Who played the best attacking football - Moyes, LVG or Mourinho?

GuyfromAustria

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
568
I was curious, so I looked up how many times we've scored 5 goals (or more) in a game since SAF left...the list isn't very long:
27.11.2013 - Leverkusen (a) - 5:0
25.02.2016 - Midtjylland (h) - 5:2

(Not saying you have to score 5+ goals to be playing attacking football, just a thought that crossed my mind.)
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Maybe it's about time threads like these are culled without remorse.
 

King Eric 7

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2014
Messages
5,656
Imagine us playing against a team managed by LVG now. The whole stadium would go into a coma.
 

Bobski

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2017
Messages
9,965
Moyes played the most memorable "attacking" football, that 82 cross Fulham game will never leave me, you could do nothing but laugh.
 

Kajus

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
795
Mourinho.

Van Gaal didn't really play attacking football. What the Moyes team did I do not know, but that certainly wasn't football.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,100
Van Gaal was the most attacking but he had completely the wrong idea of how to implement it. Ended up being the worst attacking football of the lot.

The other two are just more defensive by nature.
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,840
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
I think I am in a minority of one but I actually quite liked LVGs football. I could see what he was trying to achieve and I think given the right players in the right positions it might have worked. Certainly our results and performances against the top teams where fantastic

I do realise it was horrendously dull at times, believe me I sat in the East Stand throughout that season and didn't see a goal go in at my end for ten games!
 

Dundrummer

Guest
We actually played like a proper United side under Moyes maybe half the time, which makes sense because it was the exact same squad that had scored 175 goals in the two prior league seasons. There were a couple dozen games where we scored 2, 3, or 4 goals and generally looked like a proper team, which obviously gives lie to the endlessly repeated suggestion that it was a 'crap squad.' That side could play great football when the manager allowed them to.

We're kinda the same now, except the other half of the time we usually get 0-0 draws or ground out narrow 1-0s, instead of getting beaten by every half-decent team that comes to Old Trafford.

The less said about LVG's approach to football and player recruitment the better.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,396
Location
Birmingham
Like picking between AIDS, Ebola and the Black death.
 

Canagel

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
13,888
This thread is not completely pointless like some people think it it's. At the very least there can be a debate because all 3 managers have never shown attacking football and in terms of unwatachability I still feel the same. None of them have played attacking football to be able to make that comparison.
 

El Jefe

Full Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
4,923
The best period of football post Fergie came under LVG during that 3 match run vs Spurs, Liverpool and City. We also played very well in the loss to Chelsea at Stamford bridge shortly after that where Jose parked the bus at home n got a 1-0 win.

In saying that, the rest of LVG's tenure was filled with pathetically boring football. Jose has been the best of the worst as I feel we've played good football in more games than we did under the other two managers.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,638
Location
London
Best spell was under LVG when we destroyed City, Liverpool and Spurs. Over the course of entire season, this season was the best, followed by last season and Moyes season (in pair), followed by LVG who invented the cure for insomnia.

In term of results, it is obviously Mourinho, followed by LVG and a distant third in Moyes.
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,291
I was curious, so I looked up how many times we've scored 5 goals (or more) in a game since SAF left...the list isn't very long:
27.11.2013 - Leverkusen (a) - 5:0
25.02.2016 - Midtjylland (h) - 5:2

(Not saying you have to score 5+ goals to be playing attacking football, just a thought that crossed my mind.)
In Fergie's four final seasons, all of them post-Ronaldo, we hit 5 or more a total of 12 times: 3 times in 09/10, 3 times in 10/11, 5 times in 11/12 and once in 12/13 (the WBA game).
 

Andersons Dietician

Full Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
13,244
Technical quality then i’d Probably say LVG. When it actually clicked it was pretty awesome there were some pretty impressive cut throat moves put together.
Jose’s attacking is less technical and more individualistic, probably more of it but I don’t think i’d say it was better.
 

arthurka

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
18,741
Location
Rectum
Best and attacking are not words to relate with Utd under any of those managers ..
 

groovyalbert

it's a mute point
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
9,696
Location
London
The first 5 months of this season seem to be entirely forgotten by some fans.
First 5?? First 2 maybe. It's been largely unmemorable/inconsistent since then until now.

Not that this is a concrete marker, but since the end of September we've managed to score more than 3 goals in a single league game twice. We managed the same feat in the opening two games of the season. I was discussing this last night in the De Gea thread, but we started the season in very good physical condition, hence why we were able to take teams apart so effectively in the latter parts of games. Once the rest of the league caught up with our fitness levels, we started to struggle on a more regular basis.

