PL D FA Premier League

Sheffield United 3:3 Manchester United

Post-match discussion


Sun, 24 November 2019

fps

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
5,543
I can guaranteed, when we went 3-2 up, we’re all saying go for four, but also saying we could get caught on the counter with that shocking midfield.

Any manager would have done the same, even the nightly Klopp and Pep.

It didn’t work out this time.
Not at all, especially with a team which has repeatedly given away leads and points by losing momentum with defensive substitutions late in matches over the past few YEARS.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,435
I have to wonder if it was us who scored the first and third goals, would they have been allowed ? You'd think VAR would get rid of the old small club leniency that refs tend to have, but it doesn't. So in fact it just makes it worse that you sit and watch thinking VAR will pick that up.......and it lets it go because it's still down to the opinion of a person with emotion and agenda.

Third goal touches the arm. It's simple.
 

Paxi

Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,678
Should just close Redcafé despite the makeover - it's embarrassing.
Most posters on this thread are lower than dog turds.
I'll probably pick up a warning for this post when a lot of you fukkers on here should just be banned
You're free to find another forum.
 

jderbyshire

Has anybody seen my fleshlight?
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
4,189
To be fair to Ole, if he hadn't have made that sub, and we conceded, some people would've accused him of being naiive/not seeing the game out.
 

fps

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
5,543
Anyone with common knowledge of human anatomy that has played football once in his life could be absolutely certain that that was a hand ball.

Sure, it touched his pectoralis and his deltoid muscle, but the only way he brought it down on his right foot volley is because he controlled it with his biceps.

You can't control a football with your shoulder. You sure as hell can't bring it down on your volley.

So the answer is simple. They could have been certain, and they should have been.

But they failed.

Why?

Well now, that is the question of the VAR itself.

Human error. Only digitalized and slowed down. But still prone to errors.
I have both those things in the first line. It wasn't handball at all, that was obvious, you can play the ball with your shoulder and he obviously did. You're just a blinkered fan.
 

Inigo Montoya

Leave Wayne Rooney alone!!
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
38,543
I have to wonder if it was us who scored the first and third goals, would they have been allowed ? You'd think VAR would get rid of the old small club leniency that refs tend to have, but it doesn't. So in fact it just makes it worse that you sit and watch thinking VAR will pick that up.......and it lets it go because it's still down to the opinion of a person with emotion and agenda.

Third goal touches the arm. It's simple.
It was. If they’re being consistent, then that should be disallowed
You know if one of our defenders does that, a pen would have been given
 

Reiver

Full Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2016
Messages
2,563
Location
Near Glasgow
We were unlucky as 2 of the goals could have been ruled out. And we played about 10 minutes or so of good football.
None of that should detract from 70 minutes of truly awful football. Ole has been in charge a year and we've not progressed in any positive way.
 

lysglimt

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
15,337
Regardless what People think of OGS - it scares me that we have "fans" that almost seem happy that SU equalized against us.
 

Random Task

WW Lynchpin
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
34,503
Location
Chester
Anyone with common knowledge of human anatomy that has played football once in his life could be absolutely certain that that was a hand ball.

Sure, it touched his pectoralis and his deltoid muscle, but the only way he brought it down on his right foot volley is because he controlled it with his biceps.

You can't control a football with your shoulder. You sure as hell can't bring it down on your volley.

So the answer is simple. They could have been certain, and they should have been.

But they failed.

Why?

Well now, that is the question of the VAR itself.

Human error. Only digitalized and slowed down. But still prone to errors.
You've based your argument on an assumption rather than fact. That's not an acceptable basis for which to overturn a game-changing decision.

The video replay did not, in any way shape or form, show the ball striking the arm of the goal scorer. Thus the goal should stand.
 

SteveW

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Messages
7,194
That's what everybody is saying. Momentum was lost the moment we decided to see the game out. Ole said that sometimes it is beyond the tactics and yet he made a shit tactical decision. If he just let the game go on I'm convinced we'd have scored 4th goal as they collapsed.
You don't need a 424 formation to keep pushing. We still had 3 forwards on the pitch.
 

Shimo

Full Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
8,082
Decisions are only right if they work.
Don't agree here. In football you can make the right decisions but, it's football and things happen. If you sub on someone for an injured or tiring player the sub makes mistake for a goal, does it make it the wrong decision? Not really.

