IAmAWinner
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2016
- Messages
- 1,293
Chelsea without Hazard is quite poor.
How has it taken until November for people on here to work this out? They're the closest thing to a 1 man team I've seen for a while.Chelsea without Hazard is quite poor.
Many people have said that though.How has it taken until November for people on there to work this out? They're the closest thing to a 1 man team I've seen for a while.
Media have gone big with it.Many people have said that though.
Guardiola's mastered the art of beating the bottom half teams, if they keep it up they might end up with a similar points tally to last season. Still, much rather them win it than Liverpool.Averaging 3 goals a game now (33 in 11) and outscoring their opponent by 2.64 goals a game, on average. They're so far ahead of everyone else. The table will reflect that soon enough in actual points.
Because this forum gets off on wanking other managers. Arsenal have been utter tosh in multiple games this season getting bailed out by their forwards, yet this forum would have you believe Emery has worked some coaching magic.How has it taken until November for people on here to work this out? They're the closest thing to a 1 man team I've seen for a while.
Worst Chelsea team we've played at the Bridge for years the other week.
Media have gone big with it.
Making out they were dreadful under Conte. They won the league ffs, one of the best Chelsea teams under him at one point, they were impossible to score against.
There's definitley a media bias towards managers that are thought to play attacking football.
They don't play much different to how they were under Conte, I stand by it. It's pretty much the same players.
Is that the actual number or are you just taking the piss?Today was the 28th time.
Ahh ye. Sarri did confirm that he wouldn't play the whole.It usually says 50%/75% chance of playing if thats the case so I avoid it, but they had him marked as fit to start so that was a waste.
Sarri has clearly implemented a different style, I don't know how you think they aren't playing much differently to before.Media have gone big with it.
Making out they were dreadful under Conte. They won the league ffs, one of the best Chelsea teams under him at one point, they were impossible to score against.
There's definitley a media bias towards managers that are thought to play attacking football.
They don't play much different to how they were under Conte, I stand by it. It's pretty much the same players.
No it's honestly the right number. Crazy stat.Is that the actual number or are you just taking the piss?
Wow if true. I guess I shouldn't be surprised since we've had 3 defensive managers in a row. Still pretty pathetic though.
They are most certainly not the same. Under Conte they were more counter attack.Media have gone big with it.
Making out they were dreadful under Conte. They won the league ffs, one of the best Chelsea teams under him at one point, they were impossible to score against.
There's definitley a media bias towards managers that are thought to play attacking football.
They don't play much different to how they were under Conte, I stand by it. It's pretty much the same players.
That line that the football is the same as under conte just shows you dont watch them play in the slightest and are just being bitter. A 2 year old could see the constrast in football between the two sides.Media have gone big with it.
Making out they were dreadful under Conte. They won the league ffs, one of the best Chelsea teams under him at one point, they were impossible to score against.
There's definitley a media bias towards managers that are thought to play attacking football.
They don't play much different to how they were under Conte, I stand by it. It's pretty much the same players.
Why, because they happened to score two when he went off, two of which Kovacic didn't have any involvement in?That is hopefully the end of Barkley over Kovacic. Kovavic should be starting.
Could have been 2 (and 5 behind 2nd) if it weren't for BarkleyCan't believe we're only 4 points off top 4 It seems our season has been way worse.
I guess we'll be 7 points off next week though.
Not to mention losing/drawing the games we should be winning.Could have been 2 (and 5 behind 2nd) if it weren't for Barkley