The point that you and
@RDCR07 don't seem to grasp is that it is about the level of influence on the club. Not black and white morality.
There is a massive difference of influence between a sponsorship deal that contributes a small percentage of revenue, and being 100% owned and financed to sportswash a çountries image.
To give an even clearer sense of scale, the value of the club is £4bn, the sponsorship deal is what, probably worth £50m? A fraction.
Pregnancy is an amusing but inaccurate analogy, I'm afraid.