Random Task
WW Lynchpin
DDG
Mctominay
Lukaku
Who knows, we may just pull it off.
You're the only one who's moaning actually.The negativity surrounding this game is pathetic. So what if we have a shite chance of progressing, doesn't mean we cant enjoy the game. Were playing the French equivalent of City, with a depleted squad, in a tournament that we were never expected to win anyway. Just have a beer, cheer the team on, enjoy the game and then move on to facing Arsenal in a game that actually matters. Stop the moaning
It will be a difficult game. If we sit deep, they will just pass the ball around, knowing they have a 2-0 lead and we are the ones who need to be proactive. And they can keep the ball for long periods. If we attack them and press them, we leave too much space for their quick players for counter attacks and 1vs1, and also Mbappe. With our team being so young and inexperienced in the CL, i am not really positive, i just hope we dont get spanked and come away with no injuries.We need to sit deep, soak up the pressure and hit them on the counter - a typical Jose Mourinho performance. A little cowardly, granted, but nonetheless effective. I cannot see any other way of getting a positive result.Young Smalling Lindelof ShawDDG
Dalot Fred Periera RashfordMctominay
Lukaku
Who knows, we may just pull it off.
I don't see him going with a back 3De GeaMartial is probably still out. This team just chooses itself.
Bailly Smalling Lindelof
Dalot Pereira McTominay Fred Shaw
Lukaku Rashford
And with a 4-3-3 without Pogba we won't score enough. We need goals. 4-4-2 with a counter attack is the only way that's going to happenYou want to deploy in a flat 442 against one of the strongest midfield setups in Europe?
They will absolutely steamroll us.
We need to score 3 goals to win. So offense wins this one, not defense. A 1-0 win is no good to us...Our only chance of winning this is good defence. With good defence, we can score a lucky goal, and then it's a game of nerves. But we won't have good defence with 2 midfielders, impossible - so we need at least three. Hence Fred starts (and he has a birthday today, so another reason to start him tomorrow)
2 goals are perfectly enough if we don't concedeWe need to score 3 goals to win. So offense wins this one, not defense. A 1-0 win is no good to us...
Right on.The negativity surrounding this game is pathetic. So what if we have a shite chance of progressing, doesn't mean we cant enjoy the game. Were playing the French equivalent of City, with a depleted squad, in a tournament that we were never expected to win anyway. Just have a beer, cheer the team on, enjoy the game and then move on to facing Arsenal in a game that actually matters. Stop the moaning
That's pretty much exactly how I feel, and most people I've spoken to about it feel the same way.It will be a difficult game. If we sit deep, they will just pass the ball around, knowing they have a 2-0 lead and we are the ones who need to be proactive. And they can keep the ball for long periods. If we attack them and press them, we leave too much space for their quick players for counter attacks and 1vs1, and also Mbappe. With our team being so young and inexperienced in the CL, i am not really positive, i just hope we dont get spanked and come away with no injuries.
I'd rather not get a pasting personally, the best Pereira has looked was when we played him as a #10 for starters so him in behind the 2 strikers and then Dalot attacking as a wingback in my system is not defensive, we have attacking outlets in mine but we also offer some protection for our very inexperienced midfield.We might be huge underdogs going into this one, but why would we set up in a defensive line up when we need to score 3 goals? I'm not ready to roll over despite 10 first team players being unavailable for this one. For me, the only possible line up is an attacking one, and without Pogba, even a 3 man midfield is too defensive. So it's a 4-4-2 for me...
-----------------------De Gea--------------------
Dalot--------Smalling-------Lindeloff------Shaw
Young------McTominay---Perriera-------Chong
-----------Lukaku---------Rashford-------------
Subs: Romero, Bailley, Fred, Gomes, Greenwood, Garner and ??? I think this is all that we have available. So short one sub. So it would have to be another reserve player...
Mctominay with the most united caps of all the mids.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
It's not negativity, people are just being realistic, they are better than us to begin with, they have 2 away goals and we are missing half of our main starters. I'm personally looking forward to the game as I think we'll put in a decent performance and have a go, but I don't expect anything but a defeat realistically.The negativity surrounding this game is pathetic. So what if we have a shite chance of progressing, doesn't mean we cant enjoy the game. Were playing the French equivalent of City, with a depleted squad, in a tournament that we were never expected to win anyway. Just have a beer, cheer the team on, enjoy the game and then move on to facing Arsenal in a game that actually matters. Stop the moaning
I wouldn't call extra time and penalties "perfect".2 goals are perfectly enough if we don't concede
2 goals are good enough to take it to penalties. And I highly doubt we won't concende even if we play a defensive line up. Personally, I think we will need to score at least 3 if not more to advance2 goals are perfectly enough if we don't concede
24.1. 22.7 for the outfield players.Average age of the squad?
