England - Euro 2021 Discussion | FA chairman: Southgate to be offered new contract until Euro 2024

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,373
On what basis were they "completely outclassed"? England were better and deserved to win but were themselves nothing special. Also, this Croatia team is mediocre anyway.

England created little and had little control in midfield. Doesn't scream domination to me.
On the basis that England completely controlled the game. Scored more goals. Crested more chances. And, you know, won.

England were extremely comfortable for the entire game.
 

UncleBob

New Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
6,330
I think you're way off the mark here. Possession was pretty much dead even as was pass completion, at half time possession was 60% to England. The xG was 1.47 - 0.53 in England's favour. Croatia didn't have a single big chance. England had two big chances and scored one. Later in the second half we did drop off and allowed them possession and they didn't create any big chances. Croatia are not a team of old men, they had 3 players on the pitch over the age of 30 and one over 32 with Modric at 35. That is not washed up age in the modern game by a long shot. Whilst Croatia are not the team of 3 years ago they're a decent side with one of the best midfields in the competition. It was a very professional performance and a deserved win. If your opponent can't create a proper chance then you have controlled the game, its as simple as that.

Cheer up.
What?
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
I'm slightly concerned that fan and media 'expectation' has crept back in where England are concerned.

For years at every tournament, England were overhyped, from the outset of every group stage, it was persistently 'our year' - always made worse by qualification from group stages before inevitably a cannon-ball sized dose of reality was administered, usually courtesy of a team that the tabloids had declared "should be no trouble for England". Then in 2018, for the first time in decades, England had a strange and unfamiliar underdog spirit about them. We had an unproven manager, a young team and it felt like we had nothing to lose. Southgate was plucky, always stoical but modest in his ambitions - he never spoke of winning the tournament, but we played consistently well and found ourselves in the last four. That was our lot and we were delighted with it, we probably should have beaten Croatia in the semi final but that's neither here nor there.

Fast forward 3 years, even before a ball has been kicked, serious commentators and pundits are suggesting England have the means to win it. The arrogance seems to be rising again. Southgate hasn't changed much, but everybody else's expectations of him certainly have. The expectation is creeping back in again.



I can already feel the frenzy on its way if we win our next game, the premature belief that we're definitely the best national team in Europe. Just wait, 3 points against Scotland and at least one sports journo will write a hot take piece about how England will overcome France and Belgium, including the obligatory 'route to the final chart' that has us winning every game without a single draw after 90 minutes.

On the real - we've just beaten Croatia, this is a great result for England but it was never a given. I hope that if we qualify from the group, the frenzy doesn't kick in like in years of old, because this weight of expectation has a real habit of not only burdening our players but biting us in the arse when we play a team that is perceived to be 'beatable'.
the expectation is never there.

it's Very self deprecating.

can we win it? Yes of course. England are one of half a dozen teams that can. Chances are we won’t. But let’s enjoy the matches when they come - and hope we don’t go to pens against the Germans!
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,373
Dominated in what way?

Possession: England 49% v 51% Croatia

8 shots each - 2 shots on target each

In fact, every single thing is almost equal between the teams. Literally, the only difference was the goal.

Had Croatia scored instead, their performance would have been identical to ours.
But they didn't, and they didn't even come close.
 

tjb

Full Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,330
Grealish is good but ffs sake over reaction much? This is just the first game of a tournament.
My problem isn't that he just got dropped, it's obvious why too
Yeah, we're desperately lacking a Modric. It's why I'd go 4-3-3 and give Grealish and Foden a go at dictating games ahead of a Rice.
Grealish would have been dropping into midfield. It's like having David Silva and saying you don't have midfielders.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,373
the expectation is never there.

it's Very self deprecating.

can we win it? Yes of course. England are one of half a dozen teams that can. Chances are we won’t. But let’s enjoy the matches when they come - and hope we don’t go to pens against the Germans!
But possession was equal so the game was even, or something...
 