In this case, we got to 3-2 because he made the right decisions starting the 2nd half. Their second goal was a mistake and a well taken goal but, we started to take the game to them. They started to sit back and once we got our first, we went for it, taking the risk of being hit on the counter but, we were able to quickly capitalize on getting the 2nd from that gamble and the 3rd.

Once we got our 3rd though, Sheffield were not going to sit back, they were going to attack, so we had to shore up midfield. It's was the right decision and it's one that is made 10/10 by any manager because we were still had a lot of threat on the pitch but, with some balance to see the game out. The 3rd goal is a result of us actually still gambling too much giving space on the left, James has to cover a lot of ground and rushes in and player goes by him, letting him get the ball into the box.
 

SteveW

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Messages
7,194
Rashford gets it, it's blinking obvious, if you're an attacking threat the other team can't simply pour forward.
You think we need to have 4 forwards on the pitch to be an attacking threat? 424 formation is our only way to score a goal. We had 3 pacey talent forwards on the pitch after the substitution.

They just didn't see it out due to a lack of experience more than anything.
 

SteveW

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Messages
7,194
Don't agree here. In football you can make the right decisions but, it's football and things happen. If you sub on someone for an injured or tiring player the sub makes mistake for a goal, does it make it the wrong decision? Not really.

In this case, we got to 3-2 because he made the right decisions starting the 2nd half. Their second goal was a mistake and a well taken goal but, we started to take the game to them. They started to sit back and once we got our first, we went for it, taking the risk of being hit on the counter but, we were able to quickly capitalize on getting the 2nd from that gamble and the 3rd.

Once we got our 3rd though, Sheffield were not going to sit back, they were going to attack, so we had to shore up midfield. It's was the right decision and it's one that is made 10/10 by any manager because we were still had a lot of threat on the pitch but, with some balance to see the game out. The 3rd goal is a result of us actually still gambling too much giving space on the left, James has to cover a lot of ground and rushes in and player goes by him, letting him get the ball into the box.
Nice to see there's some common sense left on here. At no stage did we retreat and we still had 3 forwards on the pitch.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
101,461
Location
Barrow In Furness
Our nonexistent midfield and some questionable coaching decisions.
Everybody has been saying for last few years that the defence got overworked because they got no protection from the midfield. So what do we go and do weaken the options even more. Then we get reports that Ole says we are scouting midfielders, then we might not sign anybody in January but look at the loan market. I am not sure if this club knows if it is coming or going.
 

TsuWave

Full Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
14,334
Terrible performance. Only time the team looked good was when they abandoned what Ole had been working on all week. As soon as we got the lead and went back to what Ole had been working on, Sheffield equalised.

Get Ole out of here please.
 

simplyared

Full Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2017
Messages
4,409
Location
somewhere ouside the UK
Easy with hindsight but he should never have subbed Martial. They opened up when we went ahead and we could have got another goal and killed it. But no he brings in another defender and they go at us. Rubbish tactics! And how the feck could he keep Fred on the pitch for 90 mins.
 

Gordon S

Full Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
3,697
We really missed Scott out there today, feels like he is tailormade for these kind of games. Pereira is a below average cm and can't even remotely replace him.
 

Paxi

Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,678
I dont want to claim to have any knowledge of what was or wasnt going on. I did however see this picture at half time. So I doubt they were celebrating
If that was at before we scored then fair enough but I still don't see anything nefarious in that picture.
 

Fanatic 00237

Full Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2015
Messages
1,111
Location
Bight of Biafra, Earth, Milky Way
Supports
The Indomitable Lions
They’re a recently promoted club, you cant be serious.
They're a newly promoted team whose total wages probably cost less than Rashford and De Gea combined.
We’re Manchester United for Christ’s sake! We should have the best coaches in the world.

The excuses for Ole are getting more and more ridiculous. He’s been in the job nearly a year now, the excuses need to stop!
What does being recently or newly promoted have to do with anything? They have a head coach who has been at the job for more than three full seasons and a stable squad of experienced players. They certainly look better coached but you can’t analyse that as if we were in a vacuum.

Context is always key when moaning or when praising a team. Their total wages may be less but they are vastly more experienced. Wages don’t win you leagues nor does the club name. LCFC had a much lower total wage bill yet they won the league ahead of all the other big name clubs.

