Raphael Varane | Signed for United!

Status
Not open for further replies.

MUFC OK

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
7,216
Players who don’t support United (or maybe even some that do) don’t think about the same things that we fans do.

They consider recent trophies and the set up of he club, in conjunction with the location.

Unfortunately Chelsea are based in London which is massively more attractive than Manchester to foreign players and they’ve won things, big things more recently than us, plus the manager has a bigger reputation that ours.

We love our club but footballers don’t really love any club, they just look at what is best for their careers. Really the only thing we do better than Chelsea currently is over pay players, which does attract a certain type at least.

Remove your emotion from it and look at it rationally instead.
How many of our best players during SAF's tenure would have joined if we weren't competing for the league every year? Pretty sure I've heard many ex players say they because of the guarantee of trophies. Lets be honest, Chelsea are creating their own history. Some will be surprised by how they match up beside other English clubs since Abramovic joined or even the last 10 years.
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
You use the point that we finished ahead of them as some sort of positive but when I bring up the fact that he has out performed our manager by the same metric since coming into the club, it's a pointless statistic?

Also he beat the best team in Spain and the best team in England, arguably the world on his way to his title win. So yes, I'd say they are a better footballing club than the mighty second place United who registered two shots on goal in 120 minutes against middle table Villareal in their b-tech European final
Go ahead with comparing their best games/performances to our worst.

Why not roll that train of thought out across the league and in fact when they tried to throw away 4th place on the last day against Villa? Or losing to Arsenal and Leicester in the two games prior?

Kante turned up in the big games, he’s a game changer for them when he’s on it.

I’m not actually trying to take anything away from Tuchel, what is annoying is the knee jerk here to disrespect our own club and label Chelsea the most attractive team in Europe whilst we are apparently nowhere near as appealing to them... boll@x.

It’s the self loathing I hate amongst our fanbase, it’s a pathetic and weak trait and doesn’t suit our club. That’s not aimed at you, just generally.
 

Kostov

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2017
Messages
9,417
Location
Skopje, Macedonia
You're only talking like this because you followed the saga at face value. I followed the Havertz saga on twitter from the start there was a lot of noise around it and Leverkusen even apparently delayed a deal from happening sooner because they wanted to get further in the Europa League Chelsea fans themselves were getting annoyed. Sancho was a noisier saga but Utd despite what people think made the right call walking away from BVB's demands NOBODY was ever paying £108m UP FRONT during a pandemic the mistake we made was not walking away sooner to reinvest in other areas. The other guy was right though this defiast everyone is better than Utd mentality that is over stretched and over sensationalized by doom mongerers is exaggerated and pointless. I don't see a DM happening but Sancho, Trippier and a CB is very realistic and a good window
Of course we all followed the saga for Sancho closer and more personal, but at the end of the day, they got it over the line, while we did not, went into the season without a needed reinforcement, and in general had a poor window, leaving the same gaps we still have in the team. No it was not the right call, we finished another season trophyless, we still need a RW, CDM and a CB urgently, and we won't get them because we wasted a summer without closing those problematic positions. The other guy is wearing his United tinted glasses, dismissing a CL win just because it is a tournament and how it is not that big of a deal Chelsea getting their second trophy, while for all our history gloating we have only 3 of those. And if we are a bit more realistic, it really isn't about Chelsea as much as it is about our own season finish and general sentiment. We bottled results in the league and getting second is nothing to gloat about, while getting embarrassed by Liverpool at our own ground. Some of you need a reality check or you will get disappointed come the finish of next season, unless you feel we can win the title with a CB, Trippier and Sancho, while we still get to play Fred in cdm.

Getting Varane I feel would transform our backline along with Sancho our right side. However we also need a starting CDM, or we win feck all again.
 

theklr

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
2,659
How many of our best players during SAF's tenure would have joined if we weren't competing for the league every year? Pretty sure I've heard many ex players say they because of the guarantee of trophies. Lets be honest, Chelsea are creating their own history. Some will be surprised by how they match up beside other English clubs since Abramovic joined or even the last 10 years.
Another reason for Chelsea is that everyone can see they are a extremly well-run club with one of the best financial backing in Europe at the moment.

Players will see that they will do absolutely everything to be competative .

