Fully Fledged
Full Member
He didn't say anything.speaking of celebrities....
He didn't say anything.speaking of celebrities....
He doesn’t read any briefings and doesn’t listen to people explaining stuff - apparently pictures are the only way to get through to him! Can’t believe I am writing this about the president of the US.fhe graph looks like they're made for 7 years old. Big colorful stripes with no text.
Even that he managed to fecked up by now knowing which direction he should read them from.
Amazing
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I remember that graphic
speaking of celebrities....
Man, I fecking love Neil Young.About time....
Neil Young sues Donald Trump's campaign for using his songs
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-53661683
I used to respect this guy. What the hell has he been watching all these months? Home alone 2?speaking of celebrities....
He's been a right-winger for many years by now.I used to respect this guy. What the hell has he been watching all these months? Home alone 2?
He's nuts.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Voight#Political_views said:In a July 28, 2008 op-ed in The Washington Times, he wrote that he regretted his youthful anti-war activism, and claimed that the peace movement of that time was driven by "Marxist propaganda". He also claimed that the radicals in the peace movement were responsible for the communists coming to power in Vietnam and Cambodia and for failing to stop the subsequent slaughter of 2.5 million people in the Killing Fields.[23]
In the same op-ed he also criticised the Democratic Party and Barack Obama's bid to become president claiming that the Democrats had created "a propaganda campaign with subliminal messages, creating a God-like figure (Obama)" who would "demoralize this country and help create a socialist America".[23] He claimed Obama had grown up with the teachings of very angry, militant white and black people around him.[23]
Yeah, he’s a fecking nutjob.He's been a right-winger for many years by now.
He's nuts.
This is peak **** stuff.speaking of celebrities....
MOre Voightism...This is peak **** stuff.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This is exactly what the r/Conservative are saying, that he is brave to do tough interviews and debates. While Biden doesn't want to show his mental decline.I honestly think in his warped mind, he's doing a great job. First Chris Wallace now Axios, I'm not shirking the tough interviews.
Nah mate, just have internalized anti-birdness.Birdist.
Cross thread callbackNah mate, just have internalized anti-birdness.
It depends which Biden shows up for the debate. If you get a prime 2008 version of Biden, he can definitely do some damage. But if you get the version of Biden that appeared at some of the primary debates, Trump will have a chance to show him up (at least to many wavering members of his base). Biden will still have the upper hand in winning the election but Trump could fire up enough of his base to make election day quite messy.Debates are one of the few reasons I didn’t mind a Biden vs Trump matchup too much. Joe is very no-nonsense and should have no problem smacking down Trump when he gets all crazy. Biden won’t try and come across as the shocked smart guy, he’ll just mock and brawl and get dirty.
Says the Impeached President.
Perfect.Nah mate, just have internalized anti-birdness.
I look back and now see he was playing his real self in Seinfeld - a deranged man who bites people, the Luis Suarez of Hollywood.He's been a right-winger for many years by now.
He's nuts.
That said, you can still enjoy him as an actor. I love Tom Cruise as an actor, but as a person he's a leading public figure in an evil, destructive ****.
Funny enough I haven't heard a single peep from the GOP peanut gallery with a collective, "Shut the feck up, Hollywood!" when it comes to Voight, Woods, et al.This is peak **** stuff.
Good point. His daughter must be mortified.Funny enough I haven't heard a single peep from the GOP peanut gallery with a collective, "Shut the feck up, Hollywood!" when it comes to Voight, Woods, et al.
Surely it is about his records with Deutsche Bank.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
They can be used to prove the fraud Cohen spoke of when he said he bumps the value of his properties for loans and understates the value for tax purposes. They can also help direct investigations towards specific shell companies. Follow the money as they say.From what I understand, the tax returns won't prove or disprove corruption, just embarrass him?
Thanks.They can be used to prove the fraud Cohen spoke of when he said he bumps the value of his properties for loans and understates the value for tax purposes. They can also help direct investigations towards specific shell companies. Follow the money as they say.
That wont be clear until we know what the specific crimes are. Wire fraud is 5 years for example (federal) but 10 years if the scheme affected a financial institution which Cohen’s allegations do.Thanks.
Any statue of limitation consideration?
Yes, I doubt even trump is that stupid to list "bribery" in actual tax return, It's like escobar filing tax return for his sales. Anything he dare file to the IRS is probably just the standard tax return, embarrassing but hardly incriminatingFrom what I understand, the tax returns won't prove or disprove corruption, just embarrass him?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I agree, really feels like we could have waited til after the election! this'll fire up teh base and some not on in the base. Even if it's obviously true.Well, the big announcement by NY AG was that she's going after the NRA. I'm afraid it might play into trump's hand.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I don't doubt they're crooked to the bone but the GOP will spin that in a way that makes it look as if the dems were going after their 2nd amendment rights? Even if they don't know what the 2nd amendment is about....
No doubt about it. Although one wonders whether or not its too late for them to mount a surge before the election, especially given that early voting starts next monthI don't doubt they're crooked to the bone but the GOP will spin that in a way that makes it look as if the dems were going after their 2nd amendment rights? Even if they don't know what the 2nd amendment is about....