Nick 0208 Ldn
News 24
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2004
- Messages
- 23,721
And in his opinion they are:
Wayne Rooney
Ashley Cole
Joe Hart
Steven Gerrard
John Terry
Wayne Rooney
Ashley Cole
Joe Hart
Steven Gerrard
John Terry
perhapsAnd IN his opinion they were:
Wayne Rooney yes
Ashley Cole yes
Joe Hart not quiet there yet
Steven Gerrard his swan song really. Debatable.
John Terry
Pretty much. Gerrard is having a nice run for England now but that doesn't mean he's becoming a world class player again.Hart isn't yet, Terry and Gerrard aren't any more.
The first 3 are imo.And in his opinion they are:
Wayne Rooney
Ashley Cole
Joe Hart
Steven Gerrard
John Terry
I agreeHart isn't yet, Terry and Gerrard aren't any more.
THe problem with English football these days is that not everyone thinks Ashley Cole is world class based on him being quite good once upon a time?If you ever asked yourself what the problem with English football is these days, just look at statements like that
Cole isn't even one of the the two best currently performing LBs at the Euros.If the criteria is being in the 22 from planet Earth to face Mars, I'd say only Cole has a decent chance of making the cut. I'm not sure I'd even take Rooney. (Although he's a better player than Cole, there's a lack of good LB's while strikers and playmakers are everywhere).
I'm firmly in the "Cole is overrated"-camp, noodles.THe problem with English football these days is that not everyone thinks Ashley Cole is world class based on him being quite good once upon a time?
Such as?Cole isn't near the quality of other LB's around the world, there are much better players in his position.
Cole has barely put a foot wrong in the tounament to be fair
But obviously Coentrao has stood out as best LB so far
I would disagree.There are much better players than Cole in his position.
I always consider Lahm to be an RB, but yes he has been outstanding tooCoentrao's been very good. Lahm's been even better (again).
Cole's been quite average. He was causing England a lot of problems with his positioning against Ukraine. Young had to spend a lot of time covering for him while he did nothing of note to compensate.
Me too, and also Marcello for me is the best. I think he is brilliant.Lahm, Marcello, then if you want to compare in this tournament, I'd say Coentrao (And I think he's going to be much better anyway). I know I'll probably get slated for saying Marcello, but I prefer him. Maybe I don't rate Cole as high, and that's just me, but I'd have a player like Lahm all day over Cole.
I actually thought Young was caught napping while Husiev pushed high up the pitch from RB, the first couple of minutes. Then England adjusted.Coentrao's been very good. Lahm's been even better (again).
Cole's been quite average. He was causing England a lot of problems with his positioning against Ukraine. Young had to spend a lot of time covering for him while he did nothing of note to compensate.
That's fair, he is, but I still think that for those who are better than him, they are considerably so. Still, Cole will still probably be considered the best LB in the world, 150 years after his death.Me too, and also Marcello for me is the best. I think he is brilliant.
But I would still consider Cole to be up there with the best in the world.
Well if you bring 4-5 strikers in a squad of 23 who would you pickBut okay, ignoring Cole, my point was still that I'm not entirely sure that England would have any of those five in the 22 to face Mars.
Not even Rooney would be safe if that's the criteria.