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,230
Location
Not Moskva
Why is it not a bad performance?

Croatia are not the team of three years ago, so I'm not sure why people are treating them as such tough opponents. Rakitic is retired; Modric is an old man by football standards; Perisic is the same.

We created three chances in ninety minutes with home advantage. Most of the time we were in our own half, playing the ball around slowly. We ceded a lot of possession to Croatia, putting us on the backfoot for long periods of the game. It is fortunate that they are not the team of three years ago, otherwise, we would have come away with a loss after being dominated.

A goal doesn't change the fact that we barely even ventured out of our half after the first twenty minutes.
We had by far the best chances - Foden hitting the post, the goal, Kane’s miss when he slid into the post, the Mount free kick, Sterling’s wild shot over the bar. Not the all-singing, all- dancing entertainment your beloved England RU team has treated us to the last 18 months, admittedly, but a very solid start.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
In reality England were neither awful nor dominant.

They were fine. They did what they needed to do and happily nullified a lesser Croatia side.

The question is whether they improve from here (which there is plenty of room to do given there are other talented players who could step into the side to improve it) or if they'll continue on like this until a better side inevitably beats them.
 

MU655

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
1,258
But they didn't, and they didn't even come close.
No, it didn't. But if we play like that again, I guarantee that it will cost us when we face any team with good forwards. You cannot play that deep for so long.

Croatia's forwards aren't even as good as some of players we couldn't fit in the squad.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,373
No, it didn't. But if we play like that again, I guarantee that it will cost us when we face any team with good forwards. You cannot play that deep for so long.

Croatia's forwards aren't even as good as some of players we couldn't fit in the squad.
If this happens you promise this and that. Yadda yadda. You play what's infront of you. We did. We won. The end.
 

MU655

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
1,258
If this happens you promise this and that. Yadda yadda. You play what's infront of you. We did. We won. The end.
Great managers don't think like that, though. It shows the mentality.
 

djembatheking

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Messages
4,050
Fairly comfortable game and getting the win takes the edge off the next game . Would be nice to see Southgate give Grealish, Shaw and maybe Rashford starts to keep everyone involved . Bring on Scotland.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,373
Great managers don't think like that, though. It shows the mentality.
What does this mean? What's even your point anymore?

England played Croatia today in the opening game of the tournament and won. They win the opening game for the first time in their history. They did so against the team that knocked them out of the last tournament, and exactly the sort of team they often struggle against.

Is there room to improve? Sure. So what? No one is saying there isn't. They played. They won.

Next.

Edit. Maybe lighten up a bit. Football is a sport. It's to be enjoyed. Enjoy the wins while you can. Thats what it's all about. Instead of absolutely pointlessly killing yourself over tiny details and what might have been, or what might be next time.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,465
Location
Manchester
Why is it not a bad performance?

Croatia are not the team of three years ago, so I'm not sure why people are treating them as such tough opponents. Rakitic is retired; Modric is an old man by football standards; Perisic is the same.

We created three chances in ninety minutes with home advantage. Most of the time we were in our own half, playing the ball around slowly. We ceded a lot of possession to Croatia, putting us on the backfoot for long periods of the game. It is fortunate that they are not the team of three years ago, otherwise, we would have come away with a loss after being dominated.

A goal doesn't change the fact that we barely even ventured out of our half after the first twenty minutes.
England won the game very comfortably. It was the first game, and on paper the most challenging of the group, and the team passed the test.

Croatia didn't have a single chance. I'm not sure what you're on about really.
 

Abraxas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
6,055
It was a decent performance. There are definitely holes that can be picked if you go looking for them but it's a good one to get over the line against a competent footballing side. Kane should have buried that, a great chance by his standards and then it looks a very good performance.

The defence and some of the tactical elements will certainly be tested more as the tournament progresses, but England do have a few cards to play considering what is on the bench and potentially Maguire to return.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,465
Location
Manchester
What does this mean? What's even your point anymore?

