Ole Gunnar Solskjaer | W15 D2 L4

Is Ole a good appointment?


  • Total voters
    2,659

DBT85

Full Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2017
Messages
638
You have been marked for eternity. Your name will be mentioned in whatsapp groups worldwide.

#josearselicker.


Man you get to bit when they say up next is Phelan and it bloody ends! Tease
 

mariachi-19

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
18,617
Location
I may be the devil, but i'm not a monster
The issue now is, if we ultimately get fourth place and continue our upward trend as a team, if he doesn't get the job and results are not equal, does the new manager come under heavy scrutiny and we end up in the same position as under the previous permanent managers.

It would almost be better for a different manager if we stumble towards the end of the season, but if we roar in, finish fourth and get to the semi final of the CL and/or win the FA Cup, I'd say the board is going to have a hard time not picking him full time.

It seems that the players adore him but they also know that there is not a player in the current side that is even close to having as big an impact on Manchester United's history as the boss so the fans will never turn on him (same guise as Zidane at Madrid). I think where Sir Alex was feared because he was the boss, Ole is feared because our fans will look now to the players before they turn on the Manager. With Moyes, LVG and Mourinho it was Club > Players > Manager. With Fergie Club > Manager > Players. I think Ole gets the later treatment.
 

reddaz71

New Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
960
Location
Cheshire
OGS will get the job full time imo, makes too much business sense and keeps the fanbase at arms length,a kind of emotional blackmail,theyre not daft those yanks yer know.
 

Fitchett

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
1,604
Location
Manchester
My heart says give the job to Ole.

My head says let's wait till the end of the season and see how things go. But then in all likelihood give the job to Ole.

I would not set the bar ridiculously high for him to get the job. I would not make it contingent on getting top 4, winning the FA Cup, getting to the SF of the CL or anything like that. I dont know what specific KPIs I would set for him tbh, he just has to do well - not brilliantly, not winning every game, just winning more than not and entertaining.
I agree completely. He is the man for us and I want him to be appointed permanently at the end of the season. He is the perfect fit for United, the low risk option. I can see him lasting 20 years as manager, which is the longetivity the club craved for when Moyes was appointed on a six years contract. I couldn't see Pochettino lasting that long - either we sack him if he flops like the last three did, or he gets his head turned by Real Madrid if he is successful for us.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,657
OGS will get the job full time imo, makes too much business sense and keeps the fanbase at arms length,a kind of emotional blackmail,theyre not daft those yanks yer know.
I see the man has his heart out for United. I imagine, if he later on feels he can’t give more to the club, he’ll resign himself. Just like what Cantona did.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,657
My biggest reservation with Ole, at the moment, is with him referring to Saf nearly all the time. I want him to be his own man. I want him to lay down HIS marker. Talk about what HE brings and the thoughts HE has on the team. Maybe I'm being a little harsh on him. Maybe after the Dubai break, where he has got to spend time with the squad, he may start being his own man.

But so far, so good. There are a lot of question marks, such as player acquisitions etc but that will be on the shoulders of any new DoF.
If it’s a sucessful receipe, why don’t you want to refer it to? I’ll be more than satisfied if we get the exact carbon copy of (younger) Fergie. Which of course, Ole sets the team differently than SAF, but the philosophy is similar.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
At least he is trying to stop Mata going for a walk about the pitch. The MEN says that Ole was noticed trying to get Mata to come back to the right side so the defence can be stretched.
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
If it’s a sucessful receipe, why don’t you want to refer it to? I’ll be more than satisfied if we get the exact carbon copy of (younger) Fergie. Which of course, Ole sets the team differently than SAF, but the philosophy is similar.
It just smacks of the old Lfc mistakes where they tried using the managers who played under their successful managers of Paisley and Shankly. Sometimes you just need a clean break. Yes of course it would be great to if Ole was successful here. It would be really poetic, however, we need to get the next appointment correct. By all accounts, Saf is very heavily involved at the moment. What happens when he’s not there?