Call it a 3-5-2 if you like, but it is a 5-3-2 and nobody can ever convince me that it's anything but a defensive line up. The only way a 3-5-2 is actually a 3-5-2 is if it's with one central defender and 2 full backs. We need to score goals. Having less players in and around their 18 isn't the way to do it. If Pogba was available I would be all for a 4-3-3. Without Pogba I think our best chance of scoring goals is with traditional wingers whipping in crosses to 2 strikers. So for me a 4-4-2 is the way to go. Call me old school, but this is my opinion and you are more than welcome to disagree with me...I'd rather not get a pasting personally, the best Pereira has looked was when we played him as a #10 for starters so him in behind the 2 strikers and then Dalot attacking as a wingback in my system is not defensive, we have attacking outlets in mine but we also offer some protection for our very inexperienced midfield.
Being 2-0 down, having the second leg away and without 10 first team members, I dare say penalties are absolutely perfect.I wouldn't call extra time and penalties "perfect".
3-5-2 is only defensive if your wingback's play deep, going to one of the best teams in Europe with has-been winger and a kid as the two flank options is suicide, at the very least in the system you're suggesting I'd play Dalot as the RW and Pereira on the LW, but I don't see Ole playing 4-4-2 and risk the young team getting humiliated.Call it a 3-5-2 if you like, but it is a 5-3-2 and nobody can ever convince me that it's anything but a defensive line up. The only way a 3-5-2 is actually a 3-5-2 is if it's with one central defender and 2 full backs. We need to score goals. Having less players in and around their 18 isn't the way to do it. If Pogba was available I would be all for a 4-3-3. Without Pogba I think our best chance of scoring goals is with traditional wingers whipping in crosses to 2 strikers. So for me a 4-4-2 is the way to go. Call me old school, but this is my opinion and you are more than welcome to disagree with me...
But then we'll have scored 3.Being 2-0 down, having the second leg away and without 10 first team members, I dare say penalties are absolutely perfect.
Besides, if it goes to extra time, then we can exchange goals during the extra time and still go through
I'm going with what we have and how I would do things. I know that Ole will go with either a 4-3-3 or 4-4-2 diamond though. However, i have always preferred a traditional 4-4-2 and that hasn't changed. And like I said, try as you might, but nobody can convince me that a 5-3-2 (call it a 3-5-2 all you want) isn't a defensive line up, because it is. Call them wings backs all you want, but they are full backs. Whether it's Young, Dalot or Shaw, their style of play doesn't change whether it's a 5-3-2, 4-4-2 or 4-3-3. Full backs attack. The difference is, in a 4 man defense that leaves 2 guys in the back when we are attacking and more players in and around their 18, but when it's 5 in the back it leaves 3 defenders in the back when we are attacking and one less player in and around their 18....3-5-2 is only defensive if your wingback's play deep, going to one of the best teams in Europe with has-been winger and a kid as the two flank options is suicide, at the very least in the system you're suggesting I'd play Dalot as the RW and Pereira on the LW, but I don't see Ole playing 4-4-2 and risk the young team getting humiliated.
Not really because in a lot of systems with a traditional back there's a holding midfielder that drops in to make a back 3 anyway when the fullbacks bomb on. No formation is inherently defensive or offensive, the personnel and managers intructions dictate how the formation is used, for instance 4-4-2 is seen as ultra attacking but Atleti play it as a defensive based formation.I'm going with what we have and how I would do things. I know that Ole will go with either a 4-3-3 or 4-4-2 diamond though. However, i have always preferred a traditional 4-4-2 and that hasn't changed. And like I said, try as you might, but nobody can convince me that a 5-3-2 (call it a 3-5-2 all you want) isn't a defensive line up, because it is. Call them wings backs all you want, but they are full backs. Whether it's Young, Dalot or Shaw, their style of play doesn't change whether it's a 5-3-2, 4-4-2 or 4-3-3. Full backs attack. The difference is, in a 4 man defense that leaves 2 guys in the back when we are attacking and more players in and around their 18, but when it's 5 in the back it leaves 3 defenders in the back when we are attacking and one less player in and around their 18....
That's pretty much exactly how I feel, and most people I've spoken to about it feel the same way.
A midfield consisting of Fred, Periera and Mctominay just isn't good enough to give PSG a game. Sad but true.
You are probably right, but god I HOPE you're wrong! 1-0 at half time and we are right in this!That's pretty much exactly how I feel, and most people I've spoken to about it feel the same way.
A midfield consisting of Fred, Periera and Mctominay just isn't good enough to give PSG a game. Sad but true.
Think you'll find that I was addressing something rather than moaning about itYou're the only one who's moaning actually.
QuotedWe beat them 3-1 or 3-0 and I will do whatever you guys want.
Oh dear...We beat them 3-1 or 3-0 and I will do whatever you guys want.
That's a post from someone that doesn't spend time in the general.Quoted
I AM the generalThat's a post from someone that doesn't spend time in the general.
You're a glutton for punishment!We beat them 3-1 or 3-0 and I will do whatever you guys want.
But she isn't, that was my point.I AM the general
Yeah, I’ve just watched too much Entourage latelyBut she isn't, that was my point.
Within reason of courseOh dear...
Don't know what to believe anymore, you seem so changed.We beat them 3-1 or 3-0 and I will do whatever you guys want.
Damir Skomina