Even though we still have the possibilty of competing with them financially , everything else has been a major mess the last couple of years until Ole came in.

So in general the only upside with us is the historical allure and global fan base / reputation, which still do hold sway over at least players growing up when we were dominant.

The only caveat with Chelsea that I can see except that, is the constant changing of managers and players.

Things can change in an instant , and players will more easily fall out of grace if the new manager prefer a certain type of system/players.

But that wont be a problem for the elite players I'd guess.
 

MUFC OK

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
7,216
Another reason for Chelsea is that everyone can see they are a extremly well-run club with one of the best financial backing in Europe at the moment.

Players will see that they will do absolutely everything to be competative .
This is true, Chelsea have remained competitive since 2005, winning a trophy every year more or less, despite changing their manager many many times. Yet at United we are expected to believe that the reason we arent winning is that we arent giving managers long enough....
 

red_de_pologne

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
3,628
Location
Warsaw, Poland
Another reason for Chelsea is that everyone can see they are a extremly well-run club with one of the best financial backing in Europe at the moment.

Players will see that they will do absolutely everything to be competative .

Even though we still have the possibilty of competing with them financially , everything else has been a major mess the last couple of years until Ole came in.

So in general the only upside with us is the historical allure and global fan base / reputation, which still do hold sway over at least players growing up when we were dominant.

The only caveat with Chelsea that I can see except that, is the constant changing of managers and players.

Things can change in an instant , and players will more easily fall out of grace if the new manager prefer a certain type of system/players.

But that wont be a problem for the elite players I'd guess.
But if you sign for United, we will be extending your contract forever, regardless of form.
 

Joseunited

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2016
Messages
1,905
Another reason for Chelsea is that everyone can see they are a extremly well-run club with one of the best financial backing in Europe at the moment.

Players will see that they will do absolutely everything to be competative .

Even though we still have the possibilty of competing with them financially , everything else has been a major mess the last couple of years until Ole came in.

So in general the only upside with us is the historical allure and global fan base / reputation, which still do hold sway over at least players growing up when we were dominant.

The only caveat with Chelsea that I can see except that, is the constant changing of managers and players.

Things can change in an instant , and players will more easily fall out of grace if the new manager prefer a certain type of system/players.

But that wont be a problem for the elite players I'd guess.
In what regard considering just 3 lines down you talk of manager/player turnover.
 

RkkMan

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
2,179
Of course we all followed the saga for Sancho closer and more personal, but at the end of the day, they got it over the line, while we did not, went into the season without a needed reinforcement, and in general had a poor window, leaving the same gaps we still have in the team. No it was not the right call, we finished another season trophyless, we still need a RW, CDM and a CB urgently, and we won't get them because we wasted a summer without closing those problematic positions. The other guy is wearing his United tinted glasses, dismissing a CL win just because it is a tournament and how it is not that big of a deal Chelsea getting their second trophy, while for all our history gloating we have only 3 of those. And if we are a bit more realistic, it really isn't about Chelsea as much as it is about our own season finish and general sentiment. We bottled results in the league and getting second is nothing to gloat about, while getting embarrassed by Liverpool at our own ground. Some of you need a reality check or you will get disappointed come the finish of next season, unless you feel we can win the title with a CB, Trippier and Sancho, while we still get to play Fred in cdm.

Getting Varane I feel would transform our backline along with Sancho our right side. However we also need a starting CDM, or we win feck all again.
Besides Mbappe(Neymar hasnt been successful to me) name one player that cost over £100m that's been a success. Price tags have a more detrimental effect on players than you think due to the massive pressure it comes with. As good as Sancho is £108m would have been a financially irresponsible investment during a pandemic coming from the Bundesliga there's a good chance he'd have been Werner 2.0 with that fee instead of a major success works both ways it's not set in stone he'd have helped us win the PL or anything else. What he'll cost now reflects his value much more.
Utd's CL titles were EARNED through grit, hard work and heritage not selling our souls. Even though the number isn't satisfying enough in your eyes I'd rather ours than Chelsea's who are where they are only because a Russian Oligarch decided to play Football Manager with their team.
 

theklr

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
2,659
In what regard considering just 3 lines down you talk of manager/player turnover.
Well, that has both a positive and negative effect I guess - but my point is that they always sack a manager when it doesnt work and bring in a highly regarded or successful new one (and usually have success with that)
 

Pickle85

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
6,530
They're the European Champions, we didnt make it our of the group stage and havent been in a final in over 10 years. Players on the continent and overseas are more concerned with CL performance than whether we finished above them in the league..
Love how people say this with such absolute certainty, like there aren't many other factors (pay; club profile etc) that players would take into consideration.
 