England played Croatia today in the opening game of the tournament and won. They win the opening game for the first time in their history. They did so against the team that knocked them out of the last tournament, and exactly the sort of team they often struggle against.

Is there room to improve? Sure. So what? No one is saying there isn't. They played. They won.

Next.

Edit. Maybe lighten up a bit. Football is a sport. It's to be enjoyed. Enjoy the wins while you can. Thats what it's all about. Instead of absolutely pointlessly killing yourself over tiny details and what might have been, or what might be next time.
Good post
 

Siezard

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 9, 2020
Messages
915
Why England will win the Euro!

Firstly, they get to meet Croatia, their rival in the last world cup. England will be ready to exact revenge and will be going all out. Scotland and Czech are easy confidence booster. Let's not forget England are the hosts for their own 3 matches.

England will top the group and then face one of France/Portugal/Germany. Nobody will fancy England and once again, England will be on full frontal attack instead of passing sideways. The result: Another England victory.

Next, England will most likely face the winner of Group E (Weak team in Spain, Sweden, Poland, Slovakia) and triumph easily.

Then, don't forget, England is hosting all the semi-finals and finals so they will win!

***
I mentioned in the newbie forum that England will win.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,373
Why England will win the Euro!

Firstly, they get to meet Croatia, their rival in the last world cup. England will be ready to exact revenge and will be going all out. Scotland and Czech are easy confidence booster. Let's not forget England are the hosts for their own 3 matches.

England will top the group and then face one of France/Portugal/Germany. Nobody will fancy England and once again, England will be on full frontal attack instead of passing sideways. The result: Another England victory.

Next, England will most likely face the winner of Group E (Weak team in Spain, Sweden, Poland, Slovakia) and triumph easily.

Then, don't forget, England is hosting all the semi-finals and finals so they will win!

***
I mentioned in the newbie forum that England will win.
:drool:
 

Red_Aaron

Full Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2005
Messages
4,321
Location
Dig up stupid!
Conceded the initiative but got away with it as this Croatian side is ageing and never had a huge goal threat even at its peak

Managers live and die by their decisions, bottom line they won so he's justified with it

We'll need to be a lot braver in the knockouts and who knows maybe he's keeping his powder dry for those

I doubt it though
 

Trequarista10

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2020
Messages
2,542
Phillips did better than I expected in a more advanced role.

Mings was a concern before the game but played well.

Not convinced by Foden playing on the wing tbh. Would prefer Sterling on the right and Grealish or possibly Rashford on the left.
 

Giggsy13

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2016
Messages
4,342
Location
Toronto
Nice win but I think England’s midfield will get overrun if/when they come up against heavyweights like Germany, France or Italy. The midfield is definitely an area of weakness and not helped by some of southgate’s baffling decisions.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,612
Phillips did better than I expected in a more advanced role.

Mings was a concern before the game but played well.

Not convinced by Foden playing on the wing tbh. Would prefer Sterling on the right and Grealish or possibly Rashford on the left.
Honestly, I’ve given Phillips some shit this season but he was mint today, stepped up when he was asked.
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
Why England will win the Euro!

Firstly, they get to meet Croatia, their rival in the last world cup. England will be ready to exact revenge and will be going all out. Scotland and Czech are easy confidence booster. Let's not forget England are the hosts for their own 3 matches.

England will top the group and then face one of France/Portugal/Germany. Nobody will fancy England and once again, England will be on full frontal attack instead of passing sideways. The result: Another England victory.

Next, England will most likely face the winner of Group E (Weak team in Spain, Sweden, Poland, Slovakia) and triumph easily.

Then, don't forget, England is hosting all the semi-finals and finals so they will win!

***
I mentioned in the newbie forum that England will win.
It was a good result against Croatia, but there’s no way in hell Scotland will be an easy confidence booster. England are a much better side but that game is probably going to be a slog. Even if England win comfortably they’re not going to go into it thinking it’ll be a dawdle.