Like I say, having Ole manage us would be a dream scenario. We all want him to be our Zidane. However, we need someone a bit more proven. That’s just my opinion. Not right or wrong, just my opinion.
 

Bobcat

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
6,390
Location
Behind the curtains, leering at the neighbors
Regarding Pochettino, a collegue of my who supports Spurs claims the chances of him of joining United are very slim, partly because of respect to Tootenham, but also because Real Madrid are on the prowl for a new manager and right now he seems like the best candidate
 

ReddBalls

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2015
Messages
992
It just smacks of the old Lfc mistakes where they tried using the managers who played under their successful managers of Paisley and Shankly..
What mistakes? That model was extremely successful. Paisley, Fagan and Dalglish were all promoted from within. The only failure of that model were Souness.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DBT85

Full Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2017
Messages
638
It just smacks of the old Lfc mistakes where they tried using the managers who played under their successful managers of Paisley and Shankly. Sometimes you just need a clean break. Yes of course it would be great to if Ole was successful here. It would be really poetic, however, we need to get the next appointment correct. By all accounts, Saf is very heavily involved at the moment. What happens when he’s not there?

Like I say, having Ole manage us would be a dream scenario. We all want him to be our Zidane. However, we need someone a bit more proven. That’s just my opinion. Not right or wrong, just my opinion.
I'd agree with you if we were doing the same as they did but in my opinion we really aren't. We went down a different path that was equally as flawed.

Dalglish was given the job with zero managerial experience at all (and yet was successful). He was player manager after Fagan retired (who never actually wanted the job). Dalglish then quit Keegan style after a 4-4 with Everton despite being 3 points clear at the top of the league. Moran was only a caretaker so I'll ignore him (he also didn't want the job), Souness did well at Rangers but he was also a complete cnut while he was there, Souness pissed off a lot of fans with a Sun interview published on the 3rd anniversary of Hillsborough. Then he sold Saunders who nearly helped Villa win the league while Liverpool sat in the bottom half of the table. Bad signings and losing the fans ended his tenure, so they gave it to Evans, yet another man who had never managed, only been a coach. To be fair to him, he created a good team from the mess he got. I hated facing Fowler and McManaman and the rest of them even if we did come out on top come the end of the year. Then the club tried to get Houlier in as joint manager which ended Evans but finally broke the cycle.

Liverpools mantra was to promote form within to maintain continuity if they felt the right man was there. The only one with any experience in the role was Souness and he might have been the least successful of the lot.

Ole has actually managed, both winning leagues against the odds, and getting relegated. Highs and lows.

If we had appointed Giggs after Moyes went we could easily be on the same set of tracks as Liverpool were, fortunately we didn't, despite the pleas for us to do so.

I also don't buy that SAF is "very heavily involved". Ole bending his ear on how to run the a club that only he has done well, inviting him to training and letting him try and pump up the players once is nothing that shouldn't be happening. SAF won;t be dresing anyone down or criticising anyone (to them anyway), and he doesn't talk about it to the media either.

Ole has been given a free hit. Caretaker for a prolonged period which most never get. Usually it's 10 or less games or so to see out the season. By the end of the season Ole will have managed us for a bare minimum of 25 games. 2 in the FA cup, 2 in the CL and 21 in the league. More if we beat Arsenal (possible imo) or manage to beat PSG (less likely).

No matter how hard we try, there is no guarantee that the next choice will be the right one. Right now probably the only way you could do that would be to abduct Pep which we know will never happen. Every other manager so far has been picked for fairly solid reasons, if flawed. Moyes - long term stability and PL proven with no money to spend, Gaal - international name, can deal with egos, won things (though his best years were a decade behind him), and finally Mou who in terms of winning things is a perfectly logical choice if you accept the baggage that you know comes with it.

None of them wanted to play football how we want to play football. None of them really got United what it means and why its special. Moyes was the only one who had it worked would have stayed more than 3 or 4 years.

