Cathcart

samabachan

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
Messages
9,896
Location
Football is about glory, it is about doing things
I think Hull would be the perfect club for him. They are really dying for a decent centre half to play alongside Michael Turner - they really struggled when teams worked out that they just needed to attack the other CB (normally Zayatte). Very similar situation to Sunderland who were appalling at the back before Evans went there.
 

PS18

Full Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2004
Messages
2,357
Location
Ruud ftw
Hull would be a nice move if they can add a few other decent players too. As it is, I'd worry that they are nailed-on relegation certs and being on the end of constant defeats, often heavy and rarely his fault, wouldn't be that great for Cathcart's development. Sunderland were struggling when Evans went there second time around, but not to the extent I can see Hull doing this season.
 

prateik

Full Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
42,184
hull will probably sell turner

unless they add some decent players , they will get raped by most teams. . could dent his confidence ..
would get games , but its just as important to be playing/training with good or atleast decent players ..
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
I think we should just keep him in the squad. You can never have too many good defenders. If we can get him 10+ games this season it'll be good for him.

I'm not in favor of loaning our players out because aside from beckham, we've rarely seen the benefits.
 

samabachan

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
Messages
9,896
Location
Football is about glory, it is about doing things
I think we should just keep him in the squad. You can never have too many good defenders. If we can get him 10+ games this season it'll be good for him.

I'm not in favor of loaning our players out because aside from beckham, we've rarely seen the benefits.
Evans, Campbell at Hull, Cleverley...it's been the makings of some players.
 

Decotron

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
28,823
Location
I am not a man........I am Cantona
I think we should just keep him in the squad. You can never have too many good defenders. If we can get him 10+ games this season it'll be good for him.

I'm not in favor of loaning our players out because aside from beckham, we've rarely seen the benefits.
I sort of agree but for different reasons. I think we should only loan players to certain clubs. Clubs the have a tradition of playing good football and clubs with managers who will help our youngsters rather than grind them into the ground and effect their confidence.

Just heard scott sinclar is gone to wigan, thats his 6th club on loan, fecking ridiculous behaviour really.

Ipswich/Forest/Derby clubs with a history whos fans also demand good football are who we should aim to send them to. Obviously in reality it isnt as simple as that but you get the idea.
 

PS18

Full Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2004
Messages
2,357
Location
Ruud ftw
I think we should just keep him in the squad. You can never have too many good defenders. If we can get him 10+ games this season it'll be good for him.

I'm not in favor of loaning our players out because aside from beckham, we've rarely seen the benefits.
But you can have too many good defenders if you have so many that some don't get the games they need. I still think 10+ games would be hugely optimistic - we'd probably need to get to both cup finals and draw relatively low-key opposition all the way through the FA Cup run to get anywhere near 10 games for him. That or a major injury crisis.
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
Evans, Campbell at Hull, Cleverley...it's been the makings of some players.
evans benefited but he was with keane and he got some premiership exeperience.

Campbell did well at hull but it wasn't premiership experience. His stint at spurs you could argue wrecked any chance of a United career because he wasn't allowed to show what he can do

Cleverly again wasn't premiership experience and now we're looking to loan him out perhaps again - so I don't think he's 'advanced' in any respect.

I would agree someone like hull perhaps though they didn't really trust manucho enough. We know what happened there.

If he was assured to play in a certain amount of games then it'd be good but I think it's better us looking after our own

The thing is too, over the last 3 years we've had so many injuries to defenders. I'd just prefer we looked after his development
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
But you can have too many good defenders if you have so many that some don't get the games they need. I still think 10+ games would be hugely optimistic - we'd probably need to get to both cup finals and draw relatively low-key opposition all the way through the FA Cup run to get anywhere near 10 games for him. That or a major injury crisis.
well ps18 we're talking about a young kid here. If we did well in the cups, that would be 10 games + easy. Ofcourse it'd mean we'd have to do well in the cup competitions but everythings a risk.

