Was Louis Van Gaal our best "coach" in the post Fergie years?

nakpodiareuben

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2022
Messages
468
To start off, I'll say his recruitment was dreadful and his vision for football downright sleep inducing at times.

But in terms of the influence he had over the players individually and as a group, to me he was clearly the best at getting them to do what he wanted on the pitch. That was clear from the first couple of games he took charge in. You knew what you were expecting from his team when they went out on the pitch - even if it wasn't pretty. The players I think also developed best under him - he had a transformative effect especially on Smalling and De Gea. De Gea was sweeping under him and became a lot more comfortable coming out of the box. Smalling became a more dominant CB.

His signings were genuinely dreadful though. His vision was outdated, but his implementation of it was actually quite good. Anyone else feel the same way?
He was cooking something. He just never had the Ayers he really wanted. Delay was not really ready for the big league and Do maria never wanted to come to united.we were dominating teams and playing Attracting football. The problem was the intensity...too Slow and lots of backward passes. I don't think his signings was that bad. Sneiderlin, Rojo, blind....A lot of technical players. The fans and Mou availability made himlose his job.i still think he was a far better coach than Mou and Ole. Of we had givenhim more time, maybe we would have been at city level now
 

nakpodiareuben

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2022
Messages
468
His recruitment was terrible though and that's what let him down, perhaps in hindsight we could've benefited from a DOF.

Di Maria
Schneiderlin
Bastian
Valdes
Falcao
Damian
Memphis
Rojo
Blind
Herrera
Shaw

Completely gutted the squad and sold decent players like Rafael, Nani, chicharito. He did implement a certain style but in many terms he set us so back with woeful recruitment and getting rid of our decent squad players.

Mou did worst. Even Ole was no better.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,091
His recruitment was terrible though and that's what let him down, perhaps in hindsight we could've benefited from a DOF.

Di Maria
Schneiderlin
Bastian
Valdes
Falcao
Damian
Memphis
Rojo
Blind
Herrera
Shaw

Completely gutted the squad and sold decent players like Rafael, Nani, chicharito. He did implement a certain style but in many terms he set us so back with woeful recruitment and getting rid of our decent squad players.
The thing is he fell out with the DOFs and senior figures at the clubs he worked at.

LVG actually had a drama free tenure at the club because he nobody meddled with him. But it's a double edged sword
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,575
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
What do you mean post Fergie. Louis van Gaal is the best coach of all time in any sport ever. Just ask Louis van Gaal.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
119,975
Location
Dublin, Ireland
He was cooking something. He just never had the Ayers he really wanted. Delay was not really ready for the big league and Do maria never wanted to come to united.we were dominating teams and playing Attracting football. The problem was the intensity...too Slow and lots of backward passes. I don't think his signings was that bad. Sneiderlin, Rojo, blind....A lot of technical players. The fans and Mou availability made himlose his job.i still think he was a far better coach than Mou and Ole. Of we had givenhim more time, maybe we would have been at city level now
..waking up from his dream anytime now

can’t believe that there are still LVG groupies running around. It was a failed experiment- he turned all the fans off and that only leads to one way
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,865
Location
France
People complaining about LVG recruitment are vindicating Glazers and Ed.
LVG asked for Kroos and Kante, got Schneiderlin and finished Bastian.
Asked for Lewandowski, Neymar, Hummels, Ramos…

The board didn’t deliver.
So he asked for players that weren't available and you think that it's an argument in his favor? Also Kroos was contacted by United before LVG, he vetoed it while Kanté wanted to move to London.
 

Black Alabaster

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 29, 2022
Messages
123
..waking up from his dream anytime now

can’t believe that there are still LVG groupies running around. It was a failed experiment- he turned all the fans off and that only leads to one way
It's interesting there are two opposing visions of his time where in one Van Gaal was a failure for X Y Z reasons, and one where he was really onto something but was cut short too early.

I actually believe OP is right and the dissenters are too as i've seen a lot of the reasoning like player recruitment/club structure brought up and they are quite valid.

Yes some of the football ended up being snore inducing and extremely dull which will turn off a lot of long-time match going fans that pay decent wedge to rock up and be entertained, and yes some of the signings really missed the mark but he was also operating under the stewardship of prime Football Director Ed Woodward & Matt Judge which needs massive consideration.