What criteria do we set for our new manager? Exciting football? Freedom of expression? Deal with egos? Don't slag players off in public? Understand the club? Has managerial experience? Has won something, anything, somewhere? Absolutely won't get nicked by Madrid?

It's still too early to give him the job as the next 20 games could be a diabolical mess. Come the end of the season, 4th spot or not, CL progression or not, we'll know more about him as potential manager than basically anyone that was ever given the Liverpool job in those days apart from Souness, who, once again, was a complete bellend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Varun

rampo

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
850
Location
India
Hi there! New forum member (lifetime Manchester United fan) chiming in!

I'm Norwegian so my opinion is wildly biased, but nevertheless:

I think Ole would make a fantastic manager for Manchester United. He is the very embodiment of what Manchester United is. A club legend who enjoys the very fact that he gets to have Old Trafford as his workplace.

Some of the key factors for why I personally think Ole is the man for the job (and a couple questionmarks).

1) Ole Gunnar is a low maintenance manager. What I mean by that is that his demeanor makes him extremely comfortable to be around, and his way of leadership does not wear and tear at anyones morale. Unlike Mourinho who favors an agressive leadershipstyle that punishes players by public shaming and repeated benching, Ole runs a "I got your back" type of leadership, where he is the one who is responsible for the hardships, and the players are the ones who gets the credit for the win.

We've seen examples of this in several interviews already, noteably he refuses any credit for Lukakus 0-1 goal vs Newcastle, rather talk about how well Lukaku did. He has adressed the teams issue with set pieces, and not laid blame on any single player. He's also not come across as angry or condescending, but rather adressed a fact in public with a calm rationality that will make the people that works for him more likely to adress their own struggles, and not spend enegry on what mean things the manager said. He mentioned the defense almost letting a newcastle player through with a personal mistake, "but Phil made a great recovery". Again emphasizing the player when he did someting positive, isntead of something negative.

Several times he talks about how well players are doing. Rashford, Martial, Pogba, Shaw, Lukaku, De Gea, etc. etc. Every time they do something noteable, the manager is there to let them know that he notices, and is willing to tell everyone.

Words are cheap, but words also carry a lot of meaning, especially when a key factor in personell management, is personell morale. By his conduct, Ole is a person that is going to naturally want people to make an effort for him. If you want success, this can not be understated.

2) Ole Gunnar has many years of exprience working with young players. Academy players are the very bedrock that Manchester United is founded upon. Its the teams very identity and it must be protected at all costs. Ole is a manager that is known for playing the youngsters, and knows very well the value of a young and fast team. In Norway he's worked with many talents in Molde football club, most recently and noteably he's coached Erling Braut Haaland for Molde, who in turns has been sold and will join Red Bull Salzburg at the age of 18. In 2017 Erling was ranked as one of The Guardians picks for future stars of European football from the 2000 class. He's also worked with other known United players, most noteably of course, Paul Pogba.

His focus on yougsters and getting talent up through the club makes Ole an ideal candidate for the job.

3) Attacking style football. Manchester United is not a defensive team. Its a great attacking team with a great defense. Currently the player personell in the back 4 needs improvement. In my book only Shaw and Lindelöf *currently* holds the required quality for a United defender. If Ole stays, this is what needs adressing.

When he took over Molde, the name of the game was attackminded football, when he took over Cardiff the mantra was the same, up and attack. When he took the job with United, againt he same. United is an attacking team, and this coach wants to score 1-0, 2-0, 3-0, 4-0, 5-0. Never sit on a lead, always pressure. Giving players with incredible offensive talents such as Martial, Rashford and Pogba the freedom to do what they want is a blessing for this team. Some of the plays this trio has pulled out the last 4 games have been a joy to watch.

If you want a manager that wants to score goals? This is one.