HailtotheKing

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
1,015
Location
NYC
Our first eleven is similar to Chelsea’s but their bench and overall squad is much better I think. They have a better manager, a richer owner, better negotiators and they’re in London. Recognising that right now they probably offer a better proposition to a lot of players, doesn’t mean we don’t love our own club any less. It’s just rational thinking. And saying we’re better because we finished higher in the league this year means very little when the season was as it was and they had afrank Lampard for most of it. Tuchel did more more in 3 months than Ole has done on 3 years in terms of success on the pitch.
 

theklr

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
2,659
Our first eleven is similar to Chelsea’s but their bench and overall squad is much better I think. They have a better manager, a richer owner, better negotiators and they’re in London. Recognising that right now they probably offer a better proposition to a lot of players, doesn’t mean we don’t love our own club any less. It’s just rational thinking. And saying we’re better because we finished higher in the league this year means very little when the season was as it was and they had afrank Lampard for most of it. Tuchel did more more in 3 months than Ole has done on 3 years in terms of success on the pitch.
Id like to think Ole would have done quite much better if he had the same squad quality as Chelsea did when Tuchel took over.

I mean , if you look at some of the starting line-ups we've had earlier, and the fact that some of our players are run into the ground because we have a lack of options, I'd say he did fairly well with what he's got (most of the time).
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,164
Location
...
Every time I pop into this thread all I see is a few United fans trying their best to convince everyone that United aren’t shit.

Hopefully Varane disagrees.
 

Pickle85

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
6,530
Every time I pop into this thread all I see is a few United fans trying their best to convince everyone that United aren’t shit.

Hopefully Varane disagrees.
Yup, it's bizarre. If you believe some, we're now a totally undesirable prospect because...because...because...Chelsea won the CL or something. That's ignoring all the evidence pointing to us being just about to sign one of the most talented youngsters in world football.
 

HailtotheKing

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
1,015
Location
NYC
Id like to think Ole would have done quite much better if he had the same squad quality as Chelsea did when Tuchel took over.

I mean , if you look at some of the starting line-ups we've had earlier, and the fact that some of our players are run into the ground because we have a lack of options, I'd say he did fairly well with what he's got (most of the time).
I'm sure he would have. But that's my point and other people's point, we don't have as good a squad as Chelsea. There's no shame in admitting that's true. It's proven by Ole running players into the ground because he didn't trust the others. The converse is also true of course. It's quite possible that Tuchel given our squad would have done better than Ole. Not better in the table of course, but in terms of stability and play. I like Ole, I think he's a good man-manager. But he needs better coaches if he's going to take us any further. Fergie was a master at that. Also, that cup final was a showcase of his shortcomings. He may as have been watching the game with us. I pray he learned from that.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
I'm sure he would have. But that's my point and other people's point, we don't have as good a squad as Chelsea. There's no shame in admitting that's true. It's proven by Ole running players into the ground because he didn't trust the others. The converse is also true of course. It's quite possible that Tuchel given our squad would have done better than Ole. Not better in the table of course, but in terms of stability and play. I like Ole, I think he's a good man-manager. But he needs better coaches if he's going to take us any further. Fergie was a master at that. Also, that cup final was a showcase of his shortcomings. He may as have been watching the game with us. I pray he learned from that.
A great squad doesnt finish 4th in the league twice in a row. Their shit league form and reaching 3 finals in 2 seasons points to them being a cup team rayher than having any sort of depth in excellence.
 