As some have pointed out in here already his system is actually the closest to Pep's positional system and we did play some scintilating positional pass & move stuff sometimes when it actually came together but the biggest problem is it just did not come together often enough and I do put that down partially to our available players not being up to it. Juan Mata was great under Van Gaal though and that is no suprise considering. He gave us Juanfield that was glorius.

Van Gaal blooded Rashford albeit in fortuitous injury circumstance and guided him well, I think enough people in here have said it to be honest that it doesn't need hammering home more but if Van Gaal was given more time after winning that cup and was able to keep exploring the market and secure his #1 targets to realise his vision of how we should be playing football, I definitely believe he could of been more successful than he was in the end. Not saying he was perfect but we certainly left something on the table there that we seem to of picked back up with ETH after a few years of counter-attacking football.

Even Di Maria who ended up snaking off gave 3 goals 10 assists in 27 games he was not a flop at all and had some fantastic games. Depay we gave up on a bit early too as it's shown there was a player there and he had a good link-up with Luke Shaw, the dressing room was just not right with a fading Rooney with Carrick & fletcher the last "culture leaders".

So he asked for players that weren't available and you think that it's an argument in his favor? Also Kroos was contacted by United before LVG, he vetoed it while Kanté wanted to move to London.
Not sure he actually vetoed it he was away with Dutch squad and Kroos has said in interview he just didn't hear concrete info back from united before Madrid sniffed the situation and called him. Maybe being charitable to LVG there but would be odd considering his judge of talent and also later bringing it schweinsteiger that he would turn his nose up at Kroos.

I think this plays into his post-sacking statement he has made since aswell really about us being a commercial and marketing club not a serious football club as many foreign european people in the game probably imagined us to be on the inside. LVG is oldschool of course he has seen us in our pomp and he was a big manager so those names with our club probably didn't seem like a stretch. Zlatan made the same observation about expecting grandeur in footballing operation but shock and suprise at our insular "small minded" approach i think he put it as. Didn't cover themselves in glory but certainly victims of the time too without doubt.
 

Maticmaker

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
4,687
LvG's philosophy of " your opponent cannot score whilst you have the ball" underpinned everything he did as a manager/coach. In one game we had 46 passes before we scored.

LvG's recent reported comments in Qatar, to a Dutch journalist who complained of the style of play he had the Netherlands playing was... " if you are bored ...go home"...it says it all. Louie did, and still does things 'his way'.

You could argue that the underpinning philosophy of 'keeping the ball' is tactically correct, if you eventually do something with it; but becomes exceptionally boring to watch, especially when at United he didn't have enough players who were good enough to execute that idea.

He was respected and admired by many players and as other posters have mentioned brought out the best in some of our players. He probably was the best Manager we had since SAF, but he was also something of a 'yesterday's' man, who has retired twice previously, and found himself hauled back into harness... pity his long-suffering wife who he apparently promised to take on an around the world Golfing holiday after he left United... wonder did he ever keep his promise?
 

DrogaPortoroz

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 22, 2022
Messages
74
That game against WHU still hurts me. If Lingard and co. didn't bottle it like cowards we would finish top4, no CL for City.
Vangle was boring but he had a long term plan. And I would take boring anytime than trashing by any club under the sun.
Is he only manager who does not have any big deafeat ?
 

Black Alabaster

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 29, 2022
Messages
123
LvG's philosophy of " your opponent cannot score whilst you have the ball" underpinned everything he did as a manager/coach. In one game we had 46 passes before we scored.

LvG's recent reported comments in Qatar, to a Dutch journalist who complained of the style of play he had the Netherlands playing was... " if you are bored ...go home"...it says it all. Louie did, and still does things 'his way'.

You could argue that the underpinning philosophy of 'keeping the ball' is tactically correct, if you eventually do something with it; but becomes exceptionally boring to watch, especially when at United he didn't have enough players who were good enough to execute that idea.

