Christian Pulisic | Chelsea player

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,290
Wow, I know they don't always get it right but Chelsea always seem to get the players others want to sign. Christ there is a long list.....
 

George Beast

Full Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
976
Seen more disappointment from United fans than from Dortmund fans who've actually been watching him play recently
 

André Dominguez

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
6,382
Location
Lisbon
Supports
Benfica, Académica
He's not worth his price tag yet. Not at his actual career stage. He should stay on loan to Dortmund or another solid club for another season, at least.
 

ROFLUTION

Full Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
7,660
Location
Denmark
Definitely not disappointed. He's simply just not as good as made out to be. Only 20 years though, so plenty of time.

But Dortmund wouldn't be selling this easy neither if they had a superstar on their hands. Tricky one though, as he could still come good. Needs regular gametime though.
 

Beobachter

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
83
Yeah, he really regressed this season and barely made any impact on the much improved Dortmund side. Dortmund can afford to let him go, and probably feels like it's the best time to cash out now that his stock is still high.

Not that it's not a gamble worth taking by Chelsea, mind. From the kid's perspective though, I'm not sure it's the best possible move to optimize his long-term outlook. Doesn't have the consistency required at the top level yet.
 

Borussin

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
304
Supports
Borussia Dortmund
Nice quick business at a good price by Chelsea.

We should go all our for Sancho in the summer. Only problem with that is it would probably spend 100% of our budget to get him.

De Ligt, Sancho and Toby please :drool:
I would say it's nice buisness from Dortmund. He'd only have a year left on his deal at the end of the season, so getting 58m for him is exeptional for a player who struggles to get in the team.

Chelsea are signing potential, but if you have money to burn, then that's cool for them too!

And Pulisic going for 58m, what price on Sancho. He has a longer contract, and is a far superior player.
 

Affirmation

Full Member
Joined
May 29, 2018
Messages
598
I'm so disappointed we didn't sign Christian Pulisic, regardless of what many will claim he is a talented player and other circumstances have kept him out of the Borssia Dortmund team this season. At the moment I would probably prefer signing Jaden Sancho if I had to choose but I just can't see him moving yet so I do think we should of signed Pulisic and gone back in for Sancho at a later date I guess.
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,297
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
The problem is less about Pulisic and more that they won't sell Sancho in the Summer now. Which for Sancho is probably a good thing but annoying for us.
 

fallengt

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
5,604
Seen more disappointment from United fans than from Dortmund fans who've actually been watching him play recently
They're laughing their ass off. 60m is ridiculous for Pulisic who has 1 year left.
Sancho is who we want
 
Last edited:

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
33,044
60m will be nothing extraordinary if he plays to his potential and becomes an American superstar. Chelsea clearly eyeing the American market.
 

SalfordRed18

Netflix and avocado, no chill
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
14,086
Location
Salford
Supports
Ashwood City FC
Ill hold my hands up and say ive not watched him play this season. However in a market where Fred went for £52mil and Lukaku went for £75mil, his potential both on and off the field, to me makes it a good deal.
 

AgentP

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
4,957
Location
Chennai
I have not seen anything from him for us to be worried about. I'm not even sure if he's better than Willian and Pedro.
 

bucky

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
9,599
I am struggling to believe that his contract is ending in the summer and they are paying that much, am I missing something here? Otherwise that's an absolutely ridiculous deal.
 

Borussin

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
304
Supports
Borussia Dortmund
Lewandoski is the only Dortmund player of note to make it elsewhere, will the trend continue, we'll see.
In recent seasons - Dembele now seems to be getting his stuff together at Barcelona, Aubameyang is doing well for Arsenal, Ginter and Sven Bender are both doing very well for Gladbach and Leverkiusen, Gundogan seems to be doing alright at City, Hummels for Bayern, there's been a few ;)

But yes, no guarantee for sure! Same with any transfer when you are buying potential.

I am struggling to believe that his contract is ending in the summer and they are paying that much, am I missing something here? Otherwise that's an absolutely ridiculous deal.
Yes, he would still have had a year left in the summer. It's still a crazy fee though.
 

Acrobat7

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
5,330
Supports
Bayern Munich
I am struggling to believe that his contract is ending in the summer and they are paying that much, am I missing something here? Otherwise that's an absolutely ridiculous deal.
His contract ends 2020.
 

Sphaero

Struggling to explain his genius to the hoi polloi
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
4,620
Location
Potsdam, Germany
Supports
Borussia Dortmund
Seen more disappointment from United fans than from Dortmund fans who've actually been watching him play recently
A player who struggled with form for about a year now (losing his regular starter spot in the process), stagnated in his development despite been given a lot of play time and was clearly not fully commited to the club anymore is leaving the club in the Summer for a sum, from what we could buy at least two players with the potential to improve us.

Not much to be dissapointed about to be honest. We don´t even need an immediate squad replacement for him with the loan part of the deal.

I was going by transfermarkt, but I guess that's not the best source. Thanks for clearing it up.
No, the source is correct, just was very quickly updated ^^
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
52,759
Location
Founder of IhateMakeleles.org and Gourcufffanboysa
The problem is less about Pulisic and more that they won't sell Sancho in the Summer now. Which for Sancho is probably a good thing but annoying for us.
Nah. Its Dortmund. Offer them Mbappe/Dembele money for Sancho and they'll fly him in a private jet to Manchester plus drive him from the airport to the signing table.......
 