4) Ole is a experienced manager. He's currently been in charge of a football club for 8 years (2010 -> to date). In that time he has won the Norwegian league twice, the Norwegian cup once, and pershaps most relevant he has won the Lancashire Senior Cup and Manchester Senior Cup with the Manchester United reserveteam during his tenure as a coach.

Molde actually won their Europa League group ahead of Celtic, Fenerbache and Ajax. They were eventually relegated by Sevilla who beat them 3-1 over 2 matches (Molde beat Sevilla in Spain). Financially, all of these clubs are in another universe compared to Molde.

He also has experience coaching a Premier League club (but we'll get back to that in a moment).

5) After Sir Alex, 3 coaches have tried and failed to make the club great. Some good results have come, but its time to to be a hard factor again. Moyes, LvG and Mourinho all failed in their own ways, but they all failed. Moyes was a coach that was used to building his team slowly and meticilously in Everton, eventually gaining some success. LvG came and went with so so results, and Mourinho, despite winning the European League, almost burned the club to the ground in the process.

You need someone who is respected throughout the organization, by literally everyone. Everyone has a realtionship with this man, and not one of them has a bad word to say. The interim manager time and time again emphasizes hos great this club is, how great the players are, what Manchester Unitd is all about, what responsibilities the players have both to conduct, effort and morale. This is not a manger that wants to shape the club in his own philosophy, he wants to build on one that was started and left off by the greatest manager to ever set foot in a stadium. Its the United way, all the way, and every day.

6) Ole enjoys incredible respect among the players in the club, some of who he has a previous relationship, but others who have obviously warmed up to the idea that anyone else than Mourinho is in charge. You see how different everyone are acting on and off the field through their social media and various interviews. What I'm sure everyone wants to see is a coach that instills the same kind of respect that Sir Alex did. When Ole gives Paul Pogba a big hug after the win vs. Newcastle, that is not for theatrics, these are people that genuinely respect eachother. It's the little things, like the absolute glee among the coaching staff by the bench when the team scores, to Rashford posting a tweet being instructed by Solskjaer. These people are all aboard with this manager right now.

7) Marcus Rashford. It's been 4 games, but oh man has Marcus Rashford been an absolute monster these 4 games. Playing under Ole so far has been a godsend for Marcus. We saw it against Bournemouth when Rashford was charging balls that everyone had given up on, making plays and just using his speed every chance he got. Marcus has been 110% effort under Ole, and its absolutely incredible to watch. Marcus Rashford is goign to be an absolute beast for United in the coming seasons. He's best left with a manager that gives him what he has today.

8) Ole has been vocal about his intent to build this team around him. In fact it was reported that one of the first things Ole did when he came here was have a heart to heart with Pogba, and ask him what HE felt he needed to perform at the level everyone knows he can. Pogba went from being a scapegoat to an absolute monster overnight. This is personell management at its finest.

9) Sanchez. Boy oh boy, Sanchez. The player that came from Arsenal has still not shown up on Old Trafford. This is the perfect time to let Alexis show why he collects Messi money from the Old Trafford cashiers. Salaries aside, the man looked extremely hungry to go against Newcastle, with several hard effort runs, and one sweet pass to Rashford for 2-0. I think that Ole is the man that can finally give Alexis the confidence he needs to succeed at the club. If he does its another argument to keep him around in my eyes.

10) Alex Ferguson. It should be relatively evident that Ole is not here without some very hard input from Sir Alex. Ole refers to him as "The Boss", just like Ronaldo and Beckham does to this day. They have a very strong relationship and Sir Alex is obviously an influence to this day on both Oole and the club. The fact that he's been visiting the training field speaks to a man that is simply going to be the personification of United for the rest of his days, and his protege is currently sitting in his chair.

11) Mauricio Roberto Pochettino Trossero - "Everyones" favorite candidate to mange the club next season.

So what favors Pochettino over Ole exactly?

As players, Ole had the more impressive career, obviously.