He was respected and admired by many players and as other posters have mentioned brought out the best in some of our players
. He probably was the best Manager we had since SAF, but he was also something of a 'yesterday's' man, who has retired twice previously, and found himself hauled back into harness... pity his long-suffering wife who he apparently promised to take on an around the world Golfing holiday after he left United... wonder did he ever keep his promise?
Well said mate, accurate too.
pity his long-suffering wife who he apparently promised to take on an around the world Golfing holiday after he left United... wonder did he ever keep his promise?
I can't posts links or media yet but I would direct you to clip of him from last weeks netherlands training media session where infront of all the cameras he is offering his wife out a trip to their hotel room. Seems they are well taken care of :lol: . That along with him hugging and posing for picture with a new journalist at a press conference, he hasn't lost a step. Do miss his entertaining shenanigans.

Altho Erics' "eh" & "clear" is humorous in its own right too.
 

Zed 101

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
1,451
From the perspective of whether or not I enjoyed watching the football under LVG the answer is no, as ever the what if's exists but purely on a enjoyment level, LVG would be behind Solskjaer and ETH, probably on par with Mou
 

VanDeBank

Ma’am
Joined
May 13, 2021
Messages
4,862
This thread basically reminds me of the tough question, would you rather sleep with your sister or your mother...... either way you're literally screwed and neither are what you want.

I'd rather have the lads in the team coach themselves over going to any of the managers that we've had bar Rangnick who was only going to be interim.
How's that a tough question? :confused:
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
13,970
Sorry, but I just can't see how Van Gaal was our "best coach" of the post-Ferguson era. His recruitment of new players was horrifying and he got rid of some decent players. Was it not LVG who declared that his captain shall play no matter how poor his form is? Was it not LVG who imposed tumescent tactics? Was it LVG who was confronted by his own players for disgusting training methods?

Did Van Gaal provide us amusing moments? Of course he did. The simulated dive in front of the fourth official was a classic, possibly watched on YouTube a century from now by some historian researching the sudden downfall of United after the Ferguson era, a downfall to which Van Gaal contributed.

His tactics are what did us in more than anything else. Yes, the goal is lifting trophies...but at what cost to the game itself? His tactics were hideous and for that reason alone, and there are others, Van Gaal should never be mentioned as a "best" of anything in the context of Manchester United.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,152
Those Van Gaal days were bizarre.
Wiped out the squad including anyone who played wide, then moaned we didn't have enough wide players.
Said Rooney would always play.
Tried to fit in Van Persie, Rooney and Falcao into the same line-up.
Bought Di Maria, then tried to mess with his position.
Made out he was a champion of youth, when in reality he was forced to by injuries and wiping out the squad numbers.
Barely ever scored in the first half.

Pros - we controlled games in a way we probably haven't since him .
Battered City and Tottenham in an incredible 5 game purple patch.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,152
Sorry, but I just can't see how Van Gaal was our "best coach" of the post-Ferguson era. His recruitment of new players was horrifying and he got rid of some decent players. Was it not LVG who declared that his captain shall play no matter how poor his form is? Was it not LVG who imposed tumescent tactics? Was it LVG who was confronted by his own players for disgusting training methods?

Did Van Gaal provide us amusing moments? Of course he did. The simulated dive in front of the fourth official was a classic, possibly watched on YouTube a century from now by some historian researching the sudden downfall of United after the Ferguson era, a downfall to which Van Gaal contributed.

His tactics are what did us in more than anything else. Yes, the goal is lifting trophies...but at what cost to the game itself? His tactics were hideous and for that reason alone, and there are others, Van Gaal should never be mentioned as a "best" of anything in the context of Manchester United.
Dreadful days with a few highlights. But mostly false dawns, from the big name signings who flopped, including himself. Yesterday's manager.
It's taken us until now with Ten Hag to get a guy on the up.
 

Van Piorsing

Lost his light sabre
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
22,540
Location
Polska
Some of his methods were bizarre, he thought he can induce total control SAF had, but Manchester United proved it's a different dynamic past 2013. Winning FA Cup is always a positive sign no matter what and definitely helped Mourinho ride that wave with bigger effect for a bit.

He was in the wrong place despite his intentions and efforts. Blatant mistakes like signing Darmian will always be taxing on his vast football history.
 

