makes all the difference.Went for the ball, got the ball. Wasn't exactly his face that he kicked was it? What did you expect Doku to do? Not go for the ball? Yes MacAllister got a boot to the chest, but welcome to football, a contact sport. It would have been incredibly soft if it was given, and no way a contest like that should have been decided by it, so never in a million years would it have been given.
I don’t agree with you. Doku kicked the ball. MacAllister went into Dokus foot with his chest. It is not like MacAllister headed the ball and Doku karate kicked him. For me this is not penalty.No, it wouldn’t be, but I’m not sure what your hypothetical has got to do with this incident?
He DIDN’T throw himself into Doku’s foot and Doku DID kick him in the chest. In football, that’s called dangerous play and in the penalty area, that is a penalty every day of the week and twice on Sundays (ironic? ).
I don‘t know anyone who wants Liverpool to lose week, in, week out, more than I do… I’d love to see them relegated. But that’s still a pen.
It’s not complicated, and it’s not unavoidable… it’s wrong.It's more complicated than that under current rules. If two people are looking at a falling ball and going at it, it might fall under "unavoidable contact" no matter what body parts you are using, which was the conclusion in the VAR room, wrong or not.
How on earth does someone go into someone with the chest And if his foot’s that high to reach his chest then that’s normally a foul.But this isn't penalty. MacAllister went into him with his chest when Doku cleared the ball. You can't expect getting decisions by throwing yourself into other people.
Studs were pointed down and no contact?And yet...he didn't. Studs were pointing down and there was no contact whatsoever with the guy's chest, only with his thigh on the way down. Embarrassing that people would prefer to watch a guy rolling around for 2 mins holding a part of his body that wasn't touched than let a daft decision from a winger in defence go unpunished.
If the ref had given it there's no way VAR would have overturned it and it was fecking stupid from Doku, but no pen was 100% the right decision.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
McT made much less contact if anythingIt was given as a penalty when Scott McTominay did that in the home game against FC Copenhagen
Are you factoring in Doku getting a skim on the ball so fine that only a HD tv would show it though?No, it wouldn’t be, but I’m not sure what your hypothetical has got to do with this incident?
He DIDN’T throw himself into Doku’s foot and Doku DID kick him in the chest. In football, that’s called dangerous play and in the penalty area, that is a penalty every day of the week and twice on Sundays (ironic? ).
I don‘t know anyone who wants Liverpool to lose week, in, week out, more than I do… I’d love to see them relegated. But that’s still a pen.
Fine margins here and I think doku is lucky here particularly because there is a slight touch on the ball by him rather than Mc Allister. If he didn’t touch the ball it would be a totally different issue.Are you factoring in Doku getting a skim on the ball so fine that only a HD tv would show it though?
I caught that but on balance, I thought the studs being 4 foot off the ground and hitting him in the chest outweighed it. Call me a traditionalist.Are you factoring in Doku getting a skim on the ball so fine that only a HD tv would show it though?
Just remember he slightly skimmed the ball, and ignore the not even looking around him and recklessly waving his stud 5 foot in the air, and it's all good.I caught that but on balance, I thought the studs being 4 foot off the ground and hitting him in the chest outweighed it. Call me a traditionalist.
To be honest, once one poster started with “he went for the ball”, I gave up. Wanted a draw, more chance of Arsenal (the third worst option of three awful options) winning the league
It isn’t that difficult. Or do you think Phil Jones should be getting freekicks / penalties every time he went diving head first? Throwing himself towards ball where players wouldn’t even put their feet.How on earth does someone go into someone with the chest And if his foot’s that high to reach his chest then that’s normally a foul.
You're conflating two different things here.Shouldn't be a foul. Not a foul. Nani shouldn't have been sent off.
It's the sort of idiocy that people say in jest isn't it.How on earth does someone go into someone with the chest And if his foot’s that high to reach his chest then that’s normally a foul.
That guys on a different planet though. He’d try and head a ball that was on the floor so that shouldn’t be a foul. If someone’s got there feet up to your chest when your trying to chest a ball and he catches you then it’s a foul. End of story reallyIt isn’t that difficult. Or do you think Phil Jones should be getting freekicks / penalties every time he went diving head first? Throwing himself towards ball where players wouldn’t even put their feet.
Oh, right you areYou're conflating two different things here.
No, Nani shouldn't have been sent off, but even the most deluded United fan wouldn't say that wasn't a foul!
Very bizarre scenario.Oh, right you are
But I still don't know... If you run 20 yards to throw your chest into someone's studs I think it should be game on
This one was more of a foul, although everything about this remains funny (Vidic's approval, Lampard ignoring Drogba, the yellow card)
As it is, I can message my work mate (Liverpool fan) several times and saying “never a penalty in a million years”?Just remember he slightly skimmed the ball, and ignore the not even looking around him and recklessly waving his stud 5 foot in the air, and it's all good.
Imagine how horrible it'd have been if they'd won that late on. We'd all still be fuming now, hours later.
Liverpool fans who genuinely believe they are hard done by are the worst.As it is, I can message my work mate (Liverpool fan) several times and saying “never a penalty in a million years”?
I see it less as hypocrisy and more as ‘banter’. He seems very worked up by it