European Super League

Do you want the ESL to happen?


  • Total voters
    1,921
  • Poll closed .

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,013
Location
France
I never said they could close the gap. If you can't relate the question I asked and the discussion that was relevant, you are either dodging or you haven't been following the discussions. Feel free to go back and check the posts related to the discussions.
My mistake then.

So isn't that an opportunity for other teams to catch up then? West Ham and Leicester will get the top 4 ?
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,611
Supports
Mejbri
Realistically, there's no stopping the ESL. The best we can hope for is a softening of the initial ESL charter. In that regard, I'll support the protests. But I think everyone needs to be aware there's no 'winning' here. There's only 'losing less badly'.
No no. There is a light at the end of this particular tunnel, if we manage to get there, which would result in revamping the ownership structure. That's obviously the logical way to go, instead of navigating capitalist problems with more extreme capitalist solutions.
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,307
Location
Cooper Station
But Perez is literally the leader of this thing.
Isnt he a bit more reliable that Sam Lee? Where was Sam etc before Sunday anyway? How the feck did everybody miss this?
We cant even scout Sancho without getting caught yet here we are, creating a new European league on the sly
I agree he was pretty arrogant too suggesting he knows that it can’t be stopped etc.
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
Isn't this awful news? That means there's not even that much incentive to even bother bloody winning the damn super league! Even less chance of investment in the team, because why should they? Whats there really to gain? The Glazers have wanted success for money, if they don't need success for money, why would they bother improving the team? They wouldn't.
To some degree. But it would hopefully be mitigated by this:
  • A further 32.5 per cent would be distributed between all 20 participating teams, including the five sides invited to play in the competition each year
And this one needs to be bigger.
 

sewey89

Incorrectly predicted the de Jong transfer 2022
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
10,683
Location
Chesterfield
Hmmm.... I don't hate this as much as I thought I would.
  • The competition winner would receive just 1.5 times more than the bottom side. By comparison, that ratio in Spain’s La Liga is closer to 3.5 times
This is good, and would make for a more competitive ESL.

It also makes it less appealing to the money men to actually win it or compete. Why bother signing new players if prize money is practically irrelevant

  • The 15 “founding clubs” of the Super League would share 32.5 per cent of these commercial revenues
This percentage needs to be smaller, imo.

This is ridiculously big, as you say.
  • A further 32.5 per cent would be distributed between all 20 participating teams, including the five sides invited to play in the competition each year
And this one needs to be bigger.

The fact the 'founding clubs' get ANOTHER share of 32.5 is disgusting.
  • The final 15 per cent would be shared based on broadcast audience size
I'd like to see an additional commitment to parachute payments/funding of national leagues in order to help grass roots football.

I don't have that much of a problem with this as a standalone rule, but you're right, do the 'bigger clubs' really need more on top of what they're getting. This could be used much better
  • Super League clubs have committed to using only 55 per cent of their revenues on “sport spending”, such as player salaries, transfer and agent fees, according to people familiar with the terms
Good. But only if some of the remaining 45% is earmarked for improvement of local neighbourhoods and youth development. If it all goes to the owners, they can feck off.

Agree. But like you say, it's very important to see where the rest goes. I suspect we already know.

.
 

MonkeysMagic

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
1,920
Location
Euclidean space
In all of this, despite my own grave concerns and vehement opposition to the ESL, I will not be lectured by UEFA and FIFA about 'preservation of the game for the ordinary person'.

Given their scandalous and corrupt handling of these organisations, for them to take the moral high ground on this matter is beyond a joke! It has more than a whiff of self-preservation or rather the continuation of inflated Bank balances. So a message to Ceferin, Infantino et al...sort your own house at before chucking stones!
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
It wasnt missed, this has been reported on for a few years. Was very loud last year too, everyone just denied it
But every club having signed up to it is huge news. It was always described as a threat but they went out and did it and not a peep.
I do wonder if a few journos were enticed to keep quiet, hence the soft coverage of Chelsea and City. Lets see if they suddenly break some big transfer news over the summer.
 

Nogbadthebad

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
5,468
Location
Wolverhampton
Stretford Paddock have an interesting view, what happens to our youth teams?