HailtotheKing

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
1,015
Location
NYC
A great squad doesnt finish 4th in the league twice in a row. Their shit league form and reaching 3 finals in 2 seasons points to them being a cup team rayher than having any sort of depth in excellence.
Agree in principle but not in reality. They brought in a shed load of quality players that they had to integrate. Frank wasn't up to the job. Tuchel most definitely is. Anything pre-Tuchel is pretty much moot in my opinion. It's like two eras, pre and post-Tuchel. And post-Tuchel is a different beast. He worked miracles honestly. He solidified their defence and could easily have done the double. Gonna be tough. He hasn't even brought in any of his own players yet. Hopefully, that will be his downfall but I doubt it.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Agree in principle but not in reality. They brought in a shed load of quality players that they had to integrate. Frank wasn't up to the job. Tuchel most definitely is. Anything pre-Tuchel is pretty much moot in my opinion. It's like two eras, pre and post-Tuchel. And post-Tuchel is a different beast. He worked miracles honestly. He solidified their defence and could easily have done the double. Gonna be tough. He hasn't even brought in any of his own players yet. Hopefully, that will be his downfall but I doubt it.
But post Frank had Tuchel win rate drop like a stone after the new manager bounce. That was a piss poor run in from them. Plus we cant pretend this forum didnt praise Frank etc at the start of last season as well. Its almost as if posters wants them to be better than what we have.
Ive gone full circle on Tuchel. I think last season was a fantastic acheivement with a team that isnt all that imo but that is being taken away by pretending Chelsea are suddenly this super squad. With all their money spent the front 3 are still inconsistent and need improving upon.
 

HailtotheKing

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
1,015
Location
NYC
But post Frank had Tuchel win rate drop like a stone after the new manager bounce. That was a piss poor run in from them. Plus we cant pretend this forum didnt praise Frank etc at the start of last season as well. Its almost as if posters wants them to be better than what we have.
Ive gone full circle on Tuchel. I think last season was a fantastic acheivement with a team that isnt all that imo but that is being taken away by pretending Chelsea are suddenly this super squad. With all their money spent the front 3 are still inconsistent and need improving upon.
Yeah, I thought Frank was doing ok and didn't deserve to be fired. But I've thought the same about a fair few manager sackings. Leicester and Southampton for example. Regardless of their drop in form, I believe they still won more points than us since Tuchel took over. Both of us had big finals to play for at the end of the season. City, their opponents were able to totally take their foot off the gas. Villareal, our opponents were playing for their Euro future against Real Madrid. Yet we were the ones who played crap at the end of the day. Our manager shat the bed, Tuchel didn't. Chelsea has a better manager and they have a better squad. Not team but squad. And they also have better owners. Just my opinion of course.
 

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
36,783
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
Madrid are looking for cash. They've already gotten Alaba for free who can replace Varane. So they could see selling Varane as a good way to get money
That's right, they wouldn't be sad to see him leave. However, they aren't trying to push him out. They want him to stay, but if Varane's not committed, they won't push hard to convince him to stay. They'll open the door and let him walk out as long expecting a decent sum of money in return.

They're basically doing what United did to some of their big-name players like Ruud and Beckham i.e. "you're not bigger than the club".
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Yeah, I thought Frank was doing ok and didn't deserve to be fired. But I've thought the same about a fair few manager sackings. Leicester and Southampton for example. Regardless of their drop in form, I believe they still won more points than us since Tuchel took over. Both of us had big finals to play for at the end of the season. City, their opponents were able to totally take their foot off the gas. Villareal, our opponents were playing for their Euro future against Real Madrid. Yet we were the ones who played crap at the end of the day. Our manager shat the bed, Tuchel didn't. Chelsea has a better manager and they have a better squad. Not team but squad. And they also have better owners. Just my opinion of course.
A strong squad doesn't scrape 4th. I just can't get my head around that. Scraping fourth means they are struggling to consistently implement their style on the first 11 never mind on players behind that.
Pulisic has had a poor season, rumoured to leave. Giroud faded away, Abraham is as good as gone. The Ajax player is a flop and CHO is used as WB as much as wideman.
I mean they have names but where are the performances? Its Werner, Havertz and Mount that influences their play (for better or worse) and little else. For all of the squad talk the actual performance pool is shallow.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,890
Location
France
A strong squad doesn't scrape 4th. I just can't get my head around that. Scraping fourth means they are struggling to consistently implement their style on the first 11 never mind on players behind that.
Pulisic has had a poor season, rumoured to leave. Giroud faded away, Abraham is as good as gone. The Ajax player is a flop and CHO is used as WB as much as wideman.
I mean they have names but where are the performances? Its Werner, Havertz and Mount that influences their play (for better or worse) and little else. For all of the squad talk the actual performance pool is shallow.
You better take that back, he is at the top of his power. :nono:
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
Does anyone here actually think Varane is going to sign for us?
Didn’t Woodward say Varane was the only player he’d break the bank for or something a few year’s ago?