France Portugal Germany would all be very tough.

I like your optimism and I think England will have a chance, but it probably won’t be as easy as you’ve written.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
England, France, Portugal, Germany, Belgium, easily.

It's even tempting to throw in Italy.

Croatia aren't very good...They have 4 wins in the past 14 matches.
I'll give you France, Portugal and Germany but the others are arguable. Modric is obviously a top player and although past his best is still very classy. He is exactly the kind of player England needs. Brozovic is very highly rated and won Serie A with Inter this season. Kovacic is a very gifted player but I think there's some psychological frailty with him.

Croatia are a decent side but yes England are better than them. England actually has a really good record against Croatia WC2018 semi-final aside. We were better than them in both games in the Nations League straight after the World Cup winning one and drawing the other in Croatia.
 

DSG

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
2,417
Location
A Whale’s Vagina
Glad I didn’t bet on England.

Is it just me, or did Southgate strip out every single interesting option he had in his starting 11? I mean, you have to start Kane, Mount and Stones. Maybe Foden was the one selection?

Very little quality passing in the midfield, patterns of play were nowhere to be found. After the 3rd thru ball from Trippier that spun out, I stopped counting. That’s why you play a left footed LB instead of… oh nevermind.

I reckon they will lose in the quarters. Italy would dominate that starting 11.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
It was a good result against Croatia, but there’s no way in hell Scotland will be an easy confidence booster. England are a much better side but that game is probably going to be a slog. Even if England win comfortably they’re not going to go into it thinking it’ll be a dawdle.

France Portugal Germany would all be very tough.

I like your optimism and I think England will have a chance, but it probably won’t be as easy as you’ve written.
It's Scotland's biggest game for literally decades. They will be so up for it.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,383
Supports
Chelsea
Honestly, I’ve given Phillips some shit this season but he was mint today, stepped up when he was asked.
He was played in a more advanced role than I'd seen him before. A bit like Kante in a way. It kind of suited him. Really pleased for him too because he was one of those players people weren't so sure about. He was great today.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,612
He was played in a more advanced role than I'd seen him before. A bit like Kante in a way. It kind of suited him. Really pleased for him too because he was one of those players people weren't so sure about. He was great today.
Yeah for sure, like you say a few people were unsure of him (myself included) but the pass he played through to Sterling was excellent, great vision and execution. Like I said, I’m happy if he keeps proving me wrong!
 

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
6,855
I know a lot of people hated the first 11 and think we played badly, but I think there are some positives. I think the worst decision was not playing Shaw, Trippier did not offer anything Shaw wouldn't offer better.

I think one of the worst players was Kane, and I think it showed through Sterling. Sterling offered some movement and made chances, Kane was just not offering anything, and lost the ball most of the time.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,612
I know a lot of people hated the first 11 and think we played badly, but I think there are some positives. I think the worst decision was not playing Shaw, Trippier did not offer anything Shaw wouldn't offer better.

I think one of the worst players was Kane, and I think it showed through Sterling. Sterling offered some movement and made chances, Kane was just not offering anything, and lost the ball most of the time.
There was definitely some positives, we genuinely played quite well and created some good chances. Just think there’s one or two players we could switch out who played today who played with better options.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,695
Location
india
Where was Rice's passing ability that some claim he has?

Also Sancho really should be starting ahead of Foden.
 

UnitedSofa

You'll Never Walk Away
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
6,790
How & Why is it obvious?


My problem isn't that he just got dropped, it's obvious why too
Grealish would have been dropping into midfield. It's like having David Silva and saying you don't have midfielders.
 

UnitedSofa

You'll Never Walk Away
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
6,790
Foden is an incredible talent, don’t think Sancho should start ahead of him. Maybe alongside him in a front 3.

Sure his club form is amazing but Sancho hasn’t exactly lit up the place whilst in an England shirt.

Where was Rice's passing ability that some claim he has?

Also Sancho really should be starting ahead of Foden.