VAR and Refs | General Discussion | Forest go into meltdown

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,949
Location
W.Yorks
He was a terrible ref for both sides.

He literally gave us a goal kick for the clearest deflection you're likely to see.
 

NicolaSacco

Full Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2016
Messages
2,329
Supports
Ipswich
The referee made three very suspect decisions. The Dalot free kick for having his shirt pulled. AWB for winning the ball. Maguire for existing at a corner.

You can't rule out match fixing / fixed betting when you see decisions that unusual.
And you’re certain that the problem here is not your perception?! Every fan in the world can name multiple bad decisions given against their own team. Who is it that they’re all wrong and you’re right?!
 

2 man midfield

Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
46,056
Location
?
The ref wasn’t that bad today imo. Couple of weird decisions but nothing massive.
 

Bubz27

No I won’t change your tag line
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
21,581
Because we got our point thanks to a very soft penalty, the kind that hasn’t been given all season in the Premier League.
The lad moves his arm out towards the ball. That's always a penalty. He didn't even complain that much himself.
 

Golden Nugget

Full Member
Joined
May 7, 2011
Messages
2,236
The referee made three very suspect decisions. The Dalot free kick for having his shirt pulled. AWB for winning the ball. Maguire for existing at a corner.

You can't rule out match fixing / fixed betting when you see decisions that unusual.
Really? Finally saw a ref give us a penalty today; book a player for diving against us and a penalty ruled by VAR.

The ref made some very confusing calls but it was really didn’t feel like any bias towards us today, just a poor ref that really looked lost and overwhelmed
 

Jev

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
8,053
Location
Denmark
The lad moves his arm out towards the ball. That's always a penalty. He didn't even complain that much himself.
To me it looks like the movement is him trying to actually move his arm away from the ball. Surely we can agree it wasn’t a stonewaller?
 

Garnacho's Shoelaces

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 6, 2022
Messages
733
Location
In Garnacho's boots but untied
Really? Finally saw a ref give us a penalty today; book a player for diving against us and a penalty ruled by VAR.

The ref made some very confusing calls but it was really didn’t feel like any bias towards us today, just a poor ref that really looked lost and overwhelmed
I just mean those three isolated decisions were so unusual that it is suspicious. Match fixing can be based on an individual decision like Dalot foul in second half. It doesn't have to impact the whole game. Also, a team having 'X or more fouls' and bolstering the numbers through such decisions.

Again, he gave three fouls against United without any positive evidence of a foul. He could be grossly incompetent but it could be something else.
 

Bubz27

No I won’t change your tag line
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
21,581
To me it looks like the movement is him trying to actually move his arm away from the ball. Surely we can agree it wasn’t a stonewaller?
I agree it wasn't a stonewall pen but I also say we've lost 5 points recently because of 3 very very soft pens recently. We'd be in CL discussion with those 5 points.

I also think it's important to remember, complaints about qualities of referees aren't just game to game. It's a much bigger picture than what happens in any one match.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,217
The referee made three very suspect decisions. The Dalot free kick for having his shirt pulled. AWB for winning the ball. Maguire for existing at a corner.

You can't rule out match fixing / fixed betting when you see decisions that unusual.
Match fixing?
He won't have done very well for whoever he's "fixing" it for giving a harsh pen v Bourno!
 

Bubz27

No I won’t change your tag line
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
21,581
Really? Finally saw a ref give us a penalty today; book a player for diving against us and a penalty ruled by VAR.

The ref made some very confusing calls but it was really didn’t feel like any bias towards us today, just a poor ref that really looked lost and overwhelmed
Giving clear decisions isn't evidence a referee isn't being biased by the way. Not that I agree with the claim but your argument doesn't work.
 

Golden Nugget

Full Member
Joined
May 7, 2011
Messages
2,236
Giving clear decisions isn't evidence a referee isn't being biased by the way. Not that I agree with the claim but your argument doesn't work.
The VAR call, that was a clear decision.