They are both coaches that favor an attacking style of play and are known to give young players a chance at greatness in the club. Pochettino struck gold when he promoted Alli, Dier and Harry Kane from the Tottenham programs. There is a 100% chance that Ole is going to go the same route. Its the United way.

Players who have been coached by Pochettino are very favorable of his man management, and his willingness to give players the freedom they need to develop. Sound like someone we know?

Pochettino has never won anything as a manager, technically. But thats hardly a good argument against. His results with Tottenham are absolutely worthy of merit and all accolades.

In my eyes, Pochettino and Ole Gunnar are essentially the same person. The key difference to me is that Ole has the backing of *everyone*. The players, the fans, Sir Alex, and hopefully the board. The Glazer family stockvalue have increased considerably these past 4 games, something not to be underestimated.

So why not go with the man already in the chair?

_____________________

These are some of my pro reasons for keeping Ole on. Anyone wildly disagree?

I do have some "But what about..." points as well just to be fair.

1) Cardiff. Cardiff was an absolute disaster, but moreover it was a disaster of a club to manage. It was a struggling team with a chaotic owner and little resources available to do much of anything. I don't think that a lot of managers could have saved Cardiff from going down to begin with. If anything it was a disaster of a club to choose. The fact that he passed over Aston Villa before choosing Cardiff will forever be a mystery, although both clubs were struggling and were always candidates for relegation. Cardiff is absolutely something to consider when considering Ole for the job. Fortunately we have the good fortune of having half a season to evaluate this interim manager.

2) "Irrelevant experience" as a manager. True that Molde in Norway is a non-factor in a European measurement. But the local teams compete on local metrics, and there Ole was king. It also gives more creedence to the fact that he at least managed to coach a team to a European League group win.
Nice read and well articulated points

I like Ole's style of play but am yet to be convinced on his tactical ability and adaptability. Thankfully we have around 20 matches to gauge that
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,237
Location
La-La-Land
Ahh thanks!

I do wonder if he'll stay on if they give Ole the job.
I wish he would stay on whoever is the next manager. We need 2-3 staff members who know the club and can build bridges, especially in the beginning
 

DBT85

Full Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2017
Messages
638
I wish he would stay on whoever is the next manager. We need 2-3 staff members who know the club and can build bridges, especially in the beginning
So rare to happen these days as a new manager brings his own staff.

The tragic mistake was letting Moyes get rid of everyone when he came in as if Fergie had been sacked. Utter braindead decision from everyone involved.
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
I'd agree with you if we were doing the same as they did but in my opinion we really aren't. We went down a different path that was equally as flawed.

Dalglish was given the job with zero managerial experience at all (and yet was successful). He was player manager after Fagan retired (who never actually wanted the job). Dalglish then quit Keegan style after a 4-4 with Everton despite being 3 points clear at the top of the league. Moran was only a caretaker so I'll ignore him (he also didn't want the job), Souness did well at Rangers but he was also a complete cnut while he was there, Souness pissed off a lot of fans with a Sun interview published on the 3rd anniversary of Hillsborough. Then he sold Saunders who nearly helped Villa win the league while Liverpool sat in the bottom half of the table. Bad signings and losing the fans ended his tenure, so they gave it to Evans, yet another man who had never managed, only been a coach. To be fair to him, he created a good team from the mess he got. I hated facing Fowler and McManaman and the rest of them even if we did come out on top come the end of the year. Then the club tried to get Houlier in as joint manager which ended Evans but finally broke the cycle.

Liverpools mantra was to promote form within to maintain continuity if they felt the right man was there. The only one with any experience in the role was Souness and he might have been the least successful of the lot.

Ole has actually managed, both winning leagues against the odds, and getting relegated. Highs and lows.

If we had appointed Giggs after Moyes went we could easily be on the same set of tracks as Liverpool were, fortunately we didn't, despite the pleas for us to do so.