Normally i'd say your right but over the last 3 years - our defenders has been the main area where we've suffered. I remember the ac milan game. Prior to the injuries, we thought we were strong there

The thing is I think the games he played will have convinced Sir Alex to keep him here. I think he'd have featured against valencia if he hadn't have been injured.

He doesn't have premiership experience but I think people like cleverly, de laet perhaps will go on loan. We'll just have to wait and see though how it works out
 

PS18

Full Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2004
Messages
2,357
Location
Ruud ftw
Of course we're talking about a young kid, I'm well aware of that. That's sort of the point really - players his age need games to progress. If the option comes up of a decent loan move where he can play every week, even at the top end of the Championship, that for me is far better than taking a big gamble, keeping him here, hoping we progress to the latter stages of both cups, and even then barely getting him ten games.

I guess what it comes down to for me is this - the best possible scenario with him staying at OT in my opinion is getting around 10 games if we progress in the cups. And I'd happily forego that to see him get 30/40 games at a decent club elsewhere. And that's the best case scenario. A more realistic scenario is maybe 5/6 games, and there's a perfectly plausible scenario whereby we exit both cups early and keep the senior defenders fit which would leave him struggling to make 1/2 appearances, and having to rely on reserve football.

It's not even a cert that he'd get cup games if he stayed here - if everyone's fit, Wes and Evans aren't going to be getting regular games (or JOS and Evans if Wes is starting at RB) so SAF could easily decide to pair them in CC games.

The AC Milan game and that run at the end of 06/07 was a freak run of injuries though - Neville, Ferdinand, Vidic all out, Evra in and out of the side. And we didn't have the depth then that we do now, even without Cathcart.

I'm not the games he played can have really convinced SAF of anything - he only played one full game, plus 20 minutes as sub against Bayern. SAF may have been convinced before, but I can't see him having his mind made up by 110 minutes of football.
 

Chris H

Video Posting God
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
6,574
Cleverly again wasn't premiership experience and now we're looking to loan him out perhaps again - so I don't think he's 'advanced' in any respect.
Huh? You don't go from zero-to-Premiership quality overnight, there are many steps along the way. Playing a few months of competitive football for successful League One side was bound to have been a good experience for a young lad like Cleverley. Much more useful than playing Reserve football. Fergie says there are Premiership teams in for him now - that probably wouldn't happen without last season's loan.
Campbell did well at hull but it wasn't premiership experience. His stint at spurs you could argue wrecked any chance of a United career because he wasn't allowed to show what he can do
Nonsense, it was a single season where he was underutilized. Before and after, he spent time training with United, and he had a the full season at Hull to showcase his talents. Sir Alex had ample opportunity to determine if Campbell was going to make an impact at United, and he decided that he didn't. Tottenham didn't help Campbell much, but it hardly ruined him.
 

Chris H

Video Posting God
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
6,574
I'm not in favor of loaning our players out because aside from beckham, we've rarely seen the benefits.
Beckham is merely the most famous United player to have spent time on loan. He's not a good example of a player who greatly benefited though, because he only played five matches at Preston North End.

Current United players to have gained valuable experience on loan near the beginning of their careers include John O'Shea, Ben Foster and Darron Gibson. To say nothing of the millions of extra pounds in transfer fees we've received for young players like Kieran Richardson who went on loan. Without that time in the shop window they'd have been worth next to nothing.
 

PS18

Full Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2004
Messages
2,357
Location
Ruud ftw
Nonsense, it was a single season where he was underutilized. Before and after, he spent time training with United, and he had a the full season at Hull to showcase his talents. Sir Alex had ample determine if Campbell was going to make an impact at United, and he decided that he didn't. Tottenham didn't help Campbell much, but it hardly ruined him.
And like you've said about Richardson in the other post, that Hull loan spell is essentially the reason we've got £3.5m for him this summer, with potentially another £2.5m to come.
 

datura

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
11,330
Location
A substandard bag of meat and bones.
But you can have too many good defenders if you have so many that some don't get the games they need. I still think 10+ games would be hugely optimistic - we'd probably need to get to both cup finals and draw relatively low-key opposition all the way through the FA Cup run to get anywhere near 10 games for him. That or a major injury crisis.
Agreed, if he's playing regularly at Premiership level, or even at a good Championship side he has a very good chance of breaking into the senior Northern Ireland side too which he'd really benefit from. I think more than ay position, centre back is something you improve with from playing as many games as possible as along with your natural attributes you're reading of the game, positioning, decision making etc improves but only if you are being challenged.

Unfortunatly for the most part reserve football isn't particularly high quality and and no one should really be playing it for more than a couple of seasons at the most and the loan deals are the way around it - giving players experience where the results mean something and you are playing against experienced pros. You can easily stagnate in the reserves.
 

Elliott

Likes Loan Stickies
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
12,136
Yeah, I can't see him going anywhere during this window.
 

Stobzilla

Official Team Perv
Joined
Jun 7, 2004
Messages
21,938
Location
Grove Street, home.
Got caught under the ball not really defending for West Brom's opener today, didn't seem like he could do too much about the others.
 

samabachan

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
Messages
9,896
Location
Football is about glory, it is about doing things
Given our defensive difficulties, is there any chance of us recalling him early from his loan? I have to say that I have had high hopes of Cathcart making it to the first team for a while, but he seems to be having a very tough time of it on loan (at Watford in case anyone was unaware). Admittedly it's so hard to say with defenders because experience and maturity are more essential there than anywhere else (and of course not everyone is Jonny Evans), but so far he's not taking his chance the way Evans did at Sunderland.
 

Chris H

Video Posting God
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
6,574
The fact that he's not impressing at Watford means that Ferguson will probably prefer to field Fletcher or Carrick in defense. Might have been different if he'd been playing as well as Cleverley is, but he really isn't.
 

Alwyn

Got rid of his pee
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
11,613
Location
-)
I'd be very surprised if he was recalled from his loan. Is it season-long?
 

PS18

Full Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2004
Messages
2,357
Location
Ruud ftw
Have a feeling Watford fans would quite like us to bring him back... :(

I reckon we shoul have gone with Harely for Dustcart at 60. 3-5-2 would bullied the modfield and improved the set play quality.
Another three points dropped. And can we drop Carthorse over the Irish Sea. He'd make far more of a splash than he has done here.
Craig Cathcart's mistake again - costs us again - he doesn't seem very clever.
A bigger problem is Cathcart being consistently woeful every single game. If we wanted a young, ****, inexperienced CB who would be likely to make mistakes we could have played an academy lad. He is absolutely awful.
Cathcart has been utter cr@p since he started, he hasn't improved, and costs us goals through stupid mistakes. Anyone who witnessed his West Brom performance will be able to tell you he is probably the worst CB we have had for many years, bar Matt Jackson of course, but he doesn't really count because he didn't play.
Etc etc. Bit baffled really, some kids you wonder if they'll sink or swim (Cleverley for example could have gone either way) but with a solid half-season in the Champ under his belt already and looking so composed in his few first-team appearances (albeit friendlies) I didn't think Cathcart would struggle with Watford at all.
 

x42bn6

Full Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
18,887
Location
西田麻衣の谷間. Being a nerd, geek and virgin
In truth, Watford were going to find it difficult to get anything out of an impressive Newcastle side. No excuse for his silly backpass though.

Will be interesting to see whether Watford want to extend his loan or not. I think they might, by virtue of the fact Cathcart is the tallest in the squad. Watford are probably the only team who will field a back four of which only one is above 6'! Defensively from set-pieces, they are woeful.
 

PS18

Full Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2004
Messages
2,357
Location
Ruud ftw
Unfortunately those are the sort of comments he seems to be getting every week (while Cleverley on the other hand they absolutely adore).
 

Decotron

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
28,823
Location
I am not a man........I am Cantona
Unfortunately those are the sort of comments he seems to be getting every week (while Cleverley on the other hand they absolutely adore).

Ive been keeping a eye on a watford forum for a while now and I agree. Its great learning curve for him but I dont think hes anywhere near Jonny Evans level at the same age.