Black Alabaster

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 29, 2022
Messages
123
The simulated dive in front of the fourth official was a classic, possibly watched on YouTube a century from now by some historian researching the sudden downfall of United after the Ferguson era, a downfall to which Van Gaal contributed.
:lol:

Pros - we controlled games in a way we probably haven't since him .
Battered City and Tottenham in an incredible 5 game purple patch.
This guy has encapsulated it in a nutshell. It essentially boils down to who post ferguson had us playing the best. Some might prefer the sitting back counter attack style of Mourinhoball and Oleball, others may prefer the more proactive, dutch positional & possession passing game that Van Gaal was a proponent of in his career, which he ultimately failed in fully bringing to fruition here - with many reasonable caveats why it didn't materialise.

I agree it was tumescent at times but he had a vision for how we should dominate matches and it did work at times. Ten Hag's style is not so far flung from this albeit he is the more modern man with a fresh spin on established ideas.

LVG - Possesion
Mourinho - Park the bus counter attack
Ole/Mckenna - counter attack (he did do it v well tbf)
ETH - Possesion with modern pressing principles

So we have come full circle to having a man with a plan, just a better one than LVG had time or the ability to implement.
 

Red Pumpkin

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Messages
320
Supports
Bayern Munchen
Those Van Gaal days were bizarre.
Wiped out the squad including anyone who played wide, then moaned we didn't have enough wide players.
Said Rooney would always play.
Tried to fit in Van Persie, Rooney and Falcao into the same line-up.
Bought Di Maria, then tried to mess with his position.
Made out he was a champion of youth, when in reality he was forced to by injuries and wiping out the squad numbers.
Barely ever scored in the first half.

Pros - we controlled games in a way we probably haven't since him .
Battered City and Tottenham in an incredible 5 game purple patch.
But he is a champion of youth. Tyler Blackett, Paddy McNair, Marcus Rashford and probably 2-3 more that I can't remember got their starts under van Gaal. Players that otherwise would never have got a game. Blackett I'm 100 % sure would have become a National Team player if van Gaal had stayed for 2 more years. Same case as Holger Badstuber who was promoted above experienced pros Lucio, Demichelis and van Buyten. The youths give 120 % when the manager back them like that.
 

sport2793

Full Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
3,170
Location
USA
Some of his methods were bizarre, he thought he can induce total control SAF had, but Manchester United proved it's a different dynamic past 2013. Winning FA Cup is always a positive sign no matter what and definitely helped Mourinho ride that wave with bigger effect for a bit.

He was in the wrong place despite his intentions and efforts. Blatant mistakes like signing Darmian will always be taxing on his vast football history.
To be fair, Darmian was fairly highly regarded prior to signing for us, but ya that signing didn't work out.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,152
But he is a champion of youth. Tyler Blackett, Paddy McNair, Marcus Rashford and probably 2-3 more that I can't remember got their starts under van Gaal. Players that otherwise would never have got a game. Blackett I'm 100 % sure would have become a National Team player if van Gaal had stayed for 2 more years. Same case as Holger Badstuber who was promoted above experienced pros Lucio, Demichelis and van Buyten. The youths give 120 % when the manager back them like that.
Blackett, McNair and Borthwich-Jackson should never have been close to action except for first round of league cup type fare. They got near it because Van Gaal stripped the squad down to minimum levels, then got caught out.

Same up front. He didn't see something in Rashford and boost him forward, he was simply caught out by Rooney then Martial being injured. The fact Rashford took his chance doesn't mean it was planned at all.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,152
To be fair, Darmian was fairly highly regarded prior to signing for us, but ya that signing didn't work out.
Not in the media he wasn't.
The week he signed a journalist was saying did anyone really think he'd be starting for us in 2 years.
Spot on - he wasn't.

I don't think Darmian managed more than a handful of games for us in which he played 90mins and didn't get booked. Breath takingly average.
 

LouieVanGallsRedArmeh

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 5, 2022
Messages
68
Definitely the best manager post SAF, without a shadow of a doubt. Or how would SAF have said, no doubt about that.
 

pogbasformerbarber

Full Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2022
Messages
446
Agree with many on here that, while I thought he was a decent game day manager, his secondary management was terrible. Recruitment of players was bizarre, his man management was non-existent, and he always had an extra heaping of blame for everyone other than him. I have no regrets...
 