I also don't buy that SAF is "very heavily involved". Ole bending his ear on how to run the a club that only he has done well, inviting him to training and letting him try and pump up the players once is nothing that shouldn't be happening. SAF won;t be dresing anyone down or criticising anyone (to them anyway), and he doesn't talk about it to the media either.

Ole has been given a free hit. Caretaker for a prolonged period which most never get. Usually it's 10 or less games or so to see out the season. By the end of the season Ole will have managed us for a bare minimum of 25 games. 2 in the FA cup, 2 in the CL and 21 in the league. More if we beat Arsenal (possible imo) or manage to beat PSG (less likely).

No matter how hard we try, there is no guarantee that the next choice will be the right one. Right now probably the only way you could do that would be to abduct Pep which we know will never happen. Every other manager so far has been picked for fairly solid reasons, if flawed. Moyes - long term stability and PL proven with no money to spend, Gaal - international name, can deal with egos, won things (though his best years were a decade behind him), and finally Mou who in terms of winning things is a perfectly logical choice if you accept the baggage that you know comes with it.

None of them wanted to play football how we want to play football. None of them really got United what it means and why its special. Moyes was the only one who had it worked would have stayed more than 3 or 4 years.

What criteria do we set for our new manager? Exciting football? Freedom of expression? Deal with egos? Don't slag players off in public? Understand the club? Has managerial experience? Has won something, anything, somewhere? Absolutely won't get nicked by Madrid?

It's still too early to give him the job as the next 20 games could be a diabolical mess. Come the end of the season, 4th spot or not, CL progression or not, we'll know more about him as potential manager than basically anyone that was ever given the Liverpool job in those days apart from Souness, who, once again, was a complete bellend.
Cannot dispute anything you’ve written there. Agree with it all. My stance is, we really need to get this next appointment right. Obviously every appointment has it’s risk but we have to try and mitigate the risks.

Like you say, the remaining games will be a major factor but Ole was never considered for the full time job before being caretaker. We all know the likes of Saf and Ed want Pochettino. We should not let the heart sway the boards decision. If we can get Poch, we have to go and get him. If we can’t, Ole has a great chance.
 

PeteManic

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2012
Messages
2,152
He will 100% get the job.

No.1 He was chosen by Ferguson.
No.2 The fans are onboard and seduced by the whole situation
No.3 They are playing the United way again
No.4 Ole gives a good interview
No.5 Who says Pochettino (or anyone else for that matter) would actually want the job and the scrutiny anyway? 3 managers have failed so far. The odds on you being the one to change it all are not good.
 

DBT85

Full Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2017
Messages
638
Cannot dispute anything you’ve written there. Agree with it all. My stance is, we really need to get this next appointment right. Obviously every appointment has it’s risk but we have to try and mitigate the risks.

Like you say, the remaining games will be a major factor but Ole was never considered for the full time job before being caretaker. We all know the likes of Saf and Ed want Pochettino. We should not let the heart sway the boards decision. If we can get Poch, we have to go and get him. If we can’t, Ole has a great chance.
My main concern with Poch is that Madrid will nick him and we'll be left holding our balls again.

We also don't really know to be fair whether Ole was thought to be in contention for the job full time. They felt he was good enough for 25 games so it's not nothing.
 

RG 11

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2009
Messages
872
It's the first time since SAF that I'm looking forward to the next United game desperately. Even in Mourinho's second season I wasn't particularly dying to see us play because he was always so gloomy.

It's a priceless feeling and which is the reason why I started watching football in the first place. I hope he does well and gets a shot at it next season if we come within a couple of points of top 4.
 