Without access to the various competitions, how does the academy bring through new talent?
 

Kill 'em all

Pastor of Muppets
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
10,546
I'm not entirely sure on the following, but you'd assume there won't be grounds to sue if the clubs involved are legally obligated to pull out due to government legislation.

Right?
That could lead to the club to be moved offshore as it would be cheaper than being sued.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Stretford Paddock have an interesting view, what happens to our youth teams?

Without access to the various competitions, how does the academy bring through new talent?
We arent being kicked out of domestic football.
 

bsCallout

New Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Messages
4,278
No it won't but this foul cry by UEFA or PL is just a skint attempt because they are losing their money and not exactly because of their love towards the game.
If there is one thing that could and should come out of this, it is increased scrunity of Uefa and Fifa.

Ultimately this may be the thing that increases regulations across the sport. If it doesn't go ahead.
 

pratyush_utd

Can't tell DeGea and Onana apart.
Joined
Aug 30, 2017
Messages
8,431
Sam Lee who is as reliable as it gets for city stated yesterday that these agreements are not legally binding.
Sam Lee is no longer reliable for City. Hierarchy at City were upset due to one of his article and now doesn't get any exclusive scoop from the club.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,633
I think the 50+1 rule is a good idea but there are many potential negatives with it, the biggest drawback of the 50+1 rule is that it limits the financial capacity of the clubs. Without being able to captain the ship, external investors would not like to channel heavy funds into a team and current investors might decide to leave.
This will mean the major sources of PL club finances will be limited to the revenue generated through operational activities like match tickets, shirt sales, et al.
This is why Bayern is so dominant financially in the Bundesliga.
So I can see the big 6 doing 5 but the likes of Evertin, Leeds, West Ham may struggle to get potential investors.
Yeah because external billionaires/investors with no ties or connections to English clubs or English football have been great for the English game, culminating in the debacle currently playing out with the SL proposal.
 

BFernandes

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
858
Location
Groom Lake
What's boiling my piss is the clubs not willing to talk about it. The complete and utter silence.

6 of these clubs have thrown the game into massive turmoil, and all they can do is sit quietly behind their shit statements released on their websites.

No communications with their own players or fans. It's as if they think they they lay low for awhile people will forget about it and they'll get their way.

So out of touch and disconnected with the football community it's laughable.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,838
[
Competitive sport IS business and has been for decades - the two can't be separated.
This has been the way the sport has been going since TV Rights were introduced, and shirt sponsors, and state-backed owners - this particular action may have escalated the decline into market capitalisation quicker than previous ones, but this was always the outcome.

If they were concerned about the PL losing jobs they would've done more during the pandemic this time last year, they're not.
Fair enough yes you’re right, I’m too romantic toward the sport itself and honestly, even if I could see a super league or such happening in the future I didn’t expect it to be a closed off group who still wanted to feck up their national leagues by still being part of it.

UEFA reforms, Champions league reform, a new competition aligned with UEFA, any of that but not a private made up league separate to current football structures, that’s a joke.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,838
Isn't this awful news? That means there's not even that much incentive to even bother bloody winning the damn super league! Even less chance of investment in the team, because why should they? Whats there really to gain? The Glazers have wanted success for money, if they don't need success for money, why would they bother improving the team? They wouldn't.
It’s a glorified friendly league separate to UEFA and FIFA just to provide a steady stream of income to already filthy rich men for the next twenty years. Pathetic how anyone can even begin to want it
 

Paxi

Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,678
Klopp and Guardiola have both spoken against it but we need more. Are we expecting too much from them to threaten to walk? I would fully support the Man Utd squad and management threatening to walk.
Yes probably a bit too much , but they’ve did the right thing and that in of itself presents the question — how can these owners, go into this new proposed competition, that their own players and coaches are not in support of?

I also expect Ole to complete swerve this as I don’t think it would be very good for the longevity of his reign here. By all accounts, we’re the primary drivers behind this new league.

Klopp and Pep can voice their discontent because it would be suicidal for the board to sack them due to their recent success. Ole doesn’t have that type of credit in the bank with Glazers IMO.