So the 3-5-2

Crashoutcassius

Full Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2013
Messages
10,336
Location
playa del carmen
I don't mind the little mistakes so much. At least those times we're trying to move the ball. Complete lack of centre midfield is just bizarre again. Powell and Anderson obviously shocking. Shouldn't be too hard to just get the ball to the #10 quickly, but it is
 

Kill 'em all

Pastor of Muppets
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
10,546
Our defenders get lost with the ball at their feet, the minimum requirement you need for any possession based system is defenders who are comfortable with the ball and we don't have that.
 

Count Orduck

Full Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
7,092
It's a joke, and the fact that after three games LvG still hasn't realised that is worrying indeed.
 

HabeasC

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Messages
3,600
On paper we should have 5 people defending, in reality the wing-backs are stuck in between wingers and fullbacks in purgatory.

It means we have three defenders and no wingers. Too often you see a CB go wide to tackle with the Wingbacks miles away. That leaves only one person in the middle. No wonder there are so many gaps in the middle. It doesn't help that the defenders are just jogging back after the umpteenth time they have been turned.

This has to stop now. Hopefully with Di Maria we will play 433/4231 from now on.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,546
We're only 3 games and and I already hate this tactic, it doesn't suit us one bit.
 

Rykker_4united

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
3,734
Location
Canada
Supports
Keep Rodgers at Pool.
He thinks this is the ideal formation for us and its probably the farthest from it.
 

Spielmacher

Full Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
3,554
Location
Austria
There is no combination play at all in this. I will get depressed if we stay at the 3-4-1-2 with Di Maria in the side.
 

Zoo

Full Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
29,968
I don't mind, 433 or 442 and one of it's variants. Just as long as we go back to a regular back 4.
 

Ramshock

CAF Pilib De Brún Translator
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
45,425
Location
Swimming against a tide of idiots and spoofers
If confidence is an issue within the playing squad, and it is, then playing this system does not help. I dont think the level of patience exists for this 3 month adjustment period that LvG talks about. Hopefully with Di Maria in we will change to 433
 

Rykker_4united

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
3,734
Location
Canada
Supports
Keep Rodgers at Pool.
Ideal for now or forever? Surely its a temporary thing until he sorts the squad out.
It forces us to play only 2 midfielders when we need more bodies there. It forces us to play wing backs which we are severely lacking in right now. It forces us to play 3 centre halves, all who are charlatans.
 

Yorkeontop

meonbottom
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Messages
6,870
Location
Inside Fred the Red
It forces us to play only 2 midfielders when we need more bodies there. It forces us to play wing backs which we are severely lacking in right now. It forces us to play 3 centre halves, all who are charlatans.
I keep hearing his prefered formation is 433 and he's on playing 352 because of our squad.
 

Parma Dewol

Full Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
1,637
3-5-2 is a really clever system, and LvG has used it to good effect in the past, but it relies so heavily on quality players. We're making shocking decisions on the pitch at the moment, and some of the errors in defence are incredible - they would be costly in any system.

LvG seems to think that good players should be able to play anywhere on the pitch and do a decent job. He's quickly learning that many of our players aren't good enough to do what he wants.

We desperately need one or two utility players who can play in any position. An O'Shea or a Blind could be really useful in this system.
 

Red Phoenix Rising

New Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2014
Messages
488
Location
Warriewood, Sydney.
On paper we should have 5 people defending, in reality the wing-backs are stuck in between wingers and fullbacks in purgatory.

It means we have three defenders and no wingers. Too often you see a CB go wide to tackle with the Wingbacks miles away. That leaves only one person in the middle. No wonder there are so many gaps in the middle. It doesn't help that the defenders are just jogging back after the umpteenth time they have been turned.

This has to stop now. Hopefully with Di Maria we will play 433/4231 from now on.
This is why I asked a few pages back - I don't get how this formation works with these players. Those two wingbacks literally have to do the bulk of the defending and also have to be up supporting the attack. It leaves the back three vulnerable if these players aren't good enough to do that and I don't understand why he is keeping up with it. I think all three goals have come from a bad pass from one of the back three or wingbacks where there is way to much space and are given a full half against the defence to counter.

I just don't get it, if I am honest.
 

OnlyTwoDaSilvas

Gullible
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
21,745
Location
The Mathews Bridge
4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1.

Van Gaal believes it helps shore up a weak defence, and whilst our defence isn't the best, there are worse defences in the Premier League who don't resort to it. Surely we don't need it against the fecking MK Dons?! Ironically, it makes the defence weaker, because nobody knows what they are doing.

When we have the ball, it feels like we are playing with 10 men, as the man in possession nearly always has one less man infront of him to pass to than he would have if we played 4 at the back with attacking full backs. We constantly look at a disadvantage with every attack.

Wing play is non existent. Wingers and full backs are at their most effective when there is an overlap. No overlap. No wing play. Just passes backwards. Bad passes backwards.

The back 3 is a mess. Kids like Keane and Virmijl are still learning how to play football, and are being thrown into a completely foreign system. To be fair, Blackett has taken to it fairly well, but it's still unrealistic to expect youngsters to adapt to it on a night like this, in a game where the opposition were going to play the game of their life, and be on United from the off. Just about all of our centre backs will have played their entire lives in a back 4 up until now. I just don't see it working. I really hope Di Maria is the missing piece which drives Van Gaal towards 4-3-3.
 

bishblaize

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
4,280
4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1.