The penalty definitely wasn’t - I felt it was a penalty but he could definitely not have given it. Even some on here think it’s soft.

The dive, runs through, initiates contact on our player, falls over. We’ve seen two penalties given against us similar scenarios in the last few games.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,317
Just what we need, a soft penalty that probably wasn't to get the media all fixated on. That will be the last decision we get this season.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,217
Why wasn't their keeper sent off for dissent? Got booked for dissent and continued being absolutely rabid towards the ref.
Because that law is exceptionally rarely applied.
Basically just for Dalot that once.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,433
Good/bad, and there’s been so much bad for us this season, VAR is a joke.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,373
Not sure why VAR seemed so fixated on WHERE that late incident happened and not seemingly looking at whether the Bournemouth player ran into Kambwala.

Im not saying it absolutely wasn’t a foul but they didn’t seem to consider it
Haha that was my take too. All the fuss about in or outside the box. Wasn't even a foul.
 

siw2007

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Messages
2,394
The handball is very bizarre, I can’t remember the last time I saw a ball rebound off another player into the arm of another.
It’s a very unlucky scenario for Bournemouth, but he does move his arm towards the ball so it is an infringement and thus a penalty, though somewhat soft.
We had an unlucky penalty against us last week so I’m kind of happy that we got one back.
 

awop

Odds winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Newbie
Joined
Sep 28, 2010
Messages
4,238
Location
Paris
Supports
Arsenal
I just mean those three isolated decisions were so unusual that it is suspicious. Match fixing can be based on an individual decision like Dalot foul in second half. It doesn't have to impact the whole game. Also, a team having 'X or more fouls' and bolstering the numbers through such decisions.

Again, he gave three fouls against United without any positive evidence of a foul. He could be grossly incompetent but it could be something else.
You dropped this :

The only contentious call was United's penalty.I think it was very harsh but in the middle of the mental decisions that happened this season, it's understandable.
 

sugar_kane

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
3,501
I think the ref in our game today recently saw the Seinfeld episode “The Opposite” and was inspired enough to apply that philosophy to all of his decisions today.
 

Bubz27

No I won’t change your tag line
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
21,581
Not sure why VAR seemed so fixated on WHERE that late incident happened and not seemingly looking at whether the Bournemouth player ran into Kambwala.

Im not saying it absolutely wasn’t a foul but they didn’t seem to consider it
They usually go in stages. Maybe once they determined it was in the box, then they'd determine if it was actually a foul.
 

Fr. Todd Unctious

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 23, 2016
Messages
1,831
Location
Craggy Island Prison
The ABU's having a meltdown I see. Oddly didn't have much to say last week...

Paddy Power admin is defintely a dipper. Had to stop following them a while back. Always quick with the childish digs when United get something but say sweet FA when Liverpool get anything
 

Doracle

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,015
The one yesterday was an obvious, if unfortunate, penalty. When it rebounds, he instinctively moves his arm towards the ball. Once he successfully connects with it, it has to be a penalty.
 

Lexicon Red Devil

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 15, 2023
Messages
84
The cheek of articles like this after us being the victim of three dives leading to penalties in the two games beforehand.
The joy has been sucked out of the game thanks to refs and the media. They'd rather people were outraged every week to keep them engaged in the endless debate about VAR. The actual quality of the football on offer across the league is actually pretty poor, so they need to generate interest somehow.

Bournemouth yesterday were diving all over the place and were genuinely painful to watch, yet we're supposed to feel like they were hard done by. United were poor, but Bournemouth deserved nothing for their lack of sportsmanship. The moment their left back grabbed Dalot's shirt and threw himself to the floor was hilariously bad and the ref still fell for it. There are no gentlemen left in the game these days, which makes it hard to actually root for anyone.
 

Bubz27

No I won’t change your tag line
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
21,581
Let's just all enjoy the correct decision we got yesterday because it'll be the last slightly fortuitous call we get all season now, after the narrative that's been built up since.