Orc

Pretended to be a United fan for two years
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
5,322
Supports
Chelsea
Not bothered about the price. If we were keen enough to pay this and do so almost as soon as the transfer window opened and loan him back to them to sweeten the deal it must mean that there were a number of big clubs who would've been after him in the summer. We had to move now or many other clubs (likely also in the PL) would've been chasing him.

That aside, must say I'm not really excited about this. At least not at the moment. I don't think he's even better than what we have on the right side and neither Willian nor Pedro have been pulling up trees. I seriously cannot imagine the club would be dumb enough to think this lad will replace Hazard.
 

antihenry

CAF GRU Rep
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
7,401
Location
Chelsea FC
Marketing reasons and potential transfer ban aside, that's a lot of money to pay for someone who isn't currently a starter and has season and a half let on his contract. Still, he's only 20 and apparently the club was after him for quite awhile. I hope Sarri turns him into a to player.
 

RoyH1

Full Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
6,025
Location
DKNY
Good piece of business by Dortmund. Yes he has huge marketing potential, and yes Pulisic is good, but he's overrated here in the CAF.

Look to Dortmund using less than half of the money to get another young gem. They are so good at scouting and developing young talent.
 

Borussin

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
304
Supports
Borussia Dortmund
Phew, I am just glad he didn't go to Liverpool.
Chelasea where the only team who made a concrete offer for him. Don't think Liverpool had any need or interest for him now. He'd have the exact same issues there as he has at Dortmund at the moment, with no clear path to the first 11. whereas at Chelsea, with Willian and Pedro both being 30/31, there is a more clear path to the first team there.
 

LilyWhiteSpur

New Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
12,370
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham
I really, really don’t get the hype around this kid. He is fast and skilful but I have seen nothing to suggest he will become a world beater. Bough for marketing purposes, I really don’t see why any kid signs for Chelsea, their record with youth is fecking shocking.
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
16,435
Well of course, we're left twiddling our thumbs while Chelsea sign another future talent. You'll hear he's overrated but he's really not. He's not Sancho or Mbappe admittedly but he's a solid talent and only 20 playing in a position where we are desperately lacking. You'd think Pulisic would be right up the Glazer's street.
 

LilyWhiteSpur

New Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
12,370
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham
Chelasea where the only team who made a concrete offer for him. Don't think Liverpool had any need or interest for him now. He'd have the exact same issues there as he has at Dortmund at the moment, with no clear path to the first 11. whereas at Chelsea, with Willian and Pedro both being 30/31, there is a more clear path to the first team there.
If Chelsea fecked up with Salah, Lukaku, KDB, quite frankly Pulisic has no chance. He is in no way ready for the PL.
 

vodrake

Full Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Messages
3,509
I haven't seen anywhere apart from the caf that considers £58m for pulisic and loaning him back for the rest of the season as a good deal for Chelsea. A lot of chelsea fans on reddit are in meltdown.

He gets massively overhyped on here based on people convincing themselves he would be coming to United for some reason
 

Kostur

海尔的老板
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
28,749
Location
Poland, Kraków
It's a good buy imo, both from football and the marketing perspective, even more baffling we haven't gone for him given Ed's hard-on for business matters.
 

Green_Red

New Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
10,296
I'm not surprised he signed for them, what young player doesn't dream of being the 45th youth player on loan at Chelsea.
 

Orc

Pretended to be a United fan for two years
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
5,322
Supports
Chelsea
If Chelsea fecked up with Salah, Lukaku, KDB, quite frankly Pulisic has no chance. He is in no way ready for the PL.
All three of those players "failed" here under a certain manager who has just been sacked by United. And none of them really failed. They were never given a real chance.
 

LilyWhiteSpur

New Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
12,370
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham
All three of those players "failed" here under a certain manager who has just been sacked by United. And none of them really failed. They were never given a real chance.
Clearly there was a problem with the youth setup at that time if they weren’t developing or being handled properly to put it all on José is a bit of a lazy rebuttal. What chances are youth getting now? Tammy Abrahams on loan again.
 

pascell

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
14,215
Location
Sir Alex Ferguson Stand
It's a strange transfer, they already have Hazard, Pedro and Willian to play on the wings. 60m isn't that bad of a fee when you consider Sterling was bought for 50m before the over inflated market and Pulisic has got the potential to be a very good player and obviously will have great market pulling power. The thing that makes it stranger is that they are willing to sell Hudson-Odoi who could end up just as good potential wise as Pulisic for 40m.
 

Sanche7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
2,796
It's a good buy imo, both from football and the marketing perspective, even more baffling we haven't gone for him given Ed's hard-on for business matters.
Its a good sign if you ask me. Ed could have easily bought him saying hey we need a RW but the fact that the club decided not to do so despite the huge business opportunities the deal presents means that the club are seriously considering a more structured approach to signing players.
Regarding Pulisic, I never felt he was really special the few times I watched him. When you watch Dembele / Mbappe, you get the feeling that they are special, Pulisic looks like someone who does the basics right, but other than that, I don't find him to be special or once on a generation talent and certainly not worth 60 million pounds
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,777
Clearly there was a problem with the youth setup at that time if they weren’t developing or being handled properly to put it all on José is a bit of a lazy rebuttal. What chances are youth getting now?
Salah and KbD were 23/24 when they left Chelsea. They were way past youth stage.

Big feck up though, especially KdB who was superb in Bundesliga when loaned out.