I agree with you, and will probably be call deluded. His philosophy very much relies on "the right players in the right positions" as you say. I liked how he knew exactly what he wanted out of a player in each position. This could stifle creativity, but he also needed a couple of highly creative, attacking players who could open up the defenses, which we largely lacked. All his players needed to be technical too, but that was near impossible with our squad. His defensive record was quite impressive though. At least that part of his philosophy was figured out.
LVG was also very much a manager who largely expected other teams to change their tactics to play against his teams, much like Guardiola teams.; Mourinho is the complete opposite. I prefer the former with some flexibility. LVG was proactive, Mourinho is far too reactive. For a club like ours the reactive approach is embarrassing.
I think LVG needed years to properly implement his philosphy with a quite a few transfer windows, and we all ran out of patience - me included. In the long run I do believe we would have been better off, but the short-term was too much to take. Going from LVG to Guardiola would have worked very nicely.