Premier League Gameweek 11

CA1

New Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2012
Messages
1,894
Chelsea without Hazard is quite poor.
How has it taken until November for people on here to work this out? They're the closest thing to a 1 man team I've seen for a while.

Worst Chelsea team we've played at the Bridge for years the other week.
 

Catt

Ole's at the wheel!
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
27,898
Location
Norway
How has it taken until November for people on there to work this out? They're the closest thing to a 1 man team I've seen for a while.
Many people have said that though.
 

CA1

New Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2012
Messages
1,894
Many people have said that though.
Media have gone big with it.

Making out they were dreadful under Conte. They won the league ffs, one of the best Chelsea teams under him at one point, they were impossible to score against.

There's definitley a media bias towards managers that are thought to play attacking football.

They don't play much different to how they were under Conte, I stand by it. It's pretty much the same players.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,642
Averaging 3 goals a game now (33 in 11) and outscoring their opponent by 2.64 goals a game, on average. They're so far ahead of everyone else. The table will reflect that soon enough in actual points.
Guardiola's mastered the art of beating the bottom half teams, if they keep it up they might end up with a similar points tally to last season. Still, much rather them win it than Liverpool.
 

FootballHQ

Full Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
18,285
Supports
Aston Villa
Chelsea simply don't score enough goals for their dominance in games. Will be top 4 but will be some way off the leaders I think.

And as I post that Morata continues his recent goal spree.:lol:
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
Morata starting to score. Expect the Lukaku-Morata thread to be bumped soon.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
Every time I watch Palace I’m reminded how terrible Wayne Hennessy is.

He must play well sometimes? He must.
 

breakout67

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
9,050
Supports
Man City
How has it taken until November for people on here to work this out? They're the closest thing to a 1 man team I've seen for a while.

Worst Chelsea team we've played at the Bridge for years the other week.
Because this forum gets off on wanking other managers. Arsenal have been utter tosh in multiple games this season getting bailed out by their forwards, yet this forum would have you believe Emery has worked some coaching magic.

Crystal Palace and Watford peppered Arsenal's goal and opened them up at will. They have horrible finishing and then Arsenal has a 10 minute period where their forward scores a goal or two from an unlikely situation and they win.

Arsenal are worse going forward than us, they create less and the quality of chances they create is worse.
 

Pete Dahh Sneak

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 24, 2017
Messages
348
Supports
Chelsea
Media have gone big with it.

Making out they were dreadful under Conte. They won the league ffs, one of the best Chelsea teams under him at one point, they were impossible to score against.

There's definitley a media bias towards managers that are thought to play attacking football.

They don't play much different to how they were under Conte, I stand by it. It's pretty much the same players.

You stand by being 100% absolutely wrong then.

The football with Bakayoko, Kante and Fabregas was definitely the same with 5 defenders on the pitch.
 

Walters_19_MuFc

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
29,626
Location
Birmingham
It usually says 50%/75% chance of playing if thats the case so I avoid it, but they had him marked as fit to start so that was a waste.
Ahh ye. Sarri did confirm that he wouldn't play the whole.

“Maybe he will not be ready to play for 90 minutes at the moment, because it was the first training in the last two weeks, but probably he will be able to play for 40, 45 minutes.

Got you an assist, though.
 

SquishyMcSquish

New Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Messages
8,198
Supports
Tottenham
Media have gone big with it.

Making out they were dreadful under Conte. They won the league ffs, one of the best Chelsea teams under him at one point, they were impossible to score against.

There's definitley a media bias towards managers that are thought to play attacking football.

They don't play much different to how they were under Conte, I stand by it. It's pretty much the same players.
Sarri has clearly implemented a different style, I don't know how you think they aren't playing much differently to before.

That said, I do agree they have been overhyped and I don't think they're all that great yet, nor do I think Sarri is doing the best job ever. He has some very good players at the club who were part of a title winning side not long ago, plus Jorginho and Kovacic were bound to improve them. The squad were clearly tired of Conte's methods, so it wasn't as if they were lacking talent .. and even then they weren't far off top four, so it's to be expected that they'd be up there in the top four this season.

He's done well to stamp a new style on them so quickly and they're winning games, a good job all in all. Definitely very reliant on Hazard though.
 

Canagel

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
13,888
Media have gone big with it.

Making out they were dreadful under Conte. They won the league ffs, one of the best Chelsea teams under him at one point, they were impossible to score against.

There's definitley a media bias towards managers that are thought to play attacking football.

They don't play much different to how they were under Conte, I stand by it. It's pretty much the same players.
They are most certainly not the same. Under Conte they were more counter attack.
This season they have the best passing stats in the PL throughout the whole team and much higher possession. There's like four of their players in the top ten for passes. They were playing with bakayoko and drinkwater in the midfield. Now jorginho, kovacic etc. How is it the same? They switch from 3 at the back to 4 at the back. Of course it's different.
 

Pow

New Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
3,516
Location
Somewhere
Supports
Chelsea
Media have gone big with it.

Making out they were dreadful under Conte. They won the league ffs, one of the best Chelsea teams under him at one point, they were impossible to score against.

There's definitley a media bias towards managers that are thought to play attacking football.

They don't play much different to how they were under Conte, I stand by it. It's pretty much the same players.
That line that the football is the same as under conte just shows you dont watch them play in the slightest and are just being bitter. A 2 year old could see the constrast in football between the two sides.
 

E-mal

Full Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
3,747
Kante looks average in this team. Am not sure this type of football is his forte!
 

Walters_19_MuFc

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
29,626
Location
Birmingham
That is hopefully the end of Barkley over Kovacic. Kovavic should be starting.
Why, because they happened to score two when he went off, two of which Kovacic didn't have any involvement in?

Ross came on against us and scored. Got his deserved start against Burnley, scoring 1 and assisting two and started today. Not to mention assisting and scoring one the week before against Southampton.

Barkley has been just as good, if not better than Kovacic so far this season.
 

ROFLUTION

Full Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
7,651
Location
Denmark
Can't believe we're only 4 points off top 4 :lol: It seems our season has been way worse.

I guess we'll be 7 points off next week though.