ReddBalls

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2015
Messages
992
Moran, Souness & Roy Evans
Point is the model wasn't flawed, which is what you implied. It's impossible to choose the right manager every time over a period of time. Every club appoints duds as manager now and then. Liverpool abandoned their model of promoting from within after Souness. Would you say that model worked better for them?
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
It is too early to say but he is on the right path. There is a positivity about the club. We may or not make the 4th place but if there is good progress I hope he gets it. He is not going to promote himself and it is not about himself as Jose and others did. As others have said, if he feels it is not working he is going to walk away. He loves United too much to wait to get the sack and the cheque.
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
Point is the model wasn't flawed, which is what you implied. It's impossible to choose the right manager every time over a period of time. Every club appoints duds as manager now and then. Liverpool abandoned their model of promoting from within after Souness. Would you say that model worked better for them?
Very difficult question to answer. Because even if we look at our own records, Jimmy Murphy & McGuinness never worked either. Ultimately, it comes down to the person in charge.

Like I said in another post, there's nothing to suggest that Ole wouldn't work here. However, we have to make a decision with our brains and not hearts. The best indication of who will get the job will be when/if we sign our DoF/Sporting Director.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,421
Location
Birmingham
He is a manager with 250 games behind him. Wish the press will stop talking about him like some clown that's been brought to OT to smile at everyone.
Barnes was taking the piss in the post match analysis against Newcastle.
 

Ace of Spades

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
5,249
He is a manager with 250 games behind him. Wish the press will stop talking about him like some clown that's been brought to OT to smile at everyone.
Barnes was taking the piss in the post match analysis against Newcastle.
Probably the thing that pisses me off the most, give him due credit ffs. Stop with the narrative that all he has to do is smile to get good results, as if that has ever worked before.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,421
Location
Birmingham
Probably the thing that pisses me off the most, give him due credit ffs. Stop with the narrative that all he has to do is smile to get good results, as if that has ever worked before.
I also wish MUTV would stop pushing the "atmosphere" around the club angle. Focus on his tactical changes a little bit. You feel the media make it seem like he's just told the players to express themselves and do whatever they want.
 

Ace of Spades

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
5,249
I also wish MUTV would stop pushing the "atmosphere" around the club angle. Focus on his tactical changes a little bit. You feel the media make it seem like he's just told the players to express themselves and do whatever they want.
Exactly, he has clearly made changes to tactics and playing style. The positioning of the players, the off the ball tactics and on the ball tactics changed greatly as well, but hey, all he does is smile and all the changes is done by the players themselves apparently.
 

RedDevil@84

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
21,782
Location
USA
I also wish MUTV would stop pushing the "atmosphere" around the club angle. Focus on his tactical changes a little bit. You feel the media make it seem like he's just told the players to express themselves and do whatever they want.
Do the MUTV pundits ever discuss tactics? They have a boring thing called box to box or something like that on MUTV. Many times it feels like someone sitting and commentating on highlights reel.
 

Eric7C

New Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
993
Exactly, he has clearly made changes to tactics and playing style. The positioning of the players, the off the ball tactics and on the ball tactics changed greatly as well, but hey, all he does is smile and all the changes is done by the players themselves apparently.
He has done all of that, but I also think his own interviews are fueling the impression that all he does is to tell the players to go and express themselves. He has refused to take any credit for Rashford's markedly better finishing for example. One hopes of course that behind the scenes the club knows all the work that goes into it and actually does consider him for the position full time.
 

Alex99

Rehab's Pete Doherty
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
16,049
To be fair, we've not been tested tactically yet, so it's a bit premature to be talking up his tactics.
 

ArjenIsM3

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
5,645
Location
Netherlands
To be fair, we've not been tested tactically yet, so it's a bit premature to be talking up his tactics.
Bit of a strange thing to say. Every game is a test. Mourinho's tactics often failed against the lower teams and against the top teams his tactic was to park the bus and pray for a miracle. It's not like tactics only come into play against the top 4.. :confused:
 

Alex99

Rehab's Pete Doherty
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
16,049
Bit of a strange thing to say. Every game is a test. Mourinho's tactics often failed against the lower teams and against the top teams his tactic was to park the bus and pray for a miracle. It's not like tactics only come into play against the top 4.. :confused:
You know what I mean. You're expected to beat the lower teams regardless, but tactics play much more of a role in the games against the better sides, and can be a real difference maker