Our poor form/style can also be attributed to our mentality, however. The manner in which we approached the game away at Liverpool gave confidence to a lot of our opponents. The result was good, but our lack of attacking incentive there almost certainly gave teams the confidence to attack us more. It's almost certainly part of the reason we lost the following game away to Huddersfield.

In terms of style, Mourinho has the capacity to play the best of the three, but clearly opts against doing this at times. I think this is what I find frustrating. If he didn't have the precedent/components to attack more regularly and for prolonged periods in the game, you could understand his "pragmatic" stance more. But we do, and we should be expecting a more fluid style of football given our players/club ethos.

LVG started off by playing fairly attacking football, but that away game to Leicester played a huge role in convincing him to approach things differently. If he'd had the confidence to write that game off as a fluke, I think there's a good chance he would have been around for longer. Moyes is irrelevant in this discussion. The only good football we played under him was due to the players at his disposal/remanence from Fergie's time here.
 

Andersons Dietician

Full Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
13,244
but we started the season in very good physical condition, hence why we were able to take teams apart so effectively in the latter parts of games. Once the rest of the league caught up with our fitness levels, we started to struggle on a more regular basis.
That’s actually a really good point that i’d not considered, with the super cup and all we were further advanced than the rest of the league.
 

broccoli

Full Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
3,124
Supports
FCPorto
Van Gaal was the most attacking but he had completely the wrong idea of how to implement it. Ended up being the worst attacking football of the lot.

The other two are just more defensive by nature.
Not really. LVG is the more defensive of the 3. Jose and even Moyes have had an element of risk in the passing and movements. LVG just passed it in the back while players did very controlled movements. It's a very risk averse strategy, hence defensive.
 

JK-27

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
869
We average 2 goals a game this season, Mourinho clearly plays more attacking football. It just doesn't look like attacking football.
 

Oldyella

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
5,856
Things have been bad since probably around Christmas time, but they havent been that bad!
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,100
Not really. LVG is the more defensive of the 3. Jose and even Moyes have had an element of risk in the passing and movements. LVG just passed it in the back while players did very controlled movements. It's a very risk averse strategy, hence defensive.
I agree that Van Gaal ended up playing the worst attacking football of the lot. But I disagree that was because of his intent.

I just think he was a poor coach who didn't have the right idea of how to do it. His system was more rigid because he was a control freak like Guardiola - it was just that his actual ideas were very wrong and completely outdated unlike Guardiola. But the man spent an entire season playing Daley Blind at CB because of his passing, our full backs were further up the pitch, our wingers were asked to do less defensively. Generally we were the ones playing the (shite) football rather than watching the other play against us.
 

Dundrummer

Guest
In Fergie's four final seasons, all of them post-Ronaldo, we hit 5 or more a total of 12 times: 3 times in 09/10, 3 times in 10/11, 5 times in 11/12 and once in 12/13 (the WBA game).
Going by goals per game, 2011/12 and 2012/13 were the 5th and 7th highest scoring sides in Manchester United's top flight history. It'd be fair to say we've fallen a long old way. Especially when you consider:

Agreed. The football under Van Gaal was, in terms of attack, the worst I've seen United play, ever.
We scored 49 goals in the league his last season. How anyone has anything positive to say about him staggers me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sultan

AgentP

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
4,957
Location
Chennai
Jose by a mile. But we are still a long way off from playing attractive football.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,541
Another thread where the poster just wanted his take on criticising Jose.

It's a laughable suggestion to even say it's close to LvG.
 

Loony BoB

Full Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
1,356
Location
Edinbugger
Yeah, it's easy to make things look bad when you put the 0 goal games next to each other:

Mourinho, last season
Feyenord 0-1
Liverpool 0-0
Chelsea 0-4
Burnley 0-0
Hull 0-0
Chelsea 0-1
West Brom 0-0
City 0-0
Arsenal 0-2
Southampton 0-0

Mourinho, this season
Liverpool 0-0
Chelsea 0-1
Basel 0-1
Southampton 0-0
Tottenham 0-2
Newcastle 0-1
Sevilla 0-0
West Brom 0-1
Brighton 0-1

EDIT: Just saw the above post, consecutive games first half I'm pretty confident I couldn't get anywhere near that with any other manager for United. xD