Just for reminders, these are their results against the usual top 4/top 6 contenders:

Chelsea A 2-2
Liverpool H 0-1
Arsenal H 1-0
Tottenham A 1-1
United H 3-3

How does that look for a newly promoted side?
 

GaryLifo

Liverpool's Secret Weapon.
Joined
Feb 26, 2001
Messages
10,815
Location
From here to there
That match day thread was an embarrassment. People hoping we’d concede more to get Ole sacked. Support the team and the manager, until he’s no longer the manager.
Spoiled bastards. Take the rough with the smooth.

Was it good enough? No it wasn’t. But feck me some people need to have a word
This
 

Cantona in disguise

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Messages
722
If that was at before we scored then fair enough but I still don't see anything nefarious in that picture.
No I agree just seen a lot of posters claiming they were celebrating. However the picture has a time stamp of 5.21and I saw it at half time. Which would tally up. Just clearing that part up not that it really matters. Just bugged me
 

fps

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
5,543
You think we need to have 4 forwards on the pitch to be an attacking threat? 424 formation is our only way to score a goal. We had 3 pacey talent forwards on the pitch after the substitution.

They just didn't see it out due to a lack of experience more than anything.
No, I didn't say that. It was clear the team had finally clicked, everything was working, there was no need to disrupt that.
 

dev1l

Full Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
9,598
Rashford gets it, it's blinking obvious, if you're an attacking threat the other team can't simply pour forward.
That doesn't apply when the opposition is losing and desperately needs a goal 10 mins from time.
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,434
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
Terrible performance. Only time the team looked good was when they abandoned what Ole had been working on all week. As soon as we got the lead and went back to what Ole had been working on, Sheffield equalised.

Get Ole out of here please.
You were there on the training ground, were you?

Bizarre take
 

Paxi

Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,678
No I agree just seen a lot of posters claiming they were celebrating. However the picture has a time stamp of 5.21and I saw it at half time. Which would tally up. Just clearing that part up not that it really matters. Just bugged me
Fair enough man.
 

Ace of Spades

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
5,249
Very poor first half, better second half. Disappointed that we did not get the win, but would have taken a draw before the game. Starting Jones was a poor decision, but bringing Axel was fine, should have held on at the end.

Hopefully Pogba is back atleast, would be some good news. Should get some minutes in the Europa league game and get back sharpness.
 

Player Ratings

5.0 Total Average Rating

Highest Rated Player

Lowest Rated Player

Compiled from 314 ratings.

Score Predictions

323,68,103
  • Man Utd win
  • Sheffield Utd win
  • Draw

Detailed Results

  • 23% Sheffield Utd 1:2 Man Utd
  • 17% Sheffield Utd 0:2 Man Utd
  • 16% Sheffield Utd 1:1 Man Utd
  • 7% Sheffield Utd 0:1 Man Utd
  • 6% Sheffield Utd 1:3 Man Utd
  • 6% Sheffield Utd 0:3 Man Utd
  • 5% Sheffield Utd 1:0 Man Utd
  • 5% Sheffield Utd 2:1 Man Utd
  • 3% Sheffield Utd 0:0 Man Utd
  • 3% Sheffield Utd 2:0 Man Utd
  • 2% Sheffield Utd 0:5 Man Utd
  • 2% Sheffield Utd 2:2 Man Utd
  • 1% Sheffield Utd 1:4 Man Utd
  • 1% Sheffield Utd 2:3 Man Utd
  • 1% Sheffield Utd 0:4 Man Utd
  • 0% Sheffield Utd 5:0 Man Utd
  • 0% Sheffield Utd 2:4 Man Utd
  • 0% Sheffield Utd 3:2 Man Utd
  • 0% Sheffield Utd 5:5 Man Utd
  • 0% Sheffield Utd 3:0 Man Utd
  • 0% Sheffield Utd 1:5 Man Utd
  • 0% Sheffield Utd 3:1 Man Utd
Compiled from 494 predictions.
Show more results Score Predictions League Table

Match Stats

  1. Sheffield Utd
  2. Man Utd
Possession
41% 59%
Shots
12 11
Shots on Target
8 5
Corners
6 3
Fouls
13 10

Referee

Andre Marriner