Physiocrat
Has No Mates
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Messages
- 8,978
Scrappy has made the argument in the past that the latter is superior as it is much easier to coordinate and keep stability in midfield particularly when the opposition counters. Is this correct? @GodShaveTheQueen
I can see the logic in it but is it much different that the full-backs taking turns to bomb up the flank?
I can understand why having two B2B midfielders could stifle the more attacking B2B types such as say Breitner or Falcao but I don't see that you would lose much on an individual level, assuming they could coordinate it properly, if you had a pair of Davids and Keane.
What does everyone else think?
I can see the logic in it but is it much different that the full-backs taking turns to bomb up the flank?
I can understand why having two B2B midfielders could stifle the more attacking B2B types such as say Breitner or Falcao but I don't see that you would lose much on an individual level, assuming they could coordinate it properly, if you had a pair of Davids and Keane.
What does everyone else think?