Van Gaal believes it helps shore up a weak defence, and whilst our defence isn't the best, there are worse defences in the Premier League who don't resort to it. Surely we don't need it against the fecking MK Dons?! Ironically, it makes the defence weaker, because nobody knows what they are doing.

When we have the ball, it feels like we are playing with 10 men, as the man in possession nearly always has one less man infront of him to pass to than he would have if we played 4 at the back with attacking full backs. We constantly look at a disadvantage with every attack.

Wing play is non existent. Wingers and full backs are at their most effective when there is an overlap. No overlap. No wing play. Just passes backwards. Bad passes backwards.

The back 3 is a mess. Kids like Keane and Virmijl are still learning how to play football, and are being thrown into a completely foreign system. To be fair, Blackett has taken to it fairly well, but it's still unrealistic to expect youngsters to adapt to it on a night like this, in a game where the opposition were going to play the game of their life, and be on United from the off. Just about all of our centre backs will have played their entire lives in a back 4 up until now. I just don't see it working. I really hope Di Maria is the missing piece which drives Van Gaal towards 4-3-3.
To be honest though mate, we saw dozens of performances last season that fitted your description of how badly we're playing, all with a back 4.

It might well be true that given our low confidence we should play it safe and stick with what we know. But I dont believe a back four is a panacea and if we started playing 4-3-3 or whatever I suspect we'd see the same problems played out.
 

Ash_G

Full Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
7,402
To be honest though mate, we saw dozens of performances last season that fitted your description of how badly we're playing, all with a back 4.

It might well be true that given our low confidence we should play it safe and stick with what we know. But I dont believe a back four is a panacea and if we started playing 4-3-3 or whatever I suspect we'd see the same problems played out.
Maybe but I don't think it would be quite so bad. Firstly I think this would be more certainty defensively and I think offensively we might do better with overlapping fullbacks. At the moment our poor passing from defence/midfield is being made even worse because with the wingbacks we can't even stretch the game now because they either don't suit playing in 1v1 situations or are so knackered, either way they can't create space for a cross and most the time play the ball infield.
 

JSMHE

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2014
Messages
1,410
So far in my opinion this formation will need to take time. The back 3 or 5 need time to settle in. Play 3 in the back will just make it harder to communicate, the other two centre backs are stretched out too often. The wing backs need to be really quality for delivering service to attackers.
 

itso 7

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,840
Location
harare,zimbabwe
This formation is easy to pick apart because you can push up and suffocate the back three with literally no risk on the counter, almost all the goals we ceonceded were from a poor pass enduced by the pressing. I hope it's the last we see of this damned formation because by the time our players learn it the season would have passed us by.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,430
Location
...
Never supported this rubbish idea. Weakens us at the back and weakens us at the front.

We need wide men and one of Rooney / Mata on the bench.
 

KiD MoYeS

Good Craig got his c'nuppins
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
33,113
Location
Love is Blind
I dunno yet if the 3-5-2 is the issue. Do we really believe it'd have been much better tonight with a 4-3-3 or 4-4-2? I doubt it.

van Gaal probably won't knee-jerk react and change from the 3-5-2, suppose we have to be patient.
 

saivet

Full Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
25,593
If we'd been 'unlucky', creating but wasting chances and giving away few chances then regardless of the results I would be fine. However it's been dire. Leaking chances like crazy and creating feck all.
 

ottosec

Full Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
6,550
People keep talking about the system, but every one of their goals was because of a misplaced simple pass around our box. You can play with 12 men, if you can't do simple things like passing you will always lose.
 

Name Changed

weso26
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
27,395
Location
Dublin
In relation to this system, I was listening to Jonathan Wilson earlier on the Off the Ball podcast (well worth listening to). He said that Louis Van Gaal only took up this system when Strootman got injured playing for Holland and he felt he had to change his system as a result.

When did Strootman get injured? March?

How can this be called a philosophy if Van Gaal has only been playing it for a few months? About 10 games?

I don't mind the idea of the system. But we haven't got the players to play that system and personally I'd find it hard to believe in a philosophy that Van Gaal only made up a few months ago.
 

Name Changed

weso26
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
27,395
Location
Dublin
People keep talking about the system, but every one of their goals was because of a misplaced simple pass around our box. You can play with 12 men, if you can't do simple things like passing you will always lose.
Playing out with the ball and having confidence to is essential in the system also. That is what the players were trying to do when they lost the ball. They were individual mistakes but maybe they happened because of what the players are expected to do now.
 

The Law of Denis

Full Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
6,107
Location
Europa.
When Van Gaal was brought here, part of the reason everyone was excited was because he would have the "bollocks" to drop one of RVP/Rooney and go one upfront.

This would improve our attack as it did when Fergie made this decision long a go. The 3-5-2 and trying to shoe horn in our best players seems like a bit of a cop out.

I'm not convinced that the growing pains of the system will match outweigh the its eventual results when we can immediately switch ti a 4-3-3 which the players are more suited to.
 

DeMono

New Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
813
3 of the 4 goals were because of defensive erros. This was down to the plays not fitting the system, simple as that.