R.N7
Such tagline. Wow!
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2007
- Messages
- 35,690
- Supports
- a wife, three kids and Eboue
He has been in the past though, like against Greece in Euros.Gomez is the nr. 1 striker atm but Gomez is injured, so it's not really Löws fault.
He has been in the past though, like against Greece in Euros.Gomez is the nr. 1 striker atm but Gomez is injured, so it's not really Löws fault.
I think that Switzerland will qualify while for the second spot will fight Slovenia, Albania and both Scandinavian teams. Cyprus IMO has no chance.Jesus Christ. WCQ is already over for Norway.
Maybe he thought the game was over?Why did Terry leave the field? Subs are used up, right?
Getting ready for the celebrations, I guess.Why did Terry leave the field? Subs are used up, right?
What's the second team?I think that Switzerland will qualify while for the second spot will fight Slovenia, Albania and both Scandinavian teams. Cyprus IMO has no chance.
He needs to get back to London for a paralympic medal ceremony?Why did Terry leave the field? Subs are used up, right?
Norway and Iceland are both Scandinavian right? I know that Iceland is an island, but still qualifies as Scandinavian state. At least I think so.What's the second team?
It's a Nordic country, not ScandinavianNorway and Iceland are both Scandinavian right? I know that Iceland is an island, but still qualifies as Scandinavian state. At least I think so.
Because in the eyes of the Norwegian FA, he's the only one to have success. That was of course in the 90's, and football has changed a lot since then, while his philosophy hasn't changed at all. But once a hero, always a hero, aye?Why is Drillo still managing Norway? You'd think Norway would want to try and be more forward thinking after years of failure.
First of all Drillo is brilliant, it's the quality of our players that is the problem. Secondly we tried a decade without Drillo, and that was worse.Why is Drillo still managing Norway? You'd think Norway would want to try and be more forward thinking after years of failure.
A thousand times thisFirst of all Drillo is brilliant, it's the quality of our players that is the problem. Secondly we tried a decade without Drillo, and that was worse.
For us you are all Vikings anyway.It's a Nordic country, not Scandinavian
The Icelandic are the proper vikings, Norwegians are the almost-vikings, Swedes, Danish and Finnish are non-vikings.For us you are all Vikings anyway.
I'm not sure that's an accurate representation of the football Norway played. First of all they were terrible and thus failed at everything they attempted to do, secondly the emphasis on throw-ins and set pieces/corners gives off an impression of long ball football. Furthermore I'm not sure Norway have good enough players to play nice football at the moment, but we have some decent youngsters coming up. In 3-4-5 years' time Norway will/should appear quite differently. Norway should obviously not have lost this game, they were up against a poorer side overall but fecked up in both ends of the pitch, so well deserved three points to Iceland.Why are Norway still playing that horrible long ball tactic? The players look capable of much more than that.
btw Take that you noggie bastards!
It's very common in English to refer to the Nordic countries as Scandinavia, possibly because "the Nordic countries" is a shit name. It's just Norden to us.Sorry for mistake. I guess I didn't know the difference between Scandinavian and Nordic countries.
Case in point: The main producers of "Scandinavian design" are Sweden and Finland.It's very common in English to refer to the Nordic countries as Scandinavia, possibly because "the Nordic countries" is a shit name. It's just Norden to us.
Fair enough. We were lucky and Norway was shit. I can accept that.The Icelandic are the proper vikings, Norwegians are the almost-vikings, Swedes, Danish and Finnish are non-vikings.I'm not sure that's an accurate representation of the football Norway played. First of all they were terrible and thus failed at everything they attempted to do, secondly the emphasis on throw-ins and set pieces/corners gives off an impression of long ball football. Furthermore I'm not sure Norway have good enough players to play nice football at the moment, but we have some decent youngsters coming up. In 3-4-5 years' time Norway will/should appear quite differently. Norway should obviously not have lost this game, they were up against a poorer side overall but fecked up in both ends of the pitch, so well deserved three points to Iceland.
Exactly what I was thinking about, I have this whatever Thule glass stuff which is meant to be Scandinavian design... from Finland.Case in point: The main producers of "Scandinavian design" are Sweden and Finland.
Thule is also an old word for Iceland. It's an Icelandic beer as well.Exactly what I was thinking about, I have this whatever Thule glass stuff which is meant to be Scandinavian design... from Finland.
We are doing reasonably well against Colombia. 1-0 down to a very early Falcao goal, but pretty even since. It's boiling hot though, the 4th official fainted and has been taken to the changing rooms, our sky blue shirts looked Chelsea blue by the 20th minute...
Second half may be more one-sided Would be delighted to nick one and draw it.