Hugh Jass
Shave Dass
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2016
- Messages
- 11,303
This is basically saying Martial is not good enough.
How muchAt a reported £300,000-a-week, he must be!
He was playing in Sweden at the time wasn't he?At least that was Henrik fecking Larson, not Ighalo ffs.
Think it's more, well if Martial get's injured, we'll have an option other than a young inexperience Greenwood.This is basically saying Martial is not good enough.
That would be a successful loan spell.Looking at his stats, if he played 20 games for us, all competitions, before the end of the season, I'd expect half a dozen goals from him.
No it doesn’t!This is basically saying Martial is not good enough.
Yep that's exactly what it saysThis is basically saying Martial is not good enough.
Not if he's shite, people moan about Lingard but you think a trash striker from a bin league is going to be better? It's insane, at least the likes of King and Piatek play in proper leagues.So when we need a goal and Mason and Martial are already on the pitch... Who is more likely to get a goal? Him or Lingard?
When one of Martial or Mason inevitably gets injured... Wouldn't it be useful to have a back up? Who has cost us no money?
It's deadline day in January. Most clubs don't want to sell their strikers mate. We have him on loan and hopefully Rashford will be back in another 6-8 weeks. We will cope.Someone that isn't trash and who has been playing proper football for the last 3 years? Out of all the players we have been linked with for the striker role he's by far the worst option as he's been out there for way too long and was never that good to begin with.
He used to play in Norway. His agent is a business partner of Ole’s agent. You do the rest of the thinking.Genuinely interested to know how his name came up in conversation re a possible striker.
Not against it per se, just curious.
Ighalo Vs nothing?At least that was Henrik fecking Larson, not Ighalo ffs.
tbf both Chelsea and Spurs having been trying to get a striker in the window longer than us and both have failed to do soThere's no way Ighalo is the best striker we could've got on loan this window, but I suppose if the plan is to have him on the bench in case anything serious happens to Martial then it's not the worst idea.
Hopefully he won't be needed too much.Someone that isn't trash and who has been playing proper football for the last 3 years? Out of all the players we have been linked with for the striker role he's by far the worst option as he's been out there for way too long and was never that good to begin with.
We are supposedly paying 1/3 of his wages.How much
BS!At a reported £300,000-a-week, he must be!
He's not going to make any difference and will just take minutes from youngsters while doing feck all so yeah I prefer nothing if this is the option available.Ighalo Vs nothing?
We've had all month to get something done, this panic shit is why we end up in a mess so often, the fact we are now loaning a bum from a league that doesn't even rank in the top ten is crazy.It's deadline day in January. Most clubs don't want to sell their strikers mate. We have him on loan and hopefully Rashford will be back in another 6-8 weeks. We will cope.
Fixed.This is basically saying Martial is notgoodenough.
Divide that by 10 perhaps. I have zero faith in media.At a reported £300,000-a-week, he must be!
As a Striker option? 100% yes. Of course he'd be better then Lingard.Not if he's shite, people moan about Lingard but you think a trash striker from a bin league is going to be better? It's insane, at least the likes of King and Piatek play in proper leagues.
Maybe it was the only way we could get him. We don't have to take that option you know.Option to buy too ?
This is a nightmare. Can't be true surely ? FFS.