Dion

Full Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,338
Made out he was a champion of youth, when in reality he was forced to by injuries and wiping out the squad numbers.
Sorry, but this bit is silly. LvG was boring as hell, but he clearly shipped out loads of senior players to give youth players a chance. That was the entire idea and it's part of why he's always been a "champion of youth".

He didn't need to know Rashford was going to be great to create an environment where young players are naturally going to get chances to prove themselves.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,152
Sorry, but this bit is silly. LvG was boring as hell, but he clearly shipped out loads of senior players to give youth players a chance. That was the entire idea and it's part of why he's always been a "champion of youth".

He didn't need to know Rashford was going to be great to create an environment where young players are naturally going to get chances to prove themselves.
Are you trying to suggest he shipped players out to bring in the likes of McNair, Blackett and Borthwich Jackson?
Or that Rashford getting a look in was pure luck due to injuries?
 

Dion

Full Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,338
Are you trying to suggest he shipped players out to bring in the likes of McNair, Blackett and Borthwich Jackson?
Or that Rashford getting a look in was pure luck due to injuries?
I'm suggesting that if you believe that if you give youth players a chance that enough of them will surprise you to make it worth it, then cutting down the squad isn't some massive misstep that was covered over by luck, it's a strategic choice to put faith in the youth system. LvG also clearly believed he could instruct youth players to play the way he wanted them too better than he could more talented older players, so it was even less of a gamble from his point of view. LvG undoubtedly cut down the squad as much as he did to give chances to youth players, he said as much at the time. I don't suppose he thought they would all come good enough for United, but he thought enough of them might be to make the overall gamble worth it.

Personally I think he overdid it, but that was a choice he made, he didn't luck into Rashford, he deliberately engineered a situation where youth players were going to get a chance (at the immediate short term detriment of the club imo).
 

Red Pumpkin

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Messages
320
Supports
Bayern Munchen
Blackett, McNair and Borthwich-Jackson should never have been close to action except for first round of league cup type fare. They got near it because Van Gaal stripped the squad down to minimum levels, then got caught out.

Same up front. He didn't see something in Rashford and boost him forward, he was simply caught out by Rooney then Martial being injured. The fact Rashford took his chance doesn't mean it was planned at all.
I disagree. Another manager would have thrust a winger or midfielder up front. Can't remember who he had available but Nani, Depay, Valencia, di Maria, Cleverley or someone like that. And also another manager would have benched the youth when the senior player got back. Van Gaal gives opportunities to youth. No other manager would have promoted Muller over Luca Toni. Badstuber over Lucio. Van Gaal said no to Neuer because he believed in Thomas Kraft. And it's been the same in every team he has managed.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
119,975
Location
Dublin, Ireland
But he is a champion of youth. Tyler Blackett, Paddy McNair, Marcus Rashford and probably 2-3 more that I can't remember got their starts under van Gaal. Players that otherwise would never have got a game. Blackett I'm 100 % sure would have become a National Team player if van Gaal had stayed for 2 more years. Same case as Holger Badstuber who was promoted above experienced pros Lucio, Demichelis and van Buyten. The youths give 120 % when the manager back them like that.
Blackett wasn’t destined for too much longer at United after the Leicester defeat
Rashford got his break, and kudos to him for taking it because there was a list of about 4 others in front of him who were injured
 

Tom Van Persie

No relation
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
24,540
I'm convinced he had no idea what he was doing half the time and was just throwing random youngsters into the team like Donald Love hoping it would work. Also, does anyone remember him bringing Nick Powell on when we needed a goal in the CL? What the feck was that about. He had never played Powell before iirc and then he's coming on for Juan Mata when we desperately need a goal. Clueless. :lol:
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,271
There are vert few times in my life where I stopped organising my social time around United games. A good part of Van Gaals reign was one of them
 

Van Piorsing

Lost his light sabre
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
22,540
Location
Polska
To be fair, Darmian was fairly highly regarded prior to signing for us, but ya that signing didn't work out.
He represented some quality in Italy, indeed, first matches in United shirt were fairly decent... same with Di Maria & Rojo. Similar promise offered Schneiderlin who's profile was looking quite compatible with the league.

Even Martial & Blind, players who many will remember fondly, there were and are serious doubts if they're more miss than hit. Pure chaos from Van Gaal in that regard.