It’s hard to say because I don’t know Varane’s mentality, maybe he would relish the prospect of an United challenge or maybe he’s fine being the Roll Royce in a multimillion pound assembled team, but one thing for sure is we could be doing with him.
 

theklr

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
2,659
Does anyone here actually think Varane is going to sign for us?
I’d be very suprised. Its hard to say since we’re the go to club for clickbait and Real Madrid contract renewal bumps.

But seeing Torres has a RC that could be done quite quickly, it does absolutely seem like the club is at least waiting to see.
 

Red4Life_#7

Full Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
1,112
My worry would be that we again sign a player for a long contract for big money and on a high salary, and he shows to be on the wrong side of his peak.
Agreed!! But anything is an upgrade on Lindelof.
 

Valencia Shin Crosses

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
6,777
Location
"Martial...He's isolated Skrtel here..."
Besides Mbappe(Neymar hasnt been successful to me) name one player that cost over £100m that's been a success. Price tags have a more detrimental effect on players than you think due to the massive pressure it comes with. As good as Sancho is £108m would have been a financially irresponsible investment during a pandemic coming from the Bundesliga there's a good chance he'd have been Werner 2.0 with that fee instead of a major success works both ways it's not set in stone he'd have helped us win the PL or anything else. What he'll cost now reflects his value much more.
Utd's CL titles were EARNED through grit, hard work and heritage not selling our souls. Even though the number isn't satisfying enough in your eyes I'd rather ours than Chelsea's who are where they are only because a Russian Oligarch decided to play Football Manager with their team.
Neymar hasn't been successful hahahahahah alright mate
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,083
Does anyone here actually think Varane is going to sign for us?
No. It's hard to see. He's very very accomplished so I imagine he would want a team that is known for winning and ambitious. If Juve PSG or Chelsea come calling I think we would be below the pecking order only if he's just weighing the possibilities of adding to his accomplishments
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,729
Some nobody ITK on twitter called James Stuarts is convinced he will accept their new offer and reject us & PSG, mind you he is also convinced that Romano will report the Sancho agreement in a few days as well
 

peridigm

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
13,859
Some nobody ITK on twitter called James Stuarts is convinced he will accept their new offer and reject us & PSG, mind you he is also convinced that Romano will report the Sancho agreement in a few days as well
Two fairly obvious predictions could be made by anyone on the planet and have a 99% chance of being true.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,729
No, we've all decided he's too intimidated by Victor Lindelof and knows he couldn't possibly replace such a master of the defensive arts.
The thing that worries me is if any other CB is signed and I would include Kounde/Torres is that Ole still plays Lindelof
 

Real Madras

Full Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2016
Messages
1,068
Location
London
Supports
Real Oviedo
Apparently Varane has told Real Madrid he would like to leave in the summer to join PSG. I will cry if this happens. According to El Confidential. Not really confidential then is it.
 

bosskeano

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2020
Messages
5,131
Apparently Varane has told Real Madrid he would like to leave in the summer to join PSG. I will cry if this happens. According to El Confidential. Not really confidential then is it.
that would suck if he chose Madrid as he's honestly my first choice to partner Maguire plus it may hinder us from potentially selling Pogba to PSG which needs to happen.

I'm not sold on Torres for the premier league or Jules Kounde. It'll put us right back to the starting point trying to find a CB who's got the goods to handle playing at Old Trafford.
 

Real Madras

Full Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2016
Messages
1,068
Location
London
Supports
Real Oviedo
that would suck if he chose Madrid as he's honestly my first choice to partner Maguire plus it may hinder us from potentially selling Pogba to PSG which needs to happen.

I'm not sold on Torres for the premier league or Jules Kounde. It'll put us right back to the starting point trying to find a CB who's got the goods to handle playing at Old Trafford.
I agree. It has to